podarock, how much do you know of my religion? just a question,,
but yes, and I'm saying no ideology is pure and clean in the sense that it doesn't call people to itself, and force them to cohere to it, in some way or other after wards, so this is a moot point, the stronger win, they control, then fall and it repeats, hasn;t much to do with forcing your opinion on ohters, everyone else does it too, in varying degrees, but it's still done.
there are timeless/absolute?-rules to history, as a society 'ages', as it becomes weaker and ready to be gobbled up by the 'barbarians at the gates', it accepts homosexuality/carnality in general more and more, homosexuality thus is not nesseciated but is a symptom of weakness, of a civilization/society that is.
this is why I at least think it's bad for the West in general to teach the young ones about it at an early age
I mean they imprint very easily, although 'deviance' from the usual maae/female pairing is easily dealt with if there isn't much pressure to the contrary, yet the West creates even more pressure, more coercion to conform to a somewhat defective sexual state, by defective I eman one that doesn't produce children, nor further the values of the traditional family, be it extended or nuclear.
note, I don't say defective as an insult.
it's hard to accept certain things, but 'truth' is not anyone's, not yet any way. the longer that is acknowledged, the better. case in point: the Western way is just one of many, neither true, nor absolute.