Refuting the Islamophobe's claim that Prophet Muhammad was a Pedophile.

  • Thread starter Thread starter - Qatada -
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 81
  • Views Views 23K
sweet106 said:
Pedophilia maybe a sickness but that wont stop them going through any means to feed their sickness. Juts imagine, I will marry a 9 years old and say she started puberty, pay their parents and get to abuse her for few years! Oh wasnt it in the U.S where pedophile kinapped a 11 years old girl (according to you is capable of marriage) and abused her for 23 years or so? no doubt he was in fact a pedophile because he did abuse a child and hanged around the park to seek victim? Pedophile will and have used any means to feed their perversion.
Click to expand...

I told you that I don't respond well to emotive appeals. I'd like scientific evidence to what you claim.
I'd also like for you to refrain from attributing erroneous conclusions or statements to me out of refusal to read what I have actually written.
And lastly you seem to have nullified your own claims seeing as said pedophile kidnapped and sexually abused the victim rather than approaching her parents for marriage, having a contract and most importantly her consent!

best,
 
ßlµêßêll said:


poverty, ignorance, and disability are a cause of a great deal of the world's problems including what you'd like to see changed. The problem is time & time again you refuse to seek treatment to the cause opting instead for a cosmetic solution..

“O Lord I seek refuge in Thee from kufr (unbelief) and poverty,”[7] for according to another hadith, “Poverty, in all probability, leads to unbelief (kufr).”

and kufr leads to all else!

:w:
Click to expand...

I do get it, if people were not living in poverty there would high life expectancy and less pressure to marry at an early age and possibly less forced marriage (although this happens in the UK).

Dont change the fact that I dont approve of 9, 10, 11 years getting married.
 
sweet106 said:
I do get it, if people were not living in poverty there would high life expectancy and less pressure to marry at an early age and possibly less forced marriage (although this happens in the UK).

Dont change the fact that I dont approve of 9, 10, 11 years getting married.
Click to expand...
Neither does it change the fact that no one here is advocating the marriage of 9,10, or 100 year olds nor is it an Islamic injunction to do so!

best
 
ßlµêßêll said:


I told you that I don't respond well to emotive appeals. I'd like scientific evidence to what you claim.
I'd also like for you to refrain from attributing erroneous conclusions or statements to me out of refusal to read what I have actually written.
And lastly you seem to have nullified your own claims seeing as said pedophile kidnapped and sexually abused the victim rather than approaching her parents for marriage, having a contract and most importantly her consent!

best,
Click to expand...



If the west were living in society where they had no age limit marriage maybe a study would be possible! Since they don’t, how do you suppose they conduct their study?

I haven’t nullified my own claims, I merely demonstrated the fact some paedophile will go to extra length to feed their sickness! What makes you think they won’t take the advantage of society that approves of no age limit marriage?
I haven’t made conclusion from what you have written: you approve of no age limit means you couldn’t care less if a 9 years get married. After all, how you ensure she had started her puberty and is ready? Hope for the best?
 
sweet106 said:
If the west were living in society where they had no age limit marriage maybe a study would be possible! Since they don’t, how do you suppose they conduct their study?
Click to expand...
I guess the moral of the story is not to make claims you can't back up. According to the DSM pedophiles don't marry the object of their abuse!

I haven’t nullified my own claims, I merely demonstrated the fact some paedophile will go to extra length to feed their sickness! What makes you think they won’t take the advantage of society that approves of no age limit marriage?
Click to expand...
But you have! You alleged that pedophiles will marry their victims citing that one example but failed to show in said example that the pedophile did just that marry that woman!
Perhaps you could cite a better example to elucidate your case?



sweet106 said:
I haven’t made conclusion from what you have written: you approve of no age limit means you couldn’t care less if a 9 years get married. After all, how you ensure she had started her puberty and is ready? Hope for the best?
Click to expand...

Well then I challenge you to quote me as having said that!
 
sweet106 said:
Does that mean I can disapprove of it personally? If so, can the discussion end here?
Click to expand...

You can do whatever you like including work on your definitions.. I am really curious as to how you render your own meaning to what should be otherwise a medical diagnosis .. I do wonder if you can distinguish the difference between Schizophrenia to Schizophreniform Disorder to Schizoaffective Disorder to Schizoid Personality Disorder or Schizotypal Personality Disorder.. or in this case the difference between a pedophile or a child molester etc.

You can't pass off wrong information as facts out of whims, you may certainly hold your opinion but you must accept when your opinion is so obviously proven wrong like your speech about the mentally challenged needing to be assessed for marriage by a professional. Quite frankly who are you to tell others how to live their lives under penalty of law?
 
ßlµêßêll said:

I guess the moral of the story is not to make claims you can't back up. According to the DSM pedophiles don't marry the object of their abuse!


But you have! You alleged that pedophiles will marry their victims citing that one example but failed to show in said example that the pedophile did just that marry that woman!
Perhaps you could cite a better example to elucidate your case?





Well then I challenge you to quote me as having said that!
Click to expand...


Pedophiles don't marry the object of their abuse because they dont the opportunity to do so!

The man kidnapped that girl, I doubt he would be able to marry her freely since he kidnapped her! Again I was demonstrating the length pedophiles will go to! I cant find examples because the law does not allow it.

Fine, you said agree with no age limit. So why would you care if a 9 years old get married? Ill ask you a question, do you think a 9 years old is mature enough to get married?
 
Sis sweet,

I don't mean to sound harsh & ask your forgiveness I think you're a great lady who is opinionated as many women are, I actually see where you're coming from, I don't agree that it will solve the problem however and I don't see the rational behind it holding much weight, religiously or scientifically. As for law enforcement of morality, well a society that breeds laws out of whimsy is one that doesn't hold much weightiness in my book!

Some colonial legislatures even passed "stubborn children laws," giving parents the legal right to kill unruly children. According to journalist Roger Rosenblatt, Massachusetts enacted a law in 1646 that allowed the death penalty for a rebellious child, though the law was never enforced ("The Society That Pretends to Love Children," New York Times Magazine, October 8, 1995).

Read more: Child Abuse—A History - Overview - Children, Parents, Century, and Master http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/1360/Child-Abuse-History-OVERVIEW.html#ixzz1dp9L90fi

so you can see where man made laws are a serious problem.. What seems correct today might not be 100 years from now. Allah swt has already given us Jurisprudence, sound judgment which believe me if followed parents wouldn't be selling off their kids at 8 nor would kids be popping out kids at 12 out of wedlock..

:w:

​
 
ßlµêßêll said:


You can do whatever you like including work on your definitions.. I am really curious as to how you render your own meaning to what should be otherwise a medical diagnosis .. I do wonder if you can distinguish the difference between Schizophrenia to Schizophreniform Disorder to Schizoaffective Disorder to Schizoid Personality Disorder or Schizotypal Personality Disorder.. or in this case the difference between a pedophile or a child molester etc.

You can't pass off wrong information as facts out of whims, you may certainly hold your opinion but you must accept when your opinion is so obviously proven wrong like your speech about the mentally challenged needing to be assessed for marriage by a professional. Quite frankly who are you to tell others how to live their lives under penalty of law?
Click to expand...

I simply dont approve 9, 10, 11 years old getting married even if they started puberty. I admit I was WRONG to say that about mentally challenged people. I never was a person to restrict anyone freedom to marriage. So, I apologise to anyone I offended.
 
Last edited:
ßlµêßêll said:
Sis sweet,

I don't mean to sound harsh & ask your forgiveness I think you're a great lady who is opinionated as many women are, I actually see where you're coming from, I don't agree that it will solve the problem however and I don't see the rational behind it holding much weight, religiously or scientifically. As for law enforcement of morality, well a society that breeds laws out of whimsy is one that doesn't hold much weightiness in my book!

Some colonial legislatures even passed "stubborn children laws," giving parents the legal right to kill unruly children. According to journalist Roger Rosenblatt, Massachusetts enacted a law in 1646 that allowed the death penalty for a rebellious child, though the law was never enforced ("The Society That Pretends to Love Children," New York Times Magazine, October 8, 1995).

Read more: Child Abuse—A History - Overview - Children, Parents, Century, and Master http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/1360/Child-Abuse-History-OVERVIEW.html#ixzz1dp9L90fi

so you can see where man made laws are a serious problem.. What seems correct today might not be 100 years from now. Allah swt has already given us Jurisprudence, sound judgment which believe me if followed parents wouldn't be selling off their kids at 8 nor would kids be popping out kids at 12 out of wedlock..

:w:

​
Click to expand...

JSK
I get it. But when you have people like Karl around in this forum that make deliberate offence comment concerning young girls, it makes you want to completely reject the idea.
 
sweet106 said:
JSK
I get it. But when you have people like Karl around in this forum that make deliberate offence comment concerning young girls, it makes you want to completely reject the idea.
Click to expand...

Allah a3lam but I think the mods determined that Karl wasn't Muslim by checking his IP or something..

:w:
 
sweet106 said:
Yes considering girl under the age of 15 are 88% and five times more likely to die from childbirth and suffer Obstetric Fistulas.
Click to expand...

Salaam,

Then again, women that get married when they're older are likely to have a miscarriage...or something along those lines. Not sure if this is true.


It wouldnt kill anyone to wait for few years. would you like to see a 9 years old marriage?
Click to expand...

Not really. Then again, who am I to judge? I have heard of young models marrying older men and older women marrying younger men. It's really none of my business. However, I would take issue with it a marriage if the women has not reached puberty and is not mentally capable...

Cousin marriage is not vile but is damaging if the same family goes again and again and again to their offspring.
Click to expand...

I know but many western people find it gross. It's just an example to show how people's attitudes have changed.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top