Military History Lovers?

[alcurad]

right, but my point was that the third Reich did in fact have the capacity to invade both the British Isles & Russia if not for some bad decisions on Hitler's part.
http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/articles/invadingrussia.aspx

 

[ahsan28]

That could have been possible, I am not sure about that . But the important consideration in military strategy is to avoid reinforcing failure and concentrate on what you can do, within the existing resources and capabilities. Its always better to restrict to the main objective. Too many objectives create confusion and lead to clash of priorities, besides resulting in dissipation of resources. One has the flexibility of exercising various ways and means, provided they ultimately converge at the main objective. I think Hitler didn't have the ability to utilize the most professional and competent field commanders, military can ever produce.

 

[alcurad]

^true, although at times you have to fight on more than one front, for example the arab invasion of Egypt, Persia and the fertile crescent was almost simultaneous, but they did avoid the harder spots.

 

[ardianto]

A question for moderator.

Regarding to this topic, may I insert picture of weapon or military vehicle or photo of a battle in my post ?.

 

[Woodrow]

A question for moderator.

Regarding to this topic, may I insert picture of weapon or military vehicle or photo of a battle in my post ?.

Our ban on pictures of military weapons are mainly in avatars, signatures and profiles. If it is important for the clarity of the post and the post is not promoting violence I have no objection as long as the picture is a vital part of the post.

 

[Alim Apprentice]

Though I'm not a total devotee of military history, I certainly appreciate knowing about the strategies, tactics and technology employed in battles throughout history.