Ibn Abi Ahmed
IB Legend
- Messages
- 7,915
- Reaction score
- 2,837
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Given that, may I ask you (as I have Yusuf above) to reflect on the following:
I think I should have clarified a bit further what I was talking about in my last post. My apologies for not being clearer.
The answer to this is very simple.Praying for another, specifically the forgiveness of that other person's sins, How is that not making intercession? And for these women to ask (i.e. supplicate) Muhammad to make this intercession for them, How is that not doing the very thing that you say is called shirk?O Prophet! When believing women come to thee to take the oath of fealty to thee, that they will not associate in worship any other thing whatever with Allah, that they will not steal, that they will not commit adultery (or fornication), that they will not kill their children, that they will not utter slander, intentionally forging falsehood, and that they will not disobey thee in any just matter,- then do thou [Muhammad] receive their fealty, and pray to Allah for the forgiveness (of their sins): for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
(Surah 60:12)
A distinction needs to be made between the living and the dead. To ask someone who is alive (in our worldly sense, not alive after having passed away) and able to make supplication for you does not fall under the forbidden intercession, because the person is alive, able to hear you and communicate with you. The verse you've quoted for me is speaking about the women coming to give the oath to the Messenger - obviously when he was alive. Thus it is permissible to ask someone alive to pray for you. The problem begins when one starts asking the dead for the fulfillment of his needs.
A renowned Islamic scholar, Ibn al-Qayyim explains in his book called Madarij al-Salikin (1/332):
“From the forms (of Shirk): Requesting the dead for needs, seeking their aid and turning to them.
This is the basis for Shirk in the world. This is because the actions of the dead have ceased. He is not able to harm or benefit himself, let alone the one who seeks his aid, or asks him to fulfil his need, or asks him to intercede for him with Allah, for this is from his ignorance with respect to the intercessor and the one interceded for, as has preceded. This is because he (the intercessor) is not able to intercede for him with Allah, except with His permission. Allah did not make his ‘seeking aid’ and petitioning, a cause for Allah’s permission to be granted. The only cause that grants Allah’s permission (for intercession) is the perfection of Tawheed. Yet, this polytheist comes along, with a cause that only prevents Allah’s permission (for intercession)!”
This is the basis for Shirk in the world. This is because the actions of the dead have ceased. He is not able to harm or benefit himself, let alone the one who seeks his aid, or asks him to fulfil his need, or asks him to intercede for him with Allah, for this is from his ignorance with respect to the intercessor and the one interceded for, as has preceded. This is because he (the intercessor) is not able to intercede for him with Allah, except with His permission. Allah did not make his ‘seeking aid’ and petitioning, a cause for Allah’s permission to be granted. The only cause that grants Allah’s permission (for intercession) is the perfection of Tawheed. Yet, this polytheist comes along, with a cause that only prevents Allah’s permission (for intercession)!”
The understanding of 'essence' here is that, it is the core of worship. No Islamic form of worship exists, except that it involves supplication to God - which is why if misplaced to someone other than God falls under shirk.Mind you, personally, I don't think there is anything wrong with the practice as outlined in the Qur'an, but you have said that to make supplication (i.e. ask) of another -- exactly what these women are doing -- is the very essence of worship. Maybe it really isn't the very essence of worship after all? Maybe all it is is simply asking for assistance? That, too, I would suggest could be overdone, and perhaps there is too much attention given to that in Catholicism, after all God does not need us to use intermediaries; he can and does comes to us in his own right, and bids us likewise to approach him. But that would be a different issue, not the one under present discussion.
I mean, you can come out and say that 'asking' a person for a favor falls under 'supplication', which might actually be correct linguistically, but the understanding here in terms of Islamic theology, would be incorrect. The distinction I made above applies here as well.
That was stated in general, not specific to Christians, though I think we do differ on our understanding of 'One God'. You say God's nature is divided into three, while we reply to this saying 3 is more than one regardless. I think this has been discussed many times over on the forum so it might be a bit off topic here.BTW, Christians do NOT claim that He is more than one. We boldly assert there is only one God, be it for Jews, Gentile, Christian, Muslim, or any other person on the face of the earth or any other life form scattered across the breadth of the entire cosmos.
Last edited: