Post some good lectures about Prophet Muhammad :saws1:

[Scimitar]

starfleet command is 1400 lightyears away.

:|

and they brainwashed entire generations with "space, the final frontier"...

nope... TIME is the final frontier.

And I can prove it in sha Allah.

Scimi

 

[M.I.A.]

...all we need now is a flux capacitor.


cant leave me hangin.. how you going to prove it o_0

 

[Huzaifah ibn Adam]

In the case of war jihad - don't we need an emir? khaliph? else we be like, tyrants ourselves right?

Where is our khaliph? How do we justify it today?

Scimi

Having a Khaleefah is a requirement for offensive Jihaad (Jihaad-e-Talab, or "Iqdaami Jihaad"). This is the Jihaad for the purpose of expanding the dominion of Islaam. Conquering of lands for Islaam. Such a Jihaad requires there to be a Khaleefah, and a Khilaafah, etc.

However, defensive Jihaad (Difaa`i Jihaad) does not require a Khaleefah. For example, the Zionist Jews attack Palestine and start killing the innocent Muslims there; men, women and children. Killing them, bombing them, arresting them, torturing them, raping the girls, starving them, so much so that there isn't even food for the people to eat. In this case, the Palestinians do not require any "Khaleefah" in order for them to fight back. They are being attacked. Standing up and fighting the Jews is Fardh (obligatory). The Zionists are the Zhaalim invaders. Such a Jihaad is known as a "Difaa`i Jihaad" (Defensive Jihaad).

If someone attacks your family, then, the `Ulamaa have written that it becomes obligatory to defend them. Some gangsters break into your house and try to rape and kill your wife and daughters. Will a person say, "No, we can't do anything. A Khaleefah is necessary for Jihaad. We must just sit still and do nothing. Let them get raped and killed." Will any sane person say this? Obviously not. Hopefully not, at least. He will most definitely get up to defend his family. This defending of his family is obligatory upon him.

Similarly, wherever Muslims are attacked and oppressed, for them to defend themselves becomes Fardh (obligatory).

Let's say Donald Trump becomes president and decides to bomb Makkah and Madeenah, for example. Will any doubt remain in the mind of any person that Jihaad becomes Fardh-e-`Ayn and every Muslim has to stand up to defend Makkah and Madeenah?

والسلام​

 

[Scimitar]

Be a nice neighbor Scim

you might have found something I might like so share

If tears of joy do not manifest - the heart is cold. This is short but wow, I wish I was there in that gathering,

...all we need now is a flux capacitor.


cant leave me hangin.. how you going to prove it o_0

Join the whatsapp group, I shared everything in there.

I can do so again here, when "time" permits I have the "space" - that frontier is null and void

Scimi

 

[Scimitar]

Having a Khaleefah is a requirement for offensive Jihaad (Jihaad-e-Talab, or "Iqdaami Jihaad"). This is the Jihaad for the purpose of expanding the dominion of Islaam. Conquering of lands for Islaam. Such a Jihaad requires there to be a Khaleefah, and a Khilaafah, etc.

However, defensive Jihaad (Difaa`i Jihaad) does not require a Khaleefah. For example, the Zionist Jews attack Palestine and start killing the innocent Muslims there; men, women and children. Killing them, bombing them, arresting them, torturing them, raping the girls, starving them, so much so that there isn't even food for the people to eat. In this case, the Palestinians do not require any "Khaleefah" in order for them to fight back. They are being attacked. Standing up and fighting the Jews is Fardh (obligatory). The Zionists are the Zhaalim invaders. Such a Jihaad is known as a "Difaa`i Jihaad" (Defensive Jihaad).

If someone attacks your family, then, the `Ulamaa have written that it becomes obligatory to defend them. Some gangsters break into your house and try to rape and kill your wife and daughters. Will a person say, "No, we can't do anything. A Khaleefah is necessary for Jihaad. We must just sit still and do nothing. Let them get raped and killed." Will any sane person say this? Obviously not. Hopefully not, at least. He will most definitely get up to defend his family. This defending of his family is obligatory upon him.

Similarly, wherever Muslims are attacked and oppressed, for them to defend themselves becomes Fardh (obligatory).

Let's say Donald Trump becomes president and decides to bomb Makkah and Madeenah, for example. Will any doubt remain in the mind of any person that Jihaad becomes Fardh-e-`Ayn and every Muslim has to stand up to defend Makkah and Madeenah?

والسلام​

I agree with you here bro Huzaifah,

Problem is - not many know the difference, do they?

Shaikh Hamza Yusuf was 100% correct when he mentioned how if some people come to your house and aim to expel you from it, take your women and children etc - and you fight back for your property and your family - that this is defensive jihad and the whole world practices this whether they are religious or not.

Again - nuance.

You made a point of how kuffar cannot engage in jihad and slandered Hamza Yusuf for his saying that even kuffar can do jihad.

He cited an example of firefighters helping the survivors of the 911 incident - some of those firefighters were Muslim who lost their lives in the effort to save others. Why is their Jihaad accepted and not those of the Kuffar who helped to save lives and died in the process?

I believe you need to retract your statement from page one on this thread, with respect dear bro.

Scimi

 

[M.I.A.]

...i hope it does not come to that.

hypothetically if it did then the muslim countries that also have that capability would be the only ones with an answer.

conventional warfare simply would not work.. would only aggravate the masses who wish to remain unblemished.

..and tarnish those already considered tarnished.

but then a moment...

what exactly do you consider yourself as?

sodom and Gomorrah did not fall until lut left (pbuh)..

and yet he was not the one to make it fall. (pbuh)

strange days.

 

[Scimitar]

I have an hard time following your train of thought bro MIA.

In sha Allah you can explain in more conventional language

Scimi

 

[Huzaifah ibn Adam]

I maintain that the statement made by Hamza Yusuf is wrong, because he generalised saying that all of the firefighters were Mujaahideen and Shuhadaa, yet we know for a fact that a Kaafir cannot be a Mujaahid or a Shaheed.

In any case, we are derailing Kiro's thread, and he's already given me a negative rep for it, so we'll stop there.

والسلام​

 

[Scimitar]

I maintain that the statement made by Hamza Yusuf is wrong, because he generalised saying that all of the firefighters were Mujaahideen and Shuhadaa, yet we know for a fact that a Kaafir cannot be a Mujaahid or a Shaheed.

In any case, we are derailing Kiro's thread, and he's already given me a negative rep for it, so we'll stop there.

والسلام​

Post a video he will be happy with and continue the discussion in sha Allah - win/win.

Bro, I have seen that lecture which Shaikh Hamza delivered and I understand the context of what he was delivering, and explained it.

You seem to see a black and white context when Hamza has painted it in full colour for us.

If a man, a non Muslim, saves the life of his fellow man - it is as if he has saved the whole of humanity... if he dies saving that life? work the rest out yourself.

And Allahs mercy transcends his wrath.

Scimi

 

[Scimitar]

bump

 

[Kiro]

 

[M.I.A.]

...this... might take some time.

:|