Scimitar
DAWAH DIGITAL
- Messages
- 7,549
- Reaction score
- 851
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
It is sad to see that whole Islamic discussion of "love and marriage" ignores the impact neurons, physiology, genes and hormones play in this process. We do not ignore these physical things when we study disease, but why do we ignore these things when we talk about love and marriage. There are biologically determined and biologically driven desires, with plethora of other enviornmental factors acting on them, which determine which woman falls for a man and what she looks for in him and what he says that'd turn her off and all the 'mind games/tests" he'd have to pass before they can be intimate and vice versa. And all of this does not follow any "logic." It's the way it is.
Discussion of "love" and "marriage" without reference to some biological and psychological principles is futile.
I see what you are trying to say, and yes, there are other factors that we don't take into consideration (as you mentioned above) but to say that discussing love and marriage without some biological and psychological principles is futile, is a bit strong...
...If I may? in the same way I can say that the media affects our view of love, relationships and marriage so we must consider how much the media affects us in the subject of trust, relationships, love and marriage - and therefore, discussing these subjects without factoring in the media, is futile... ??? No. It isn't. And I say this because, when we approach a topic for discussion, there has to be a starting point, a basis for discussion. Debates / discussions start from the most basic understanding of the most common factors that affect the topic, and then we gradually move on to explore other possibilities which relate back to the core of the topic as another "branch to the tree" which is the main topic. In this way, we can factor in other less considered elements/influences, such as the impact which neurons, physiology, genes and hormones play in this process. But if we happen to miss that avenue of discussion, it doesn't make the discussion futile bro CP

Scimi.