Science has a problem with God?

[Masuma]

@ Brother mad_scientist and brother Missinglinks:

Asalamu alikum Wa rehmatullahi Wa Barakatuh!:statisfie

^^ lol man, you are attacking me while I am trying to support you guys here.

yeah sorry for that, mistake of mine... may Allah forgive me.. I thought mad scientist!

:giggling: Lol!

^^ well we might have created different methods for studyign natural phenomenon, all the observations are analyzed by humans by one the 5 senses, mostly auditory and optic senses. Therefore, to be observable and to be understandable, observational data MUST be available in a form which is detectable by one of those 5 senses.

Do we have any observational data present with us to analyze the biggest reality in nature that God exists? :-\ I don’t know. Maybe it is there. Yeah we can say that existence of God can be proven through His creation. Believers see God’s art in His creation. But do we have the direct methods or proofs, any observational data which is detectable by one of our 5 senses?

It seems that the indirect methods of proving God’s existence are insufficient for the Atheists. So if we Muslims can get them direct proofs, then maybe they’ll believe.:statisfie


And Allah knows best!

 

[Skavau]

I’ve already answered to that before!

Yes. Very badly.

So this tells me about your personality as Allah has mentioned a fact in Holy Quran about people like you.

You claim to know my entire personality based on the fact that I reject and disbelieve in the concept of a hereafter?

It seems that the indirect methods of proving God’s existence are insufficient for the Atheists. So if we Muslims can get them direct proofs, then maybe they’ll believe.

Well, logical fallacies remain - logical fallacies.

 

[Gabriel Ibn Yus]

Yes and no.

I think that the answer would be that we have a problem with science
because we associate to it things which it does not have.

It is like speaking to a wall. It has no real content. Science is like a
machine that provides us answers about physical things or things that
can be measured.

The problem begins when people are confused and start thinking that
this machine can tell them answers about questions it cannot.

For instance - before answering science really big questions we have
to understand that science cannot answer questions which for
us require no proof.

Can science prove that you are alive? No.

Do scientists know why an apple falls of a tree (contrary
to how)? No.

So, why should we put so much attention to this anyway?

I think this whole issue of science vs. religion is a whole big
deception and we should stand against it. Because as far as
I see it science is just a machine which is at best man made.