LOL. The post #6 is actually your post, and only containing your opinion that Press TV made up the whole thing.
Of course it's my post. Your point is?
I certainly speculated that, yes.
And Br, Ardianto in #9 and I in post #11 showed that your hatred and imagination about Press TV ran wild because Press TV actually sourced their news report from Xinhua News Agency, and Xinhua based it on direct interviews with The Palestinian National Authority (PNA), the Israel peace organization (Peace Now), the International Movement to Defend Children.
Ardianto pointed out the reference to Xinhua, which I'm afraid I manage to miss. If you think that is indicitive of my "hatred and imagination about Press TV" so be it; I can only say that was not the case.
I suspect you only read your own posts, because in post #10, it is reported that Subaru denied any link to the commercial, which proved the commercial did exist.
It proved the
photo being complained about existed, not that any 'commercial' did. Who ever claimed otherwise?
And if you read post #9 and #10 you would have known that the advertisement was published in Subaru Israel's Facebook page before being taken down.
It was reproduced there not 'published'. Nowhere does it say who
by or in what context, being Facebook it could have been anybody. Do you not think advertisements would appear on their showroom site or on automobile related websites rather than (for some 'random' reason) Facebook? Get real. To quote, erm, yourself..
The Gulf News reported on its website on Friday that the advertisement had “resurfaced a few days ago on a Facebook page for the Subaru car company in Israel, with some words in Hebrew
'
Resurfaced'? Where did it actually appear before? Again, is there the slightest bit of evidence that, outside of the press it ever did? Why have neither the Chinese or Iranian websites got any pictures of the commercial
as a commercial? Why has nobody else? Are we really expected to believe that this phantom advertisement was somehow dug up by Subura Israel
after all the fuss, a ' few words in Hebrew' added and then was plonked on Facebook for no obvious reason by themselves other than, presumably, to invite a major ear-bashing from Subaru in Japan?
I'd like reiterate again:
It is obvious that you show a lot of concern whenever some random Israeli entities are getting annoyed, but does not show any slightest concern whenever Palestinian babies are being killed by Israelis or whenever palestinians are evicted from their homes and their lands stolen.
I have merely pointed out that the advertisement is clearly fake. If you actually valued the Palestinian cause you would realize this sort of garbage does that case no good at all and fools nobody outside of it's totally uncritical and gullible intended audience (please see the thread on the Peace Flotilla for the other side of the coin). This thread is not about babies, or evictions, it is about that advertisement -
a fact you pointed out yourself. You are the expert on 'hatred'; you really ought to be able to identify instances intended purely to whip it up.
Or some random buddhist who often prefer to side with the Israeli oppressors?
Actually, I don't 'side' with anybody. Unfortunately, as you do to the extent that any capacity for critical thought is flung away in a frenzy of 'evil Zionist' bashing I suspect you are psychologically incapable of recognising the fact. Moving on ...
Talking of reiteration;
Of course, if you wish to contest the above it's easy - just point us to a photo of the 'ad' in situ. 'Evidence', as you say.
You ignored that, of course, but I'm afraid it's time to put aside the blathering and move into 'put up or shut up' mode. Just one link to one photograph of this so-called commercial in a setting in which any reasonable person would expect to find a commercial is all that's needed. Evidence, please.
I would also be curious to hear your comments regarding my observation about the number of photographers present around the incident, something else you have chosen to ignore? And indeed why, as you are so concerned with 'hatred', there hasn't been a peep from you regarding something totally obvious in the video, that the 'evil Zionist' driver had no intention of 'running down' anybody and appeared to do everything possible to avoid it. Perhaps you might want to mull over which adults in that video
would have been responsible had the boy been injured. The driver, or the four guys with cameras who just mysteriously happened to be there plus the assorted others that equally mysteriously appeared from nowhere to hussle the boy into a car.
