The “Human Shield” LIE Exposed

Where were they when they got captured? inside Lebanese territories.

The militant group Hezbollah captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes Wednesday across the border in southern Lebanon, prompting a swift reaction from Israel, which sent ground forces into its neighbor to look for them. The forces were trying to keep the soldiers' captors from moving them deeper into Lebanon, Israeli government officials said on condition of anonymity
http://www.forbes.com/technology/feeds/ap/2006/07/12/ap2873051.html


The Lebanese Shiite Hezbollah movement announced on Wednesday that its guerrillas have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. "Implementing our promise to free Arab prisoners in Israeli jails, our strugglers have captured two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon," a statement by Hezbollah said. "The two soldiers have already been moved to a safe place," it added. The Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were captured as they "infiltrated" into the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. [Hindustan Times 7/12/06] http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1742306,00050004.htm

The Lebanese Hezbollah movement announced Wednesday the arrest of two Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon. Lebanese police said that the two soldiers were arrested as they entered the town of Aitaa al-Chaab inside the Lebanese border. Israeli aircraft were active in the air over southern Lebanon, police said, with jets bombing roads leading to the market town of Nabatiyeh, 60 kilometers south of Beirut Bahrain News Agency http://english.bna.bh/?ID=47348

TRANSLATION: According to the Lebanese police force, the two soldiers were captured in Lebanese territory, in the area of Aïta Al-Chaab close to the border, whereas Israeli television indicated that they had been captured in Israeli territory. [fr.news.yahoo 7/12/06] http://fr.news.yahoo.com/12072006/2...deux-soldats-israeliens-sept-autres-tues.html

According to the Lebanese police force, the two Israeli soldiers were captured in Lebanese territory, in the area of Aïta Al-Chaab, near to the border with Israel, where an Israeli unit had penetrated in middle of morning. [AFP 7/12/06]

The militant group Hezbollah said it captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes across the border in southern Lebanon on Wednesday. [chinabroadcast 7/12/06] http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/2947/2006/07/12/[email protected]

In the afternoon, the scene changed in the streets of southern Lebanon, which was the target of 32 Israeli raids that mainly targeted areas near the area where the two soldiers were captured in Aita al Chaab, close to the border with Israel. [news.monstersandcritics.com 7/12/06] http://news.monstersandcritics.com/...ack_in_the_spotlight_after_capturing_soldiers

It all started on July 12 when Israel troops were ambushed on Lebanon's side of the border with Israel. Hezbollah, which commands the Lebanese south, immediately seized on their crossing. They arrested two Israeli soldiers, killed eight Israelis and wounded over 20 in attacks inside Israeli territory. [Asia Times 7/15/06] http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HG15Ak02.html

TRANSLATION: Hezbollah has made it clear time and again that it would retaliate by capturing and detaining Israeli soldiers if they entered Lebanon and use them in an exchange of prisoners. Israel has in a deliberate manner sent a commando into Lebanon (Aïta Al Chaab) They came under attack from Hezbollah, who captured two of their soldiers. [voltairenet.org 7/18/06] http://www.voltairenet.org/article142056.html

Only weeks ago, an entire reserve division was drafted in order to train for an operation such as the one the IDF is planning in response to Wednesday morning's Hizbullah attacks on IDF forces along the northern border. [JPost 7/12/06] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satell...50885978380&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Israel's military response by air, land and sea to what it considered a provocation last week by Hezbollah militants is unfolding according to a plan finalized more than a year ago.

In the years since Israel ended its military occupation of southern Lebanon, it watched warily as Hezbollah built up its military presence in the region. When Hezbollah militants kidnapped two Israeli soldiers last week, the Israeli military was ready to react almost instantly. [SFGate 7/21/06] http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/07/21/MIDEAST.TMP&type=printable

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/169834.php


They never really answered this post ....as the same in other threads....if they were to accept this...then they would have to admit Israel are the aggressors and they are wrong.
They would not accept anything that conflicts with their views.- no matter how much u try.
 
They never really answered this post ....as the same in other threads....if they were to accept this...then they would have to admit Israel are the aggressors and they are wrong.
They would not accept anything that conflicts with their views.- no matter how much u try.

true..they dont seek peace only war and hatred...they will gladly support Israel even if what it does is wrong and in clear breach of humanitarian laws...in their eyes the God's 'chosen' people can never do wrong.

Malcolm X ( May God have mercy on his soul) said to the White american 'patriots' 'You're not to be blinded with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong no matter who does it or says it'

this saying would also apply to the reliigous nationalists who justify all atrocities done by their fellow believers.
 
1. If a criminal takes a hostage, and makes demands on the threath of killing the hostage.
2. And then killls the hostage because demands are not met.
3. The responsability of killing lies in teh criminal, not in the officials who fail to meet his demands.

1. If Israel wants to catch a terrorist group. and makes demands on the treath of killing of civilians.
2. And then kills civilians because hezbollah does not surrender.
3. The responsability of the victems lies at the Israelian army, not at Hezbollah for hiding in the wrong place.
Your analogy is wrong. First off your responsibility is to the public at large not that hostage. If that criminal starts shooting everyone in sight it's is the responsibility of the police to take down that criminal even if the hostage get's killed. That's what Israel is doing.
 
'Oops, Sorry' Doesn't Let Israel Off the Hook By Adam Shatz
Although Israel expressed "regret" for its "mistake," it justified the attack as a response to Hezbollah's firing of two Katyusha rockets and eight mortars from areas near the compound. The architect of Israel's "Operation Grapes of Wrath," Prime Minister Shimon Peres, argued that Hezbollah bore responsibility for the Qana disaster, claiming it cynically used civilians as human shields

Rather than limiting its strikes to key Hezbollah positions and pursuing all available diplomatic channels, as might be expected of a mature regional power with nuclear weapons, Israel launched a vengeful war on Lebanon, which, it has since been reported, was planned over a year in advance. It has displayed a callous disregard for human life, for Lebanon's infrastructure (which only in recent years had begun to recover from Israel's 1982 invasion), for the stability of Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora's fragile government and for the country's natural environment, now facing an ecological catastrophe from an oil spill caused by the bombing. An estimated 750 Lebanese, overwhelmingly civilians and many of them children, have died, a dozen times more than the 50-plus Israelis (more than half of them soldiers) killed by Hezbollah.

Whole article here http://www.latimes.com/news/printed...4712071.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california
 
true..they dont seek peace only war and hatred...they will gladly support Israel even if what it does is wrong and in clear breach of humanitarian laws...in their eyes the God's 'chosen' people can never do wrong.

Malcolm X ( May God have mercy on his soul) said to the White american 'patriots' 'You're not to be blinded with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong no matter who does it or says it'

this saying would also apply to the reliigous nationalists who justify all atrocities done by their fellow believers.
Brother Malcolm Shabazz also learned the error of his ways after he took the Hajj and realized that he can work with the white man. That it was wrong to focus on skin color that he prayed with other muslims that were bolnde hair blue eyed.
 
Brother Malcolm Shabazz also learned the error of his ways after he took the Hajj and realized that he can work with the white man. That it was wrong to focus on skin color that he prayed with other muslims that were bolnde hair blue eyed.

:rollseyes
 
Brother Malcolm Shabazz also learned the error of his ways after he took the Hajj and realized that he can work with the white man. That it was wrong to focus on skin color that he prayed with other muslims that were bolnde hair blue eyed.


this is indeed 'new' information *yawns* and how is he your brother?..he was for peace ..you're a warmonger who justifies aparthied.
 
Your analogy is wrong. First off your responsibility is to the public at large not that hostage. If that criminal starts shooting everyone in sight it's is the responsibility of the police to take down that criminal even if the hostage get's killed. That's what Israel is doing.

Never mind Geronimo! You will not change pighead people! This thread lead nowhere so I'm out of this. I'm tired dealing with narrow-minded people, as if they act like children !
 
SKY news dealt with that video..its analyst said the video is of ANOTHER PLACE not anywhere near the building that got hit heres the website again feel free to contact them www.skynews.com :)

and the list goes on. You are not able to provide me only one serious direct link. NOT ONLY ONE! in the whole thread.
as I said, thin air ........... ppfffffffffffffffft

Can't accept a defeat, right?
 
Never mind Geronimo! You will not change pighead people! This thread lead nowhere so I'm out of this. I'm tired dealing with narrow-minded people, as if they act like children !

Funny , i feel the same about u.
 
ok, let me resume:

I provide serious links about the topic, I even launched the topic, provided some pictures, videos, and yet, you don't believe??? hahaha

Well, the G-CON has a new member. Welcome sameer !
 
Your analogy is wrong. First off your responsibility is to the public at large not that hostage. If that criminal starts shooting everyone in sight it's is the responsibility of the police to take down that criminal even if the hostage get's killed. That's what Israel is doing.

Geronimo, let's presumed that ur analogy is right, is it still justified if the whole hostage to be killed just bcoz some police wants to protect the public? If it is, what will the courts verdict on these if the next of kin decided to sue the police for gross negligence in conducting their duty? Will the police hv any chance of winning if they r proven 2 be negligence? Can that argument be hold in any courts of law?
 
Geronimo, let's presumed that ur analogy is right, is it still justified if the whole hostage to be killed just bcoz some police wants to protect the public? If it is, what will the courts verdict on these if the next of kin decided to sue the police for gross negligence in conducting their duty? Will the police hv any chance of winning if they r proven 2 be negligence? Can that argument be hold in any courts of law?
That he acted according to the law. His job is to serve and protect the public.
 
and the list goes on. You are not able to provide me only one serious direct link. NOT ONLY ONE! in the whole thread.
as I said, thin air ........... ppfffffffffffffffft

Can't accept a defeat, right?

i didnt give a sky link because it was on the tv dummy..you can contact the news channel on their web site and verify what i said.

i gave you loads of links which you choose to ignore because it conflicts with what you want the world to believe..ie propaganda.

the fact is
1) RED CROSS WORKERS SAID THERE WERE NO MILITANTS IN QANA

2) THE SURVIVORS OF QANA SAID THERE WERE NO ROCKETS FIRED FROM THEIR VILLAGE

3) THE LEBANESE DEFENSE MINISTER SAID THERE WER ENO HIZBOLLAH IN QANA.
4) SKY NEWS MILITARY ANAYLST SAID VIDEO WAS EITHER FROM A 'DIFFERENT AREA IN QANA' OR 'ANOTHER PLACE'



In you perverted worldview those villagers and Red Cross workers and Sky news analyst and the Lebanese Defense Minister are all liars ..you choose to ignore the facts..and instead you throw a temper tantrum like a 2 year old.

continue to spread lies and i guarantee the moderators will ban you from this forum...till then enjoy whatever time you have left.

taraa
 
Last edited:
ok, let me resume:

I provide serious links about the topic, I even launched the topic, provided some pictures, videos, and yet, you don't believe??? hahaha

Well, the G-CON has a new member. Welcome sameer !

you provided the former Israeli position on Qana heres the update that i posted EARLIER..

It now appears that the military had no information on rockets launched from the site of the building, or the presence of Hezbollah men at the time.

The Israel Defense Forces had said after the deadly air-strike that many rockets had been launched from Qana. However, it changed its version on Monday.

The site was included in an IAF plan to strike at several buildings in proximity to a previous launching site. Similar strikes were carried out in the past. However, there were no rocket launches from Qana on the day of the strike.

its from HA RETZ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/745185.html

gawd i hate repeating myself..im dealing with dimwits and nothing seems to get into their thick skulls *sigh*
 
so now that the IDF admitted there were no rockets launched from Qana on that fateful day..and this is what the Red cross workers and villagers said
(apparently all liars to you) can you tell us why they attacked that village again?? the place where Jesus did his miracles, the same village that was attacked in 1996?
 
gawd i hate repeating myself..im dealing with dimwits and nothing seems to get into their thick skulls *sigh*

I guess you looked in the mirror, when you said that.

I also welcome you the the G-CON. You will be a worthy member !
 
ok, let me resume:

I provide serious links about the topic, I even launched the topic, provided some pictures, videos, and yet, you don't believe??? hahaha

Well, the G-CON has a new member. Welcome sameer !

i thought u were gone? i dont really know what g-con is...but it dosent really matter, cause as u may have realised...more and more ppl around the world are realising about the propaganda u and ure friends spread. I'm sure u realise u are fighting a losing battle in here and on the battle field, cause there will always be soldiers willing to stand up against oppression.
U say u are tired of dealing with pig headed ppl who act liek childeren..then what made u come back? or why do u stick around? maybe u need a life? or did ure boss send u back to try to spread the propaganda some more? If ure a big man as u claim u are...then be the big man and ride of into the sunset.
 
That he acted according to the law. His job is to serve and protect the public.

the acts according to the law does not warrants endangering the life of the hostage, whatever ur argument might be. again, there is no such things of the ends justified the means in any acts of law. if there is one, indeed the law is seriously flawed...:?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top