my attention was drawn to this post I have quoted only because I have references to Jainism being a shaytans organised grouping, and there fore occult and so anti-Islamic
could anybody please correct me if that is wrong?
Sorry, have only just spotted this. Of course it's wrong. Why on earth would Shaytan (even if there were such a being) organise a group which has such respect for all life that it makes the average Buddhist look bloodthirsty? And a thousand years before Islam, at that.
That is, if you reject the falsifications in Christian teaching, you are allowed to explore falsificiations of Hinduism in which it is denied that any Hindi believe in One God, or falisfications of the Buddhist Scriptures, in which the Animist aspect is removed, and in which the real convergences between Buddhism and Christianity are denied in favour of more modern false convergences. For example, it was all the fashion for a while to be Zen, and then the fashion changed. Now Tibetean Buddhists have worked very hard so that their variety of Buddism is that most fashionable variety of non-Christian belief which is enabled in "the west".
Do you actually have any evidence for
any of this (i.e a source that can actually back it up with facts?)
Sticking with Buddhism (you are hopelessly wrong on Hinduism, too),
what falsifications? Nobody has 'falsified' anything. And what, in terms of Buddhist and Christian comparative theology has been 'denied'? There has always been an element of animism in Tibetan Buddhism (although it is unwise to generalise, it is far from predominant in the largest school), which every Buddhist scholar and student is aware of. Tibetan Buddhists haven't worked "very hard" at anything (apart from there studies and practice, anyway), as you say the emphasis in the West has moved that way from Zen to some extent but that's because trends change, not because of some publicity campaign (unless you count the Dalai Lama's books). What is actually taught, as opposed to what appears in popular literature, is far closer to each other than you might think. Both are Buddhism.
The point I want to make is that I know that occultists are active in promoting specific belief systems as appropriate or not appropriate.
Again, how do you support that? It only makes sense if you classify all adherents of any Eastern tradition as one homogeneous group (of 'occultists' :rollseyes ) somehow picking between what traditions they teach - which is utter nonsense. Tibetan Buddhists teach Tibetan Buddhism, Zen masters teach Zen and no doubt Hare Krishna types teach their tradition of Hinduism. The first two, at least, have been doing so for a very long time. None of them switch from one to the other for convenience, although no doubt a few beginning students may in trying to find teh path that is right for them.
As a matter of interest, has it occured to you that one reason for the 'rise' of Tibetan Buddhism in the West might just be that so many Tibetan leaders (which, in terms of Tibet means religious), are now in exile from their country? Or was the Chinese invasion all part of the evil 'occultist' masterplan as well?
We must question, why are some Religions sects of "the east" being enabled and others not being enabled.
No, there is no need to ask that question. Again, your comments about 'enabling' are simply rubbish. Most of the traditions you refer to have been around for hundreds when not thousands of years. They have co-existed throughout that time, due to variations in belief, geography and cultural tradition. They still do.
But most especially Why is it that those belief sects being enabled are those which conspire to sustain out dated God-head modes of worship, and those beliefs which are not being enabled are those which sustain clear belief in One God Allah.
Sorry, but this is just paranoia on overdrive. I should maybe comment on "out-dated God-head modes of worship", as in my opinion the monotheistic tradition is just a simplication and anthromorphization of such traditions and in no way whatsoever an advance on them, but that's straying rather off topic. No Buddhist teachings, including the traditional and (probably) eldest ones, 'sustain clear belief in one God' as Creator - in Buddhist terms the actual concept is complete nonsense.
The might of Islam is the only avenue by which the occultists actions can be overcome.
You don't really believe this stuff, do you? :?
There is no reason, apart from occultist fiddling with the economy..
Maybe you thinking of the Bilderbergs? Or the Illuminati?! ;D
