Morsi - What did he do?

[جوري]

Hence I said when they practiced Islam Marie - 56 and 67 the communist gamal was passing out pictures of Egyptian and american *****s on the military to boost their morale American style and there's nothing Islamic about that!
The rest of your assessment is filler for me not sure if you've questions or comments to make I deal with the first and little to no interest in the latter!

Best,

 

[WarriorforMarie]

Hence I said when they practiced Islam Marie - 56 and 67 the communist gamal was passing out pictures of Egyptian and american *****s on the military to boost their morale American style and there's nothing Islamic about that!

So, are you saying that the Egyptian army cease to practice Islam around 56 to 67? Because you said "It reminds me if their five hundred million dollar impenetrable bar lev line which the Egyptian army back when they were still Muslims took it down with plain water!" which was afterwards. Did the army change back and forth during that time?

 

[جوري]

Not sure which part was difficult for you to understand from what was written considering you can re read it!

 

[WarriorforMarie]

Not sure which part was difficult for you to understand from what was written considering you can re read it!

What I am trying to understand is this. You seemed to suggest that in 1973 the Egyptian Army "were still Muslims" and seemed to indicate that that was part of the reason for their initial success in that war (even though the campaign eventually unraveled). But then you bring up 56 and 67 and seem to suggest that since pictures were distributed that depicted...something, that this negated the Army's status as Muslims. Was I wrong in thinking that was the case? Was it that the Amry has gone back and forth from being Muslim or was the Army Muslim up to 1973?

 

[جوري]

What I wrote is clear when they pledged their resistance to God they were successful in spite of modest means when they pledged it to Abdul Nasser and *****s they lost!

 

[WarriorforMarie]

What I wrote is clear when they pledged their resistance to God they were successful in spite of modest means when they pledged it to Abdul Nasser and *****s they lost!

So in 1973 they pledged their allegiance (I assume you meant 'allegiance' instead of resistance) to God? That was why they were able to overcome the bar lev line?

 

[جوري]

Asmaa in her last moments.. the daughter of Dr. Beltagi, she was targeted specifically along with other brotherhood members with an Amero/Zionist plan carried out by traitors in Egypt.
feast your eyes on the killing of little girls- the best of Egypt sacrifices so the worst of it can live in the bosoms of their Zionist buddies!

 

[faithandpeace]

I couldn't understand the Arabic. What happened to her? Was she shot? Bomb blast? This is very sad and horrific!

 

[جوري]

They killed her in rabi3a sister along with 6000 other peaceful protesters against the coup.. I am surprised western news which btw partook in chemical warfare in Fallujah and allowed the use of phosphorus in Gaza and 14 other chemical attacks in Syria and are now suddenly concerned about Bashar.. Now you know sis, they're all in cahoots, and she well they labeled her a terrorist, they've also taken in her father and made up charges against him the same made up charges against anyone who opposes them 'terrorists'!

 

[faithandpeace]

This sick behavior needs to stop and soon.

 

[Independent]

I am surprised western news which btw partook in chemical warfare in Fallujah and allowed the use of phosphorus in Gaza and 14 other chemical attacks in Syria and are now suddenly concerned about Bashar.. Now you know sis, they're all in cahoots, and she well they labeled her a terrorist, they've also taken in her father and made up charges against him the same made up charges against anyone who opposes them 'terrorists'

Depleted uranium and phosphorus are not chemical weapons (they are used in munitions) and are not illegal, so the use of these in Fallujah and Gaza is not relevant. You may feel they ought to be illegal - but that's not the case in international law right now.

As for chemical weapons....Syria is one of a handful of countries that have refused to sign the Chemical Weapons Convention which prohibits manufacture and use of chemical weapons. (Egypt is another.) Having denied they had such weapons for many years, Syria admitted they did in 2012.

There have been many suspected attacks during the civil war but absolute proof is difficult to obtain, and proof of who used them even harder. Nevertheless it is hard to believe that Assad is not the guilty party.

Unfortunately the Russians refuse to see it like that and they block all UN votes (along with China). The Russians are also guilty of helping Syria develop biological weapons (anthrax etc).

Why is everyone focusing on the Americans, when this is overwhelmingly the responsibility of the Russians and Assad? The Americans are, so far, a minor player in this conflict. It's the Russians who should be in the dock.

We should also focus attention on the countries that have refused to sign the treaty such as Egypt and North Korea, and those who have signed it but not ratified it, such as Israel.

 

[جوري]

and are not illegal

You shouldn't use the first article that comes out of google under guradian UK and copy it almost word for word as if an authority figure on the matter as for what is or isn't legal, well you tell that to the Iraqis when their kids are born dead or with birth defects:

This Iraqi baby has little chance in life thanks to the U.S. and Britain!​

​

This is what depleted uranium does!​

​

So what is exactly relevant for you? I am not sure why the mods continue to turn a blind eye to a hypocrite such as yourself but I guess if you insert enough honey in your poison and do it with skill they can't hold anything on you.

btw we have already established that countries at least as far as ME is concerned who refused to sign this or that don't represent their people. I don't know who elected them, they're pretty much in the govt. because they satisfy Amero/Israeli interests, which is precisely why folks are out on the streets in millions, so wait you for we too are in waiting for a shift in gears!

best,

 

[faithandpeace]

May Allah (swt) grant Asmaa the highest realms of Jannah. May Allah (swt) alleviate the suffering of the righteous and innocent in Egypt, Syria, and throughout our ummah. May Allah (swt) help the evil wrongdoers see the truth and forgive those who sincerely repent and work to pay restitution for their crimes and for those who still do such evil and refuse to fix their hearts, may Allah (swt) give them the most severe punishment. May Allah (swt) grant victory to our ummah with the establishment of the khalifa and the restoration of justice through the implementation of sharia. May Allah (swt) help us to continue to have sabr and make du'as for justice and peace and to remain steadfast in the deen. Ameen.

 

[Independent]

You shouldn't use the first article that comes out of google under guradian UK and copy it almost word for word

No idea what you're on about.

So what is exactly relevant for you?

Depleted uranium is not a chemical weapon, it's used in munitions because it is very dense. As far as we know it hasn't been used in Syria and isn't relevant to Syria. Nor was it illegal at the time of the Gulf War, so again it is not relevant to the issue of illegal weapons.

btw we have already established that countries at least as far as ME is concerned who refused to sign this or that don't represent their people.

Whether or not you personally support these governments is irrelevant. No more relevant than whether i personally support the US or UK governments, neither of which I voted for. Also, Egypt was under MB rule for a year and they did not sign the treaty and renounce chemical weapons. The MB government is of course one you did support.

It remains the case that the use of chemical weapons in Syria is the responsibility of Assad and Russia, not the US. People worry about US intervention when Russia has been intervening like crazy since the first day of the war.

 

[جوري]

No idea what you're on about.

well of course not!

Depleted uranium is not a chemical weapon, it's used in munitions because it is very dense. As far as we know it hasn't been used in Syria and isn't relevant to Syria. Nor was it illegal at the time of the Gulf War, so again it is not relevant to the issue of illegal weapons.

I think the pictures and the conditions in Fallujah speak for themselves!
if it has no relevance to Syria then Syria has no relevance in a Mursi thread!
'Illegality' as decided by war mongers is in fact what is irrelevant here!

now take a hike and find a new word to use to sugar coat your war mongering!

 

[Independent]

well of course not!

Post the link.

if it has no relevance to Syria then Syria has no relevance in a Mursi thread!

You introduced it yourself. As usual, you are derailing the thread.

now take a hike and find a new word to use to sugar coat your war mongering!

It's you who favours war, not me.

 

[جوري]

Post the link.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/nov/15/usa.iraq
Dishonesty is a kaffir's trait!

You introduced it yourself. As usual, you are derailing the thread.

and if I did it makes me a pioneer and you a sycophant!

It's you who favours war, not me.

you prefer to label it legal is all!
I don't subscribe to your definitions for what my eyes see and I certainly don't subscribe to your solutions if you ever offered any'

 

[Independent]

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/nov/15/usa.iraq!

This bears little resemblance to what i wrote in content or style, so I don't know why you think I copied it. Just another random insult I guess.

Dishonesty is a kaffir's trait!

It's a human trait.

and if I did it makes me a pioneer and you a sycophant!

It's a source of constant amazement to me how you ever passed any medical exams with such a gadfly mind. Are you for real? You make statements and accusations, then reverse them five seconds later, without the slightest concern. You don't seem to care to follow any argument, make no attempt to examine facts, and above all never admit you got something wrong even when it is factually incontrovertible. You simply slip on to the next anti western statement.

you prefer to label it legal is all!
I don't subscribe to your definitions for what my eyes see and I certainly don't subscribe to your solutions if you ever offered any'

They are not 'my' definitions. It's not a question of my 'labelling' something illegal. It's a factual condition of international law.

Your personal opinion is of no consequence. It doesn't become 'illegal', simply because you think it ought to be. So when you continue to describe it as 'illegal' to others, you are - factually - indisputably - lying.

 

[جوري]

This bears little resemblance to what i wrote in content or style, so I don't know why you think I copied it. Just another random insult I guess.

Anymore obvious would make you a plagiarizer!

It's a human trait

It is a sub human trait. Islam elevates us from mere animals!

It's a source of constant amazement to me how you ever passed any medical exams with such a gadfly mind. Are you for real? You make statements and accusations, then reverse them five seconds later, without the slightest concern. You don't seem to care to follow any argument, make no attempt to examine facts, and above all never admit you got something wrong even when it is factually incontrovertible. You simply slip on to the next anti western statement.

What amuses you is irrelevant to me as is most of what you write- I have no better expectations nor would I consider a validation from your ilk any type of flattery. As for facts, Someone who is a paragraph short of plagiarizing is not an authority on the facts or how to sort through them!

They are not 'my' definitions. It's not a question of my 'labeling' something illegal. It's a factual condition of international law.

No, they're for the brainless and those whose hearts and minds are blind. The definitions of someone who is a hypocrite at best for seeing similar results on a similar set of population in the same region only elicit a response in dollars and cents and depending on who is doing the attack and also the timing of it and oh of course depending on who defined its legality. You no more care who lives, who is tortured or suffers, who is displaced or eradicated than any of the govt. you defend. I have already stated folks see through the transparency of your charade.
The 'Law' itself international or otherwise seems to change based on the person's religion and ethnicity as I have demonstrated in my previous thread 'It isn't a war on Islam or anything'
So who the heck are you or those whose laws you so like to tote and uphold and defend? Take a hike, until we clean another thread from the stench of your BS.

 

[Independent]

So who the heck are you or those whose laws you so like to tote and uphold and defend?

I don't make the law, i don't necessarily like the law. But it is factually 'the law' and to say otherwise is simply a lie, which you are repeating.

International law is notoriously messy because everyone has to agree. The Geneva Convention is flouted daily in Syria and many other warzones. But it's still better to try than to do nothing. On another day you'll be talking about how Israel ignores international law. But today, you don't care about international law. There is nothing fixed in your mind except bigotry against the greater part of mankind.

You no more care who lives, who is tortured or suffers

Yes i do, i don't want anyone to suffer like this. Whereas your issue is not the suffering itself, but the identity of who is suffering. If it was only kaffirs you wouldn't care, because in your worldview they deserve it = all of them - as you have made amply clear many times in the past.