Your insults only expose your own insecurity. As for medical knowledge, I have been the one quoting from medical encyclopedias and exposing your blunders and inaccurate statements.I'm not going to argue with someone who is obviously intellectually "challenged" when speaking medically
Who said this?! YOU DID! So because you are unable to refute my words you have to put your words in my mouth and then respond to them? This is nonsense. You have clearly failed to respond to the challenge I provided:but feel it my obligation to correct your "fact" that "average" girls reach puberty by the first day of their ninth birthday.
Ansar Al-'Adl said:Prove that Aisha could not have been post-pubescent when she consummated her marriage with the Prophet Muhammad pbuh. No more off-topic rants will be tolerated; they will be deleted.
I think I will take the words of the medical encyclopedia over yours when it says:In reality, the "average" age of a young girls first menses is between the ages of twelve and fourteen, and not post second grade and mid-Barbies.
Even if that was true (which it isn't), it still doesn't refute my point, because we're talking about Aisha rd, not other girls. Can you prove to me that Aisha did not reach puberty until eighteen? Of course not!Not that early menses cannot happen earlier, I am just using this as an "average" for the purposes described on this message board. And although early menses is one aspect of quantifying the passing into maturity, the consensus amongst properly trained physicians, (and not website wannabe's) is that, physiologically, girls do not complete puberty until the "average" age of eighteen.
The vast majority of western countries do not even meet this limit! In the UK, England and Wales have set the age of consent at sixteen. Here are the US states that have the age of consent at sixteen:Hence, it's in the best interests of societies elders (who do know better) to make the age of eighteen a hallmark of sorts when discussing marriage and sexual readiness for the safety of our youth.
Perhaps the US and UK are not civilized?At least that is the basis for human behavior in civilized societies.
Red-herring. This has nothing to do with the topic.Many girls are engaged before they even leave their mothers womb in some backwards countries so I do not understand your angle.
Go back and read what I said in context. You're very good at revealing how little of my post you understood.If Aisha was engaged to someone else before the prophet, it means nothing.
You seem to see the point in very little, considering how most of your posts in this thread have been pointless.And Ansar, I could certainly spend time acquiring and quoting the facts directly from "medical encyclopedia's" as you have suggested but I do not see the point in that.
Science is not a practice. PERIOD. Please research the definition of science before attempting to pose as an authority on it.This may surprise you, but science is not a practice that is based on "facts", it is based on education, intuition and experience.
Feigning knowledge doesn't work in a debate. Your arguments are fallacious. Refute my points with evidence, don't just say, "Trust me, i know what I'm talking about"!As a board certified physicians assistant, I choose to write based on my own professional knowledge and work history. That is what people pay me for, Sir.
It is foolish to back up claims with medical journals but it isn't foolish to speak without evidence?!I am using "intelligence" Ansar. Only a fool would claim to know everything simply because he saw it in print. Even smart humans are fallible and medical journals are constantly being revised.
Again, this is probably the most obvious strawmen visible. I am not saying it is okay for any man to marry any nine year old girl, I am specifically speaking about Aisha rd. Stick to the topic, if you can.I was just thinking and had to come back. If you want to watch some real science in action, let's do our own little experiment here and post some meaningful "hard data" to ease your concern over my seemingly "lack of".
Since scientific "fact" is generally accepted to be based on a 90 percent consensus, let's subject Aisha and other child brides to the test.
Let's randomly ask a significant number of people on the streets if it's okay for fifty-four year old men to have sexual relations with nine year old prepubescents. Let's ask if most have any doubts that a nine year old is not yet sexually and emotionally mature. If even fifteen percent say "yes" (allowing room for error) I will gladly apologize for my lack of common sense.
No it isn't. They have surveys of people off the street which prove that most people don't even know the names of countries around the world. We don't base oour conclusions on the whims and ignorance of the mases but on specific evidence, historical data.That's better than any data that I could pull out of the most up to date science publications.
For the sake of clarity I was just curious as to which question you felt this thread answered.I am not going to reopen the debate about puberty, let us pretend that it was settled by the last few exchanges. I had two questions, but This thread answered one.
The problem with this kind of argument, and I've seen it many times before, is that we are not discussing about people in general but about the Prophet Muhammad pbuh and Aisha rd, and whether their marriage was acceptable.The second question is, if a very similiar situation were at hand today, with a 54 year old man(not the prophet), and a nine year old girl, would it be ok now?
Also, Islamic marriages are not conducted in privacy but are open to the public. Social standards have a role in what age is considered appropriate for the girl to marry.- Al-Shafi`i in al-Umm reported that he saw countless examples of nine-year old pubescent girls in Yemen. Al-Bayhaqi also narrates it from him in the Sunan al-Kubra as does al-Dhahabi in the Siyar.
- Al-Bayhaqi narrated with his chains in his Sunan al-Kubra no less than three examples of Muslim wives that gave birth at age nine or ten.
- Hisham ibn `Urwa himself (whom the objector claims to know enough to forward the most barefaced judgments on his reliability) married Fatima bint al-Mundhir when she was nine years old (al-Muntazam and Tarikh Baghdad).
- Our liege-lord `Umar married Umm Kulthum the daughter of `Ali and Fatima at a similar age per `Abd al-Razzaq, Ibn `Abd al-Barr and others.
I'm sure we can always re-defined any word so that it would fit any individual but that isn't going to change anything. The fact is that paedophilia is medically recognized as a psychosexual disorder with specific symptoms that the Prophet Muhammad pbuh simply doesn’t fit. He didn’t marry Aisha because of an attraction towards children, on the contrary, as the Islamonline teams notes:
As for the purpose of this marriage, it was purely for sociopolitical reason. The Prophet’s main concern was the future of Islam. He was interested in strengthening the Muslims by all bonds.
You as a non-muslim consider that Aisha was a child. She was nine years old when she came to live with the Prophet. What happened at the age of nine? She had her menses. According to Islamic law she is now considered a young women. And this is the natural dividing line between a child and a women. In the west if you look at the numbers at what age can men and women have consensual sex. In the UK it is 16 for heterosexual and for homosexual it is eighteen. You go to Ireland, it’s seventeen. You go to Germany, it’s sixteen. You go to France, it’s fifteen. Go to Italy, it’s fourteen. Go to Holland, it’s twelve. What in England is considered to be paedophilia in Holland is considered to be consensual sex. So their numbers are not based on any tangible dividing point. These numbers have just evolved or have been modified from cultural practices and norms. These figures were derived from a Newsweek article.
…So on one hand, the argument that she was a child falls because they don’t have an accurate point of deciding who’s a child and who’s not.
So to categories Prophet Muhammad pbuh with a label describing sexual predators with a psychosexual disorder is simply ludicrous. Not only does Prophet Muhammad pbuh not fit the description of paedophilia, but the historical fact that Aisha attained puberty before she moved in with the Prophet saws refutes the charge entirely.
You're using a two-step method of trying to classify the Prophet Muhammad pbuh as immoral. First by adjusting the definition of paedophilia so that it fits him, and then sliding him back to be categorised amongst paedophiles whom we all regard as immoral.
But to answer your question, let us further examine the situation you have proposed. In the situation you mention the only point that is significant is the age of the girl. The age of the man is not as important. I would rather a girl marries a kind and loving man who is several years older than her, than marry an abusive man who is closer to her in age. So the only question that is important here is whether the girl has reached puberty and if she is ready to be married her consent is given.
Regards
I've already refuted this:It seems the good prophet didn't realize what future generations would think about it, then? If he had lived in a modern society he would have been arrested and imprisoned.
Ansar Al-'Adl said:The vast majority of western countries do not even meet this limit! In the UK, England and Wales have set the age of consent at sixteen. Here are the US states that have the age of consent at sixteen:
Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, AlabamaAnd in New Hampshire, females may be married at the age of 13 if they have parental consent.
And countries like Japan, South Korea and Spain have the age at 13, while Mexico and the province of Quebec in Canada have said 12!
And even if we sent the age at 18, there still may be females who are not mature enough at this age. The reality is that the limit varies from individual to individual, and it must be determined according tot he symptoms of puberty.
1. I'm not speaking about anyone, I am speaking about the Prophet Muhammad pbuh and Aisha - I clarified this in my last post.So what you are saying is that having sex with a 9 year old is perfectly okay as long as she has had her first period?
I already have. All medical professionals confirm that in the Arabian climate, girls matured much earlier and it was customary for them to be married off early. Even in the west, many countries used to have the age of consent at nine years or lower.No, it doesn't. You may not like to hear this, but she was still a child and that is a fact that wont change no matter what you claim. You can ask any educated doctor and he will tell you the truth.
This actually quite easily refuted by ACTUAL CASE where a nine year old girl gave birth to a healthy child - see the appendix in this article:A 9 year old girl is by no means ready to give birth to a child, even if she is capable of becoming pregnant. Her body isn't fully developed and neither is her mind.
So the answer is yes? A 9 year old can marry and have sex with someone whos 54? Actually I am pretty shocked at your statements, Ansar Al-'Adl. I haven't discussed these matters with muslims before but now I am really concerned as to what is going on amongst some of you..![]()
How do you know that Prophet Muhammed(saw) had sex with Aisha immediately after they got married? Presumptions like these are lead to false perceptions about a topic as serious as this.
Thank you for your reply. I wasn't saying that he did have sex with her, I haven't seen proof of that. I just think that someone at the age of 9 is too young to have sex...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.