Questions about the Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter lyesh
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 121
  • Views Views 16K
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Peace Seven:

Yes, they could very well be from a Jewish sect...but if you researched, you will know that they don't know who wrote the scrolls found at Qumran. There is a lot of problems with these scrolls. Starting with the fact that there were not made public until loooong after they were found and many religious leaders offered their own interpretation of them before anyone else saw them. Sadly, these translations have been accepted as factual, when they are not.

Peace,
Hana

Its funny that you said earlier, only in 91 were they made public. There were 11 caves, cave 4 is what was made public in 91(40%). All the others were made public previous too. And as for the writers,,,its been proven that it was a Jewish sect. Not just by Christians..The minority believe otherwise, with no real cause.
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

You are basing this clam on only one of the books from the DDS, there were 19 on the Book of Isaiah only..So I question your conclusion. Because you have narrowed it down to a select group. Then how can you excavate Fact from one piece of the puzzle.
Peace Seven:

Show me where all 19 survived with ZERO damage and no need to go to other sources to fill in the blanks.

There were also duplicate scrolls found written by different scribes....show me where the original source is? Who copied from who? Not only that, in some of these "duplicates" there were alterations. Who did that and why?

You need to look past just the DDS themselves, you have to look at society back then and what was going on at the time. Don't put all your eggs in one basket, Seven. There are many things to learn and know about the DDS, it is far more than a piece of old paper, most of which is in fragments.

Instead of looking for excuses to justify "filling in the blanks", look for logic, look for answers. Don't dismiss changes from one scroll to another...research and find out WHY this might have happened and WHEN.

Peace,
Hana
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Its funny that you said earlier, only in 91 were they made public. There were 11 caves, cave 4 is what was made public in 91(40%). All the others were made public previous too. And as for the writers,,,its been proven that it was a Jewish sect. Not just by Christians..The minority believe otherwise, with no real cause.
Peace Seven:
No, no, friend, none of them were made public at the time they were discovered. They were tucked away and hidden for a number of years. Of course the ones written before Jesus, pbuh, weren't written by Christians. :p There were no Christians before Jesus, pbuh. Chances are the scribes were from a Jewish sect, yes....but they don't know with 100% certainty which group wrote what. They only have speculation. The original thought of the Qumran scrolls has changed dramatically as to who wrote them. That's why I said, it goes far deeper than a piece of paper.

Peace,
Hana
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Peace Seven:

Show me where all 19 survived with ZERO damage and no need to go to other sources to fill in the blanks.

There were also duplicate scrolls found written by different scribes....show me where the original source is? Who copied from who? Not only that, in some of these "duplicates" there were alterations. Who did that and why?

You need to look past just the DDS themselves, you have to look at society back then and what was going on at the time. Don't put all your eggs in one basket, Seven. There are many things to learn and know about the DDS, it is far more than a piece of old paper, most of which is in fragments.

Instead of looking for excuses to justify "filling in the blanks", look for logic, look for answers. Don't dismiss changes from one scroll to another...research and find out WHY this might have happened and WHEN.

Peace,
Hana
Those who question the claims of an authentic Septuagint point out that there is no one manuscript that can be labeled with the word "Septuagint". Instead, the Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, and Codex Alexandrinus specifically identify each book by its specific title. The title "Septuagint" is of course one given by scholars to differentiate from the seven or more other Greek versions of the Old Testament, most of which do not survive except as fragments.

All these codices do not differ in any substantive detail, and it is surprising that there are perhaps but two thousand instances of typographical error in such a lengthy collection of hand-copied ancient documents. However, there are many small, yet substantive differences with the newer Masoretic texts written in Hebrew.

Now with the above, I would have to question what you call logic.

Like the New Testament, the LXX is a particularly excellent text when compared to other ancient works with textual variants. To reject the existence of a Septuagint on the grounds of typographical error and other variants is a questionable opinion. Moreover, in many of the places where the LXX differs from the Masoretic Text, the same variants exist in the Dead Sea Scrolls, showing the antiquity of some of these variants and the reliability of the LXX.
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Peace Seven:
No, no, friend, none of them were made public at the time they were discovered. They were tucked away and hidden for a number of years. Of course the ones written before Jesus, pbuh, weren't written by Christians. :p There were no Christians before Jesus, pbuh. Chances are the scribes were from a Jewish sect, yes....but they don't know with 100% certainty which group wrote what. They only have speculation. The original thought of the Qumran scrolls has changed dramatically as to who wrote them. That's why I said, it goes far deeper than a piece of paper.

Peace,
Hana

Some of the documents were published in a prompt manner: all of the writing found in Cave 1 appeared in print between 1950 and 1956; the finds from 8 different caves were released in a single volume in 1963; and 1965 saw the publication of the Psalms Scroll from Cave 11. Translation of these materials quickly followed.



the finds from Cave 4 were not made public for many years. Access to the scrolls was governed by a "secrecy rule" that allowed only the original International Team or their designates to view the original materials. After de Vaux's death in 1971, his successors repeatedly refused to even allow the publication of photographs of these materials so that other scholars could at least make their judgments. This rule was eventually broken: first by the publication in the fall of 1991 of 17 documents reconstructed from a concordance that had been made in 1988 and had come into the hands of scholars outside of the International Team; next, that same month, by the discovery and publication of a complete set of photographs of the Cave 4 materials at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California, that were not covered by the "secrecy rule". After some delays these photographs were published by Robert Eisenman and James Robinson (A Facsimile Edition of the Dead Sea Scrolls, two volumes, Washington, D.C., 1991). As a result, the "secrecy rule" was lifted, and publication of the Cave 4 documents soon commenced, with five volumes in print by 1995.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls#Publication
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Peace Seven:

I see you have resorted to copy/pasting. :rollseyes My concern with you doing that is it makes me believe even more you don't have an understanding of what you're trying to "prove". But, it's ok, this is wikipedia's short description of Codex Vaticanus. Nothing here saying it was God's word and if it was, it's been altered, not preserved.

The Greek is written continuously with small neat writing, later retraced by a 11th century scribe. Punctuation is rare (accents and breathings have been added by a later hand) except for some blank spaces, diaeresis on intial iotas and upsilons, abbreviations of the nomina sacra and markings of OT citations.

The manuscript contains mysterious double dots (so called "umlauts") in the margin of the New Testament, which seem to mark places of textual uncertainty. There are 795 of these in the text and around another 40 that are uncertain. The date of these markings are disputed among scholars.


Codex Sinaiticus

The entire codex consists of 346 1/2 folios, written in four columns. Of these 199 belong to the Old Testament and 147 1/2 to the New, along with two other books, the Epistle of Barnabas and part of The Shepherd of Hermas. The books of the New Testament are arranged in this order: the four Gospels, the epistles of Paul, the Acts of the Apostles, the Catholic Epistles, Revelation.

Of its prior history, little is known. It is speculated to have been written in Egypt and it is sometimes associated with the 50 copies of the scriptures commissioned by Roman Emperor Constantine after his conversion to Christianity

A paleographical study at the British Museum in 1938 found additional the text had undergone several corrections. The first corrections were done by several scribes before the manuscript left the scriptorium. In the sixth or seventh century many alterations were made, which, according to a colophon at the end of the book of Esdras and Esther states, that the source of these alterations was "a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyr Pamphylus". From this is concluded, that it had been in Caesarea Palaestina in the 6th or 7th centuries. (Bruce A. Metzger, the Text of the New Testament, it's Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, Oxford University Press, 1992, p46).


Codex Alexandrinus

The manuscript's original provenance is unknown. A 13th or 14th century Arabic note on folio 1 reads: "Bound to the Patriarchal Cell in the Fortress of Alexandria. Whoever removes it thence shall be excommunicated and cut off. Written by Athanasius the humble."[1] A 17th century Latin note on a flyleaf (from binding in a royal library) states that the manuscript was given to a patriarchate of Alexandria in 1098 (donum dedit cubicuo Patriarchali anno 814 Mrtyrum), although this may well be "merely an inaccurate attempt at deciphering the Arabic note by Athanasius."[2] The codex was brought to Constantinople in 1621 by Cyril Lucar (patriarch of Alexandria then Constantinople) who then presented it to Charles I of England in 1627, thus becoming part of the Royal Library, British Museum and now the British Library.


Changes, alterations, corrections, unknown sources, authors, etc., written long after Jesus, pbuh....little wonder we don't believe these are the true words of God.

Peace,
Hana
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Some of the documents were published in a prompt manner: all of the writing found in Cave 1 appeared in print between 1950 and 1956; the finds from 8 different caves were released in a single volume in 1963; and 1965 saw the publication of the Psalms Scroll from Cave 11. Translation of these materials quickly followed.



the finds from Cave 4 were not made public for many years. Access to the scrolls was governed by a "secrecy rule" that allowed only the original International Team or their designates to view the original materials. After de Vaux's death in 1971, his successors repeatedly refused to even allow the publication of photographs of these materials so that other scholars could at least make their judgments. This rule was eventually broken: first by the publication in the fall of 1991 of 17 documents reconstructed from a concordance that had been made in 1988 and had come into the hands of scholars outside of the International Team; next, that same month, by the discovery and publication of a complete set of photographs of the Cave 4 materials at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California, that were not covered by the "secrecy rule". After some delays these photographs were published by Robert Eisenman and James Robinson (A Facsimile Edition of the Dead Sea Scrolls, two volumes, Washington, D.C., 1991). As a result, the "secrecy rule" was lifted, and publication of the Cave 4 documents soon commenced, with five volumes in print by 1995.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls#Publication

Ummmm, as I said, none were made public immediately after their discovery. The ones that were hidden for a lot longer must have been hidden for a reason. Robert Eisenman was diligent in his efforts to make them public and to be studied by authentic archeologists with no ulterior motives. He, along with others, were successful in that endeavor. That is why we now have the more accurate translations available to us.

Peace,
Hana
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Well I do agree with you, I was simply stating that they have found 19 Books of Isaiah, one of which was 75% completed. Also, with the other 18, there was enough to make a completed book of Isaiah. And yes the books found in the cave would be more like Islam..Why..well you live by the Law, just as the Jewish people's do. I believe the Law is the schoolmaster..Do you think that you can follow the Law to a tee,,some can..But there hearts are far from it. So they Sin internally. They make clean the outside of the cup, but the inside is full of dead mans bones.. Also, the reason there are so many anti-christian material in the Dead Sea Scrolls is because the Jews rejected Christ..and were teaching there own interpretation of the scriptures.. But that is not the Jews fault. Satan has blinded their eyes..God has a special plan for the Jewish people..They will be saved.

Peace Seven:

I missed this post. Actually, as a Christian, following what Jesus, pbuh, truly taught, you're suppose to be following the law as well. I can't say I've read anything anti-christian in the DDS, but I can say I believe I've read where scribes took liberties and altered things.

But, now you have a problem, Seven. You can't use the DDS as the basis of proving the authenticity of the bible while also saying it is anti-christian and altered by Jewish scribes.

You can't pick and choose and say "this part confirms it, but this part is wrong." It comes back to my point that it can't be used for proving anything, it can only give us a great insight as to the life and times of those living in that era and some of their traditions and beliefs.

Peace
Hana
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

:sl:

I have edited some posts containing offensive material and deleted off-topic/offensive posts aswell. Please remember to discuss in a respectful manner and stay on topic, Insha'Allaah.

I have also asked the thread starter to edit out offensive material in his post.

Peace.
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Greetings and peace be with you Mohammad;
Please remember to discuss in a respectful manner
I think it may be extremely difficult to stay respectful when responding to a thread with a seemingly offensive title.

I honestly feel that if we are to talk about someone else’s faith then we would bring a far greater glory to God if we search for what is best
I have also asked the thread starter to edit out offensive material in his post
I see that the original post has just been edited but I still find it offensive, and I feel sad that I cannot see a way of responding that will bring any peace to this thread.

We must pray for salvation for each other and hope that God in his infinite love will be merciful to us all.

In the spirit of searching for a greater understanding between our faiths

Eric
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Greetings Eric,

I think it may be extremely difficult to stay respectful when responding to a thread with a seemingly offensive title.
I've changed it now.

I see that the original post has just been edited but I still find it offensive, and I feel sad that I cannot see a way of responding that will bring any peace to this thread.
The post has also been edited.

May God guide us to the truth.

Peace.
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

Greetings and peace be with you Muhammad;

Thank you for the edit, and let us pray for a respectful thread once more.

God bless you

Eric
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

:sl:

Ppl...wake up...did you noe know that the Bible was written by Jews? The real bible is hidden so is the torah.
The real torah will never mention matters such as:

'Isa is in his own semen'. Why would God want to write this for?

:w:
Ameeratul layls friend
Where are they hidden?
 
Peace be upon yall and mercy from Almighty G-d and blessings.

I seemed to have missed this thread so I will G-d willing just type some comments in order for me to derive good from this and come to a better understanding.

First,
Ppl...wake up...did you noe know that the Bible was written by Jews? The real bible is hidden so is the torah.
The real torah will never mention matters such as:

'Isa is in his own semen'. Why would God want to write this for?

I have never in my entire life read anything of this nature in the Bible's Old Testament, if possible please give us some reference.

To proceed, Seven I have some interest in your points,

Guess what,,Christ took on human form..Why,,,because, you know yourself God required Blood according to the Torah, to forgive sin..

Just would like to know if you could show us where it is stated or examples that Sin can only be cleansed through blood, show us that "G-d required Blood according to the Torah"

Although it would be interesting to discuss the rest of that post, in order not to stray to far I will leave it there, G-d willing.

Proceeding,

I don't know about your God..But mine is just in all his ways..If he just forgave sin,,that would not be justice,,so why would I believe in him then.

I ask why would He not be just? G-d as you agree, I believe, is The Creator of the heavens and the earth, He is the law giver, the one who sets the law, He does not have to answer to any type of UN group.

Now G-d made us, he knows and made us not perfect, he has created us unable to be 100% obidient, thus it is only Just for G-d to have Mercy and forgive us. If he didnt then it would have been an unjust scenario.

So if G-d created us like this, weak and in knowledge that we are sinners, then why would He not forgive us without a need of sacrafice.

Now if your saying G-d made laws about this and He needs to keep to those laws to be Just then thats a different view point.

Moving on,
thw Quran has been translated into other languages and will see revision also. So I don't think that this should be a matter at all.

Now, the Qu'ran, meaning the Mushaf, the written scripture is in Arabic, that Arabic Text has not seen any revision.

The different languages in which the Arabic Text has been interpreted by a person and then translated, that can have revisions for no Muslim will say that is the Word of G-d.

The Bible as we have now, has revisions, which leave out certain parts from the bulk text, as I will show in a bit, G-d willing, also this is what the Preface of the Revised Standard Version (illustrated) says with regards to the King James Version:

On Page iii of Preface:

The King James Version had to compete with the Geneva Bible in popular use; but in the end it prevailed, and for more than two and a half centuries no other authorized translation of the Bible into English was made. The King James Version became the "Authorize Version" of the English-speaking peoples.

..................

Yet the King James Version has grave defects. By the middle of the nineteenth centure, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision of the English translation.

So then the RVS was made, by aparently no less that 32 scholars. (preface iv)

Now to some differences:

1 Epistle of John Chapter 5

Kings James Version:

6This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.

7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

8And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

I copied the verses from here to save me writing them out

English Standard Version (since I could not find the Revised Standard Version)

6This is he who came by water and blood--Jesus Christ; not by the water only but by the water and the blood. And the Spirit is the one who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth.

7For there are three that testify:

8the Spirit and the water and the blood; and these three agree.

New Internation Version (known widely as NIV):

6This is the one who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ. He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth.

7For there are three that testify:

8the[a] Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.


Footnote

1 John 5:8 Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 8 And there are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek manuscript before the sixteenth century)

Now in case you didnt notice the differences here:

The King James version has the full verses, then the English Revised Version takes away verse 7 and splits verse 8 into 2 so that the verse numbers are still the same, but no mention of this in the footnotes, then finally in the New Internation Version the same split as the English Revised Version is used but now a footnote is provided informing the reader that the passage is not found in any Greek manyscript before the 16 century.

Another example can be found in, The Gospel According To Mark, which is held to be the earliest one, in Chapter 16,

The King James Version says,

Mark 16

1And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.

2And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.

3And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre?

4And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.

5And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.

6And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.

7But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.

8And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid.

9Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.

10And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.

11And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.

12After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.

13And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them.

14Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen.

15And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

17And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;

18They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

19So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.

20And they went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following. Amen.

The English Revised Version says,

The Resurrection
1When the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Salome bought spices, so that they might go and anoint him. 2And very early on the first day of the week, when the sun had risen, they went to the tomb. 3And they were saying to one another, "Who will roll away the stone for us from the entrance of the tomb?" 4And looking up, they saw that the stone had been rolled back--it was very large. 5And entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, dressed in a white robe, and they were alarmed. 6And he said to them, "Do not be alarmed. You seek Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has risen; he is not here. See the place where they laid him. 7But go, tell his disciples and Peter that he is going before you to Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you." 8And they went out and fled from the tomb, for trembling and astonishment had seized them, and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.

[Some of the earliest manuscripts do not include 16:9-20.]
Jesus Appears to Mary Magdalene
9[a] [[Now when he rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, from whom he had cast out seven demons. 10She went and told those who had been with him, as they mourned and wept. 11But when they heard that he was alive and had been seen by her, they would not believe it.


Jesus Appears to Two Disciples
12After these things he appeared in another form to two of them, as they were walking into the country. 13And they went back and told the rest, but they did not believe them.


The Great Commission
14Afterward he appeared to the eleven themselves as they were reclining at table, and he rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they had not believed those who saw him after he had risen. 15And he said to them, "Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation. 16Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. 17And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover."



19So then the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken to them, was taken up into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God. 20And they went out and preached everywhere, while the Lord worked with them and confirmed the message by accompanying signs.]]

Then it states this, as a footnote:

Mark 16:9 Some manuscripts end the book with 16:8; others include verses 9-20 immediately after verse 8. A few manuscripts insert additional material after verse 14; one Latin manuscript adds after verse 8 the following: But they reported briefly to Peter and those with him all that they had been told. And after this, Jesus himself sent out by means of them, from east to west, the sacred and imperishable proclamation of eternal salvation. Other manuscripts include this same wording after verse 8, then continue with verses 9-20

The New Internation Version says,

Mark 16
The Resurrection
1When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices so that they might go to anoint Jesus' body. 2Very early on the first day of the week, just after sunrise, they were on their way to the tomb 3and they asked each other, "Who will roll the stone away from the entrance of the tomb?"

4But when they looked up, they saw that the stone, which was very large, had been rolled away. 5As they entered the tomb, they saw a young man dressed in a white robe sitting on the right side, and they were alarmed.

6"Don't be alarmed," he said. "You are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who was crucified. He has risen! He is not here. See the place where they laid him. 7But go, tell his disciples and Peter, 'He is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you.' "

8Trembling and bewildered, the women went out and fled from the tomb. They said nothing to anyone, because they were afraid.
((The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20.))
9When Jesus rose early on the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had driven seven demons. 10She went and told those who had been with him and who were mourning and weeping. 11When they heard that Jesus was alive and that she had seen him, they did not believe it.

12Afterward Jesus appeared in a different form to two of them while they were walking in the country. 13These returned and reported it to the rest; but they did not believe them either.

14Later Jesus appeared to the Eleven as they were eating; he rebuked them for their lack of faith and their stubborn refusal to believe those who had seen him after he had risen.

15He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation. 16Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. 17And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well."

19After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God. 20Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.


Again in case the difference was not noticed, in the King James Version, it seems the writers were oblivious to the later knowledge of the other two versions, but in the English Revised Version, we are told 'some' manuscripts do not have this and we are given a footnote to some alternative endings. Finally it is in the New Internation Version that we are told "The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20"

Let our eyes again look at the King James Version, in the Gospel According to John Chapter 7 and 8,

50Nicodemus saith unto them, (he that came to Jesus by night, being one of them,)

51Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

52They answered and said unto him, Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet.

53And every man went unto his own house.
John 8

1Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.

2And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.

3And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

4They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

5Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

6This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

7So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

8And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

9And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

10When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

11She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

12Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

13The Pharisees therefore said unto him, Thou bearest record of thyself; thy record is not true.

14Jesus answered and said unto them, Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true: for I know whence I came, and whither I go; but ye cannot tell whence I come, and whither I go.

15Ye judge after the flesh; I judge no man.

Also the English Revised Version,

50Nicodemus, who had gone to him before, and who was one of them, said to them, 51"Does our law judge a man without first giving him a hearing and learning what he does?" 52They replied, "Are you from Galilee too? Search and see that no prophet arises from Galilee."

[The earliest manuscripts do not include John 7:53-8:11]
The Woman Caught in Adultery
53[g] [[They went each to his own house,
John 8
1but Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2Early in the morning he came again to the temple. All the people came to him, and he sat down and taught them. 3The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst 4they said to him, "Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. 5Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. So what do you say?" 6This they said to test him, that they might have some charge to bring against him. Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger on the ground. 7And as they continued to ask him, he stood up and said to them, "Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her." 8And once more he bent down and wrote on the ground. 9But when they heard it, they went away one by one, beginning with the older ones, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before him. 10Jesus stood up and said to her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" 11She said, "No one, Lord." And Jesus said, "Neither do I condemn you; go, and from now on sin no more."]]


I Am the Light of the World
12Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." 13So the Pharisees said to him, "You are bearing witness about yourself; your testimony is not true." 14Jesus answered, "Even if I do bear witness about myself, my testimony is true, for I know where I came from and where I am going, but you do not know where I come from or where I am going. 15You judge according to the flesh; I judge no one.

Also footnote G comments on,

John 7:53 Some manuscripts do not include 7:53-8:11; others add the passage here or after 7:36 or after 21:25 or after Luke 21:38, with variations in the text

And finally the New International Standard Version,

50Nicodemus, who had gone to Jesus earlier and who was one of their own number, asked, 51"Does our law condemn anyone without first hearing him to find out what he is doing?"

52They replied, "Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet[e] does not come out of Galilee."
((The earliest and most reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have John 7:53-8:11.))
53Then each went to his own home.
John 8

1But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" 6They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." 8Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

9At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

11"No one, sir," she said.
"Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."
The Validity of Jesus' Testimony
12When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."

13The Pharisees challenged him, "Here you are, appearing as your own witness; your testimony is not valid."

14Jesus answered, "Even if I testify on my own behalf, my testimony is valid, for I know where I came from and where I am going. But you have no idea where I come from or where I am going. 15You judge by human standards; I pass judgment on no one.

A recap, the King James Version had no warning but ran smothly, whilst the English Revised Version stated "The earliest manuscripts do not include John 7:53-8:11" and it was closely followed by the New Internation Version which stated further that, "The earliest and most reliable manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have John 7:53-8:11."

It would only be logical for a person to then out of these three follow the NIV.

With regards to this comment made:

I believe my Bible is the only word of God. Is God so small as to let man Corrupt it..Not the God I serve.

I as a Muslim, one who does Islam, which is one who Submits to G-d (as the Bible recomends in James 4:7), agree with you that if G-d wills, He can do anything He wants, including the presevation of Scripture, that is why I as a Muslim have reassurance that the Qu'ran will be preserved. For He states, in the english translation of the meaning:

Surah 15 Ayah 9
YUSUFALI: We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption).

But also before Embracing Islam, checking whether the Qu'ran could be the same as it was revealed was neccesary, so it should be with anyone and their faith.

In Islam we do not see the fact that Jesus' and Moses', peace be upon them both, their families and those who follow them, teachings and scriptures were not preserved because G-d couldnt but rather because those were guidance for a time and period, and that time and period have passed, with regards to Jesus peace be upon him and his family and his followers, Almighty G-d says in the translation of the meaning:

Surah 3 ayah 49
YUSUFALI: "And (appoint him) a messenger to the Children of Israel, (with this message): "'I have come to you, with a Sign from your Lord, in that I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah's leave: And I heal those born blind, and the lepers, and I quicken the dead, by Allah's leave; and I declare to you what ye eat, and what ye store in your houses. Surely therein is a Sign for you if ye did believe;


Thus, for example if I had a letter with a message to be delivered to 5 people. I would ensure that the message would be given to them in the same way I wrote it, but as soon as those people died or passed away or as soon as I needed to change the message, the letter containg old message could be thrown away or burnt, since the need for it is not there no more.

I hope this makes sense, and I am not asking you that you believe this, just that you understand my view point as I will try understand yours for that is the best we can do as fellow humans, the guidance and mercy of faith comes only from Almighty G-d.

Moving onto my last point G-d willing cos I have work soon:

The oldest book of the OT was written approximately 80 years after Jesus,pbuh, was taken up, and the rest later. Absolutely nothing was written in the lifetime of Jesus, pbuh. And the OT books were not authored by the disciples of Jesus, pbuh. Again, these books were written on hearsay, folklore and tradition.

I am hoping here you mean NT for New Testament and not OT for Old Testament, InshAllah.

Also

Can you explain why John is so vastly different from the 4 synoptics?

3 sypnotic, Matthew, Mark and Luke.

I hope to learn more from both of you two, specially you sis! InshAllah.

I enjoyin everyone to keep the interfaith communication honourable please.

I also hope I have not come across as offensive or as if I have being trying to belittle the Bible, that was not my intention but only to share what I have learnt and my view point on the matter, if I am mistaken please anyone correct me, InshAllah, G-d willing.

May Jesus son of Mary be Immiune from any lies spread about him or his family by Christians or Muslims, and may he be blessed along with his family and his followers.

Muslims please remember what was said to the last Prophet peace be upon him by The Creator, in the translation of the meaning:

It is true thou wilt not be able to guide every one, whom thou lovest; but Allah guides those whom He will and He knows best those who receive guidance.
 
Last edited:
Just would like to know if you could show us where it is stated or examples that Sin can only be cleansed through blood, show us that "G-d required Blood according to the Torah"

Some would say that the example of Cain and Abel shows the kind of sacrifice God wanted:
Genesis 4:
3. And in the process of time it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord.
4. Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering,
5. but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell.

But even before that, after Adam and Eve sinned, how was their sin cleansed? We are not specifically told, but notice how they tried to cover their nakedness with fig leaves and then notice how God did it:

Genesis 3:
7. Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings.
21. Also for Adam and his wife the Lord God made tunics of skin, and clothed them.

An animal had to die to provide "tunics of skin." That would have been the first blood sacrifice.

But perhaps more to the point of your question:

Exodus 12 tells of the institution of the Passover when the death angel would pass over houses where he saw the blood on the doorposts. That event, of course, did not specifically relate to sin or the cleansing of it, but did point to the importance blood would play later after the Law was given, at least in a symbolic way. The idea is sin brings death. Blood brings cleansing of sin, thereby avoiding sin's death penalty.

Leviticus 17:11 says, `For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.'

Hebrews 9:22 says, "And according to the law almost all things are purged with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission [i.e., forgiveness]."

I ask why would He not be just? G-d as you agree, I believe, is The Creator of the heavens and the earth, He is the law giver, the one who sets the law, He does not have to answer to any type of UN group.

Now G-d made us, he knows and made us not perfect, he has created us unable to be 100% obidient, thus it is only Just for G-d to have Mercy and forgive us. If he didnt then it would have been an unjust scenario.

So if G-d created us like this, weak and in knowledge that we are sinners, then why would He not forgive us without a need of sacrafice.

Now if your saying G-d made laws about this and He needs to keep to those laws to be Just then thats a different view point.

We can't really say God made us not perfect. We were born that way--- not perfect. Adam and Eve were the only ones made or directly created by God, and they were "very good" (Gen. 1:31) when first created. They were made "perfect" in terms of sinless, before they disobeyed God. But obviously things changed after they sinned. And their sin did not infect only them. We see their son, Cain, murdering his brother, Abel. What all of Adam's children, down to us, were born with is a sin nature---the tendency and inclination to commit willful acts of sin. Call it part of "original sin" or the effects of it or whatever. But it is undeniable that no one needs to be taught how to disobey. That comes naturally. What we need is, to be taught how to obey.

Nevertheless, God's standard is perfection. Jesus said, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Matt. 5:48). His standard IS 100% obedience.

So, we don't get off the hook and have our sins simply overlooked by God. You sin, you pay for it. And all of us sin, perhaps daily, if not hourly, in word, thought or deed.

His justice requires punishment for ALL sin. To overlook a single sin without the person committing it being punished goes against His justice. Just as much so as punishing someone who did not commit that sin goes against His justice... UNLESS a person steps in and volunteers to take the punishment, so the real guilty party can go free. That is exactly what Jesus did on our behalf when He died on the Cross for our sins. He paid for them IN FULL!

Hebrew 9:
24. For Christ has not entered the holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us;
25. not that He should offer Himself often, as the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood of another
26. He then would have had to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now, once at the end of the ages, He has appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.
27. And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment,
28. so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many.

Peace
 
Last edited:
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

I'll just let you know there is only one true God and one true Bible. But I guess you will find that out judgement day.
It seems you think you have already found the riht way,but still I advice you to find the right way before the day of judgement,Unless you wiil be among the losers.
 
Re: The GOD of the corrupted Bible gets drunk?!

It seems you think you have already found the right way, but still I advise you to find the right way before the day of judgment, unless you will be among the losers.

There are going to be billions of losers at the judgment, regardless of who has found the right way now. If Christianity is TRUTH and the Bible has not been corrupted (at least to the point that we can ignore everything it says), there will be billions of Muslims and non-Muslims who will be told by the Judge:

Matthew 7:23 --- ..."I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."

Matthew 25:
41. Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
46. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

And if the Quran is TRUTH, billions of Christians and non-Muslim non-Christians and countless Muslims who have not done whatever the Quran says, will have that same fate.

Either way, there will be billions of losers at the judgment. That conclusion is inescapable.

Peace
 
Re: Did you read Holy Quran ? How it is different from ur holy Book ?

In NT , about Jesus ‘s (p) forgiving the prostitute , I was confused . Does it mean , Jesus (p) sanctioned adultery / prostitution ? It can’t be so .
Greetings, Muslim Woman

Just for clarification, Jesus did not condone adultery or prostitution, nor any other sin.
Forgiving and condoning are two very different things ...

Read Jesus' words:
The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him. But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her. "Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground. At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?" "No one, sir," she said. "Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin." (John 8:3-15)
Jesus forgives her sins, but at the same time he tells her to stop sinning.
He frequently told people 'to leave their lives of sin' after he had healed them.

This reflects much of the Christian thinking:
Christians do not try to live good lives to earn God's favour - they have already gained it through faith.
Instead they try to live good lives, because they know it is what God wants them to do.
If you love God and want to please him, leading a good life seems a small sacrifice to make ...

There is a Christian motto which says: "Hate the sin, but love the sinner"
That's based on Jesus' example to us.

Peace

Christian Woman :)
 
Re: Did you read Holy Quran ? How it is different from ur holy Book ?

Hey glo. :)


This reflects much of the Christian thinking:
Christians do not try to live good lives to earn God's favour - they have already gained it through faith.
Instead they try to live good lives, because they know it is what God wants them to do.


Can you clarify this abit more, because i read in a previous thread from a christian that faith has to have good deeds along with it? Thanks.


If you love God and want to please him, leading a good life seems a small sacrifice to make ...

There is a Christian motto which says: "Hate the sin, but love the sinner"
That's based on Jesus' example to us.


I totally agree with that! :)
 
Re: Did you read Holy Quran ? How it is different from ur holy Book ?

Can you clarify this abit more, because i read in a previous thread from a christian that faith has to have good deeds along with it? Thanks.
Christians believe that we cannot earn salvation by deeds (because we would never be good enough by God's standards). Therefore Christianity teaches that we gain salvation through faith. (I understand that protestants believe we gain salvation through faith alone, whereas catholics believe you need good deeds as well as faith - but I would rather leave it to my catholic friends to explain their own perspective)

Either way, both denominations teach that having gained salvation does not mean that we can behave in any way we like. God still requires good deeds and godly behaviour - and he will judge us accordingly.

Also, if you have really committed your life to God, you should wish to obey him ... so in that sense faith should lead to good deeds ...

Does that make it clearer?

I totally agree with that! :)
I always love to find areas where Islam and Christianity are in agreement! :)

Peace
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top