Grace Seeker
IB Legend
- Messages
- 5,343
- Reaction score
- 617
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Christianity
I will confess that you have raised a good question with regard to the title "Everlasting Father" being applied to Jesus. Because you are also correct that with regard to the doctrine of the Trinity, one of the key facets of that teaching is while there are three personas in one being, that there still remains distinctions between them so that the father is not the son, nor the son the father, though they be one.
There does indeed appear to be some incongruity between those two statements. And honestly I don't know the best way to address that at the moment. I would have to do some major reflecting and review of the passage in question if you want me to articulate more than an off the cuff response. I think Glo's pointing to Jesus' comments about he and the Father being one might be helpful, but I don't pretend that they solve this issue. Another might be that we need to better understand what Isaiah was trying to say in that passage and be careful that we don't misapply the titles in ways beyond their intent. So, I do appreciate the question, but I don't see it as significant enough to challenge the overall Christian understanding of the nature and character of God nor our identification of Jesus as the divine son of God. Is this the sort of serious question that would change the nature of your view of Jesus if resolved?
There does indeed appear to be some incongruity between those two statements. And honestly I don't know the best way to address that at the moment. I would have to do some major reflecting and review of the passage in question if you want me to articulate more than an off the cuff response. I think Glo's pointing to Jesus' comments about he and the Father being one might be helpful, but I don't pretend that they solve this issue. Another might be that we need to better understand what Isaiah was trying to say in that passage and be careful that we don't misapply the titles in ways beyond their intent. So, I do appreciate the question, but I don't see it as significant enough to challenge the overall Christian understanding of the nature and character of God nor our identification of Jesus as the divine son of God. Is this the sort of serious question that would change the nature of your view of Jesus if resolved?