Prove Allah exists

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which is why I stated in the same post: "the fact that humans have always had some sort of religion/mythology is proof that it is a part of human nature, nothing more."
But just because religion is a part of human nature does not mean god is real. That would be an appeal to belief.

Atheism is pretty much a belief system, you believe that God doesn't exist, you get organized, you make pamphlets of your doctrine and posters on buses

dawkins_bus_400.jpg



I hate to break it to you but another zealot extreme doesn't render null the others!

it is a question of logic which I suspect isn't your strong suit just given your very sophomoric arguments here..

all the best
 
Ew, we have those posters up on campus and I can't help but get a bad taste in my mouth whenever I see them.

You suspect wrong, but I suspect you don't have the answers.

Choose a subject and we can begin 101.
 
There is a little well kept secret amongst popstar atheists and their popular material, and that is that a surprising number of theists and monotheists habit the philosophy and meta-ethics faculties in all the great universities. This is where you're heading. Now where would you like to begin? Arguments based on intentionality? Collections and sets? Natural numbers? Counterfactuals or universal constants? The good old fashioned ontological argument? Induction? Putnamian? Morality and meaning?

I suspect that you are here to debate and not to find answers.

Your fancy shmancy degrees don't scare me.
 
Evolution explains the diversity of life. It also logically explains how life changes to better suit the environment. If there were an all-knowing being (Allah) why wouldn't he/she/it just create everything in a static state that was also perfectly made for the environment?
'evolution' doesn't explain the origins of life, and I assure you if I got down to the nitty gritty here with you, you'd run home to your mama..
as for the latter part of that statement.. I have no idea what that means? care to elaborate?
We live in a universe that is not fine-tuned for life. The Earth is the only known planet that is able to harbor life (not saying it is the only one, just the only one humans know of.) Put life anywhere else in the known universe and it will die instantly. This to me is a good argument AGAINST a benevolent god.
99% of all life that has ever existed is extinct. Why would an all-knowing being be so bad at creating life that his creations go extinct 99% of the time?
If it isn't fine tuned for life, it is a wonder how you are sitting here living, breathing with billions of perfect biochemical reactions working for you through no volition of your own, which you'd rather render to 'evolution' and yet have no understanding or clear delineation of origin or function.

and again, I ask you to refrain of speaking on specifics when the very rudiments are elusive to you, furthermore, we have no idea what your 'baseline' for benevolence is to entertain this, even if I were to take the leap outside the pedantic confines you've created!
What about life on other planets? Intelligent life? If there is intelligent somewhere else in the universe (I believe there is) did Allah send prophets to them to? Or are humans the only creation he cares about? Also, if Allah did send prophets to intelligent life on other planets, did he send the same prophets? Muslims claim that Muhammad is the last and final messenger of god. Well, what if intelligent life formed AFTER Muhammad's lifetime? Can Allah not send them a prophet, because that would mean Muhammad would cease to be the final messenger. Are they just out of luck?
If you have specific questions about the religion of Islam, then I assure you there is an answer to all of them, but then that would violate your own abstract in your opening statement... for it seems you constantly breech your own restrictions but at the same time not interested in a reply for most assuredly the reply will come from scriptures!
double standards?

Also, there is a verse in the Qur'an that states that Allah scattered life THROUGH OUT the universe. To me, that is saying that Allah created life on other planets. I will look up the verse later.
OK

Also, I will read your thread later. It is getting late and it is too long to read now.
Just as well..

all the best
 
Last edited:
Why can't you just answer my question?

Sorry, which question? Your imperative statement? Prove God exists! I'm not trying to intimidate you with knowledge. I am trying to show you that the amount of information there for the truly curious individual is MIND BOGGLING. Richard Dawkins hasn't published any formal academia for 6 years brother. His arguments may evoke an atheistic response in your average lay-reader, but you need to move beyond that if you intend to ask these large questions. Despite continuing formal training in philosophy, I spent 4 months last summer pouring over formal theistic arguments before I became firm in my belief in God.

It cannot be answered on a forum. However, if you're interested in material, I am glad to help. :)
 
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1337210 said:
'evolution' doesn't explain the origins of life, and I assure you if I got down to the nitty gritty here with you, you'd run home to your mama..
as for the latter part of that statement.. I have no idea what that means? care to elaborate?
If it isn't fine tuned for life, it is a wonder how you are sitting here living, breathing with billions of perfect biochemical reactions working for you through no volition of your own, which you'd rather render to 'evolution' and yet have no understanding or clear delineation of origin or function.

and again, I ask you to refrain of speaking on specifics when the very rudiments are elusive to you, furthermore, we have no idea what your 'baseline' for benevolence is to entertain this, even if I were to take the leap outside the pedantic confines you've created!
If you have specific questions about the religion of Islam, then I assure you there is an answer to all of them, but then that would violate your own abstract in your opening statement... for it seems you constantly breech your own restrictions but at the same time not interested in a reply for most assuredly the reply will come from scriptures!
double standards?

OK

Just as well..

all the best

1. I never said evolution explained the origin of life.

2. What I meant was, why couldn't an all-knowing being create all life in a static (non-changing) state. Why did he create an imperfect universe where life has to constantly correct itself through natural mechanisms such as natural selection?

3. How can you say life IS fine-tuned? It's easy to think that life is fine-tuned when living in a modern society, but if we were living in an unindustrialized country or living 200 or more years ago, we would be struggling to stay alive. In some places, people are lucky just to live into adulthood. The fact is, if life were put anywhere else in the known universe it would die instantly! Even on Earth, most forms of life would die if they were taken out of their ecosystems. Humans would die if were tried to live in the ocean. Oceans make up most of the planet, around 70%. That means that only a tiny portion of this Earth is "fine-tuned" for our survival.

Also, you completely ignored me when I said that 99% of all organisms have gone extinct. That is a fact. How can you say that the creator is all-knowing if 99% of his creations have gone extinct? Unless you claim that he wanted them to go extinct.

4. You didn't even respond to my question about extraterrestrial life. Which I find to be a very interesting topic. If there is intelligent life else where in the universe, did your god send prophets to them?
 
Despite continuing formal training in philosophy, I spent 4 months last summer pouring over formal theistic arguments before I became firm in my belief in God.

Well, I'm not some Dawkins worshiper just because I'm an atheist. I think Dawkins is a mundane version of what he once was. He was much more inspiring and influential in the 70s, I think.

Philosophy is all well and good, but since it is not testable, how can we be sure that any of it is true?
 
1. It's impossible to prove a negative. Since you are making the claim (that god exists) the burden of proof is on you.
But I do have an argument, here it is:

God supposedly gave man free will.
People whom are mentally ill or mentally retarded have limited control over their actions or impulses.
A mentally ill person in a comatose state or just a normal person in a coma have no free will.
Being that not everybody has free will over the actions of their bodies or the thoughts in their heads not all people were given free will.
If all people do not have free will then god could have not given all people free will.
We only sin because we have free will but since all people do not have free will sin does not exist
is that all you could come up with? HAHA
Evolution explains the diversity of life. It also logically explains how life changes to better suit the environment. If there were an all-knowing being (Allah) why wouldn't he/she/it just create everything in a static state that was also perfectly made for the environment?

We live in a universe that is not fine-tuned for life. The Earth is the only known planet that is able to harbor life (not saying it is the only one, just the only one humans know of.)
EXACTLY our little brains are limited... humans can only know so much but they can not claim to know everything. this is prove in itself that there is a more powerful being controlling everything so that we may ponder over everything. if we knew everything. it would ruin the test wouldn't it :)
I can't prove that god doesn't exist. Just like I can't prove that Santa Clause doesn't exist or that unicorns don't exist or that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist, etc.
Again, it's impossible to disprove a negative.
Do you have any proof that Allah exists?

I don't know what created the universe and I never claimed to. However, I don't believe it was created by Allah, obviously.
You are creating a red herring because you are trying to divert attention from the topic at hand.

My argument against Allah isn't drivel. This is a Muslim forum. Muslims believe that Allah gave man freewill and I gave an argument against it.

What argument is that? i can't see any strong argument you gave against it lol
 
1. I never said evolution explained the origin of life.
what was your purpose of injecting evolution in a thread about God's existence or non-existence?
2. What I meant was, why couldn't an all-knowing being create all life in a static (non-changing) state. Why did he create an imperfect universe where life has to constantly correct itself through natural mechanisms such as natural selection?
How is this an imperfection? as the environment changes we are given the abilities to adapt to it or die, to die is the human condition and it seems purposeful. if life were simply about existence then we'd have been better off as un-evolved cockroaches. what is the point of higher reticular function, and aesthetics, if it were merely about survival?

3. How can you say life IS fine-tuned? It's easy to think that life is fine-tuned when living in a modern society, but if we were living in an unindustrialized country or living 200 or more years ago, we would be struggling to stay alive. In some places, people are lucky just to live into adulthood. The fact is, if life were put anywhere else in the known universe it would die instantly! Even on Earth, most forms of life would die if they were taken out of their ecosystems. Humans would die if were tried to live in the ocean. Oceans make up most of the planet, around 70%. That means that only a tiny portion of this Earth is "fine-tuned" for our survival.
Again, I fail to see your point? what does life expectancy have to do with existence or non existence of God? Death was decreed upon us and from a theological perspective we are immortal beings, whose existence isn't bound by a number of years no matter how long or short in this life!
Also, you completely ignored me when I said that 99% of all organisms have gone extinct. That is a fact. How can you say that the creator is all-knowing if 99% of his creations have gone extinct? Unless you claim that he wanted them to go extinct.
Again, what is your point? what does all knowing have to do with what lives and what dies?
if you constantly beg to have a theological explanation then don't set your scene excluding God and scriptures..

what you consider being remiss is in fact one of God's signs

Allah (swt) continues to direct changes that we perceive as natural processes and the atheistic evolutionist interprets as naturalistic evolution. Surah 29:19-20 Do they not see how Allah originates creation then repeats its process? Surely it is easy for Allah. Say to them: "Travel through the earth and see how Allah originates the creation, then creates the later creation.”

Surat Al Ana’am, verse #59 Says “and He Has the keys of the unseen, none knows it but He, and He Knows what on the land and in the sea, not a leaf falls but He Knows about it, and not a grain in the darkness (depth) of the earth nor any thing wet or dry but in a very comprehensive book (record)”.

so I have no reason to believe that just simply because something is extinct, that God neglected it, or didn't know about it. You need to re-visit that and elucidate your meaning.. We are not immortal as far as earthly life is concerned!

Everything fulfills its very specific purpose and expires.




4. You didn't even respond to my question about extraterrestrial life. Which I find to be a very interesting topic. If there is intelligent life else where in the universe, did your god send prophets to them?
If God created other creatures then we have no reason to assume that he didn't send them their own messengers-- I wonder why you keep asking theologically specific questions when you have stated that you have no desire for that from the get go?

here is the Islamic stance:
It is part of the justice of Allaah that He does not punish any people until He has first sent a warning to them and unless there is evidence against them. Allaah does not treat anybody unfairly. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “… And We never punish until We have sent a Messenger (to give warning).” [al-Israa’ 17:15].
In his tafseer (commentary) on this aayah, Ibn Katheer (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: “These words, ‘…And We never punish until We have sent a Messenger (to give warning)’ tell us of the justice of Allaah, may He be exalted, and that He does not punish anyone until after He has established evidence against him by sending a Messenger to him. This is like the aayat (interpretation of the meaning): ‘… Every time a group is cast therein [into Hell], its keeper will ask, “Did no warner come to you?” They will say, “Yes indeed; a warner did come to us, but we belied him and said: ‘Allaah never sent down anything (of revelation), you are only in great error.’”’ [al-Mulk 67:8] and: ‘And those who disbelieved will be driven to Hell in groups, till, when they reach it, the gates thereof will be opened (suddenly like a prison at the arrival of its prisoners). And its keepers will say, “Did not the Messengers come to you from yourselves, - reciting to you the Verses of your Lord, and warning you of the Meeting of this Day of yours?” They will say: “Yes, but the Word of torment has been justified against the disbelievers!”’ [al-Zumar 39:71]…”
A person who has never heard of Islam or the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and who has never heard the message in its correct and true form, will not be punished by Allaah if he dies in a state of kufr (disbelief). If it were asked what his fate will be, the answer will be that Allaah will test him on the Day of Resurrection: if he obeys, he will enter Paradise and if he disobeys he will enter Hell. The evidence (daleel) for this is the hadeeth of al-Aswad ibn Saree’, who reported that the Prophet of Allaah SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There are four (who will protest) to Allaah on the Day of Resurrection: the deaf man who never heard anything, the insane man, the very old man, and the man who died during the fatrah (the interval between the time of ‘Eesaa (Jesus, upon whom be peace) and the time of Muhammad SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)). The deaf man will say, ‘O Lord, Islam came but I never heard anything.’ The insane man will say, ‘O Lord, Islam came but the children ran after me and threw stones at me.’ The very old man will say, ‘O Lord, Islam came but I did not understand anything.’ The man who died during the fatrah will say, ‘O Lord, no Messenger from You came to me.’ He will accept their promises of obedience, then word will be sent to them to enter the Fire. By the One in Whose hand is the soul of Muhammad, if they enter it, it will be cool and safe for them.”
According to another report, he said: “Whoever enters it, it will be cool and safe for him, and whoever does not enter it will be dragged to it.” (The hadeeth was reported by Imaam Ahmad and Ibn Hibbaan, and deemed saheeh by al-Albaani, Saheeh al-Jaami’, 881).
Everyone who hears the message of Islam in a sound and correct form (and rejects it), will have evidence aginst him. Whoever dies without having heard the message, or having heard it in a distorted form, then his case is in the hands of Allaah. Allaah knows best about His creation, and He will never treat anyone unfairly. And Allaah is All-Seer of His slaves.



so to answer your question and a point you'd previously raised.. all religions in fact have a bit of truth to them.. just like when you show up to a test and alot of the answers are possibly correct, it is a matter of which is most correct, rather than a mere opposition of one another.. the universal code and basic tenets don't change.. the question is how to cut through all the extraneous crap to get to pure unadulterated monotheism!

all the best
 
LOL. Kid I feel pity for you. You're just 19 and are hormonally charged. You have much to discover and experience in life.

I will only respond to your intelligent life and Prophet Muhammad pbuh argument. I've already raised that point on these forums here on my discussions with Islamirama. So its not your novel idea but I guess you never claimed it to be. This is my position after taking sophomore and junior astronomy courses and reading most recent literature and writing a 20 page essay on "how can life be detected on exoplanets (extra solar planets)." Since you atheists guys look for "credibility," I did that at one of the "harvards" of Canada and not at some "University of Creationism" as some of you like to say when trying to discredit others.

There is NO observable, testable and unbiased evidence that intelligent life exists elsewhere. No Earth-like exoplanet has been found. We have found many stars which have planets orbiting them but most of these planets are way way heavier and are called Hot Jupiters. The smallest exoplanet found has the mass of 5 Earths.

I dont believe intelligent life exists elsewhere till I find the evidence and I believe we will never find the evidence. Hence I believe Prophet Muhammad pbuh is the last messenger in this universe. I have that faith. You have your faith that intelligent life exists elsewhere. But your position is a weak one compared to mine as you are taking a positive position with no concrete evidence.
 
Last edited:
First, asking for just empirical evidence limits the types of answers you are going to get. Is there any particular reason you don't want an a priori argument for God's existence? Many of the most creative and thought provoking arguments come from strictly theoretical arguments.

Anyway,

1. God supposedly gave man free will.
2.People whom are mentally ill or mentally retarded have limited control over their actions or impulses.
3.A mentally ill person in a comatose state or just a normal person in a coma have no free will.
4.Being that not everybody has free will over the actions of their bodies or the thoughts in their heads not all people were given free will.
5.If all people do not have free will then god could have not given all people free will.
6.We only sin because we have free will but since all people do not have free will sin does not exist


I think your wording of the last line (that I have numbered 6) has confused you. It should read 'if one person does not have free will then sin does not exist' and then your argument can run deductively. Only problem is that the counter premise is easily 'only people with Free will sin' and that ruins your entire argument. I can't see how your argument could be repaired and I am forced to say it has failed.
 
i always thought the essense of the problem came down to, what started everything when clearly the universe couldnt start itself? the answer is "something". now you can start reasoning as to what qualities this "something" at square one has.

If god had no purpose for his creation then humans would not be able to freely think thats why religion is a necessity. (and btw the quran is a miracle, thats why its from Allah)
 
God supposedly gave man free will.
People whom are mentally ill or mentally retarded have limited control over their actions or impulses.
A mentally ill person in a comatose state or just a normal person in a coma have no free will.
Being that not everybody has free will over the actions of their bodies or the thoughts in their heads not all people were given free will.
If all people do not have free will then god could have not given all people free will.
We only sin because we have free will but since all people do not have free will sin does not exist

I'm sure even your fellow atheists are embarrassed with this extremely erroneous logic, if you even call that logic.
 
Simple question (or is it?)
Prove Allah exists.
No scripture, no theoretical nor pragmatic arguments. Show me some EMPIRICAL evidence!

A meaningless request as, if God did exist, he could be be responsible for any possible directly observable phenomena. Everything can be explained by the God hypothesis, which is one reason many people find it so attractive, and it is of course impossible to disprove a thesis that, by definition, explains everything there is.

Of course, most things can be explained by alternatives to God, in many cases rather more convincingly IMHO, and there is good reason to suspect that many of those that currently can't will eventually follow the pattern of history and fall into place. 'Everything', though? I very much doubt it.. and in that space religion will always exist, theistic or otherwise. Hence attempting to prove or disprove the existence of God is a totally futile pursuit except as an exercise in argumentation, as surely has been proved by the total failure of far greater minds than ours to do so over the course of the last two millennia or so.

Put another way, this sort of argument between theists and atheists is ultimately futile as while, if being intellectually honest, they might have to accept each other's arguments, that is pretty much irrelevant as they can never accept each others starting assumptions.
 
Last edited:
1. It's impossible to prove a negative. Since you are making the claim (that god exists) the burden of proof is on you.
But I do have an argument, here it is:

God supposedly gave man free will.
People whom are mentally ill or mentally retarded have limited control over their actions or impulses.
A mentally ill person in a comatose state or just a normal person in a coma have no free will.
Being that not everybody has free will over the actions of their bodies or the thoughts in their heads not all people were given free will.
If all people do not have free will then god could have not given all people free will.
We only sin because we have free will but since all people do not have free will sin does not exist

Your argument has many holes.

First of all - you have to understand what free will is. According to religion Allah gave you free will - However,
your actions are still governed by Allah - that is, from the point of view of how much freedom to act spontaneously
- you are not very different than a person in a comma - at least not from a religious point of view.

In fact, contrary to the unhealthy secular viewpoint, we view people in a coma or with different mental states as
equal to anybody else and view them just as humans like you and me - no difference.

The question of sin and what is sining is a very complicated one from a theological point of view. However, it seems
to me that you want to jump to the very complicated questions about religion and do not have yet a solid understanding of the basics (like the importance of giving, the contribution of a healthy religious community to the
overall health of society, prayer and Zakat..). Before you understand these things you would simply get confused over the other issues.

You see, Religion is a very complicated thing, much more than any science you can find - as it attempts to deal with
the overall human experience and the nature of our existence. It is good that you are asking question and I am sure
that if you would ask these questions with the will to find the answers you will also find them.
 
Last edited:
What I meant was, why couldn't an all-knowing being create all life in a static (non-changing) state. Why did he create an imperfect universe where life has to constantly correct itself through natural mechanisms

Ahhm. Finally some interesting questions in the Forum :)

Well, this is a very good question. A very good one.

The answer is that the world, in a sense, "already existed" in the state that you mentioned. However, this
existence is not really an existence. It is even more counterintuitive than that - the truth is that the world
does exist now in this "static state" - you simply do not know that.

You see - our state of existence is only one out of many possible one - However, to some extent one should
refer to our state as especially unique.

Now you might ask why is it like that?

You see, our existence is very fragile, there is a limit for how much we can take. This is why we have to go
through life step by step. Sometimes life could be very hard or very joyful and you cannot handle it all at
once - therefore you have to mature. Now - try and imagine what if life would crash on you all at one second -
that want be very nice would it? So we need to take it easy and go through things step by step.

Let me give you an example and this is the best example that I know.

Lets assume you have a book on a table. You haven't read it - does the story exist for you?

Well - you can say that the "static letters" exist - but you still have no idea what's in there.

Then you have to read the book - read it word by word - this would take you time - like two
weeks. But after you finish reading the book - it is there - and it is part of your experience - and
you do not need to read it again in order to recollect what has happened there. So in that sense
it went into a different state for you.

But what would happen, if like a computer, you would plug the book to your mind like a usb disc - your mind simply won't be able to take it - it would be a overload.

How can you say life IS fine-tuned? It's easy to think that life is fine-tuned when living in a modern society, but if we were living in an unindustrialized country or living 200 or more years ago, we would be struggling to stay alive. In some places, people are lucky just to live into adulthood. The fact is, if life were put anywhere else in the known universe it would die instantly! Even on Earth, most forms of life would die if they were taken out of their ecosystems. Humans would die if were tried to live in the ocean. Oceans make up most of the planet, around 70%. That means that only a tiny portion of this Earth is "fine-tuned" for our survival.

1. Life in modern world is very very untuned.

2. I would think that what you say should qualify as a miracle - won't it? If indeed we cannot live in 99% but yet still we are here - this is quite remarkable - isn't it?

, you completely ignored me when I said that 99% of all organisms have gone extinct. That is a fact. How can you say that the creator is all-knowing if 99% of his creations have gone extinct? Unless you claim that he wanted them to go extinct.

You are to stuck on the physical aspects of existence. The Physical world disintegrates and regenerates - this is
the nature of the physical world. In particular it contains death and decay - that's the way it is and that is the
way the world has been created.

You didn't even respond to my question about extraterrestrial life. Which I find to be a very interesting topic. If there is intelligent life else where in the universe, did your god send prophets to them?

Well, the answer is no as we are unique with respect to our role in creation.
 
Last edited:
In fact, contrary to the unhealthy secular viewpoint, we view people in a coma or with different mental states as
equal to anybody else and view them just as humans like you and me - no difference.

What 'secular viewpoint'? The issue is an important general ethical one, with significant differences opinion between atheists/secularists/humanists. Theists don't have a monopoly on morality, much as some might like to kid themselves that they do.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top