Re: Can a Muslim still like Dogs I know Muslims are not allowed to keep Dogs as pets
Yes, I am aware of such ahadeeth, but please tell me which part it says that Rasulullah "hated" dogs? You said "apparently prophet Muhammad hate dogs".
Also, as far as I am aware, the killing of dogs apply to rabid dogs only, and we know that today rabid dogs carry rabies.
Here's good explanation on such hadiths that deal with dogs:
Brother, do you really think Rasulullah SAW was wrong when he issued injunctions concerning dogs?
i don't think the messenger of God (may peace be upon him) was wrong, and i didn't say he was, all i said was that he hated them, which is i will make it clear - my own opinion - judging form from the hadith that he ordered them to be killed after he found that angels don't enter the house with dogs, if he liked them, he would have just made sure none came into his house, and regarding your comment on rabid dogs, it was also the dogs kept for the orchards, which i assume would not be rabid, but just because the Messenger (pbuh) personally disliked garlic, he told us to continue to eat it if we pleased, that was different, but the fact that angels don't enter a house with dogs does imply that there is something impure about them, don't get me wrong, i like certain dogs myself, but won't let them try to lick me, i even stroke them, i used to grab my cousin's rottweiler by the throat, throw it on the floor and let it gnaw away at my hand when playing with it, now i wouldn't.
and i know that some dogs are very loyal to their owner as was the dog from surah kahf. but there are many things which were allowed before -prophet yusuf's parents prostrated themselves to him - that doesn't in any way mean that muslims are allowed to prostrate to any human being. Prophet Sulaiman had images of lions etc built as display ornaments, there could have been an exception as moses (pbuh) forbade it, so did the Prophet Muhammad.
also despite the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) making such an order - he did say that a ***** woman from the Children of Israel was forgiven for feeding water to a thirsty dog - from the description, it would be easy to assume that it was a rabid dog and not a domestic one, here he is showing the benefits of a kind heart and a considerate person, but it didn't mean he would allow them to prevent the revelation of God come to the people by defiling the visiting place.
quite a complicated issue - one would have to take the time to think, yet it would be good for us to be able to present relevant information which contributes to the topic without attacking each other.
but thanks to your pointed question - i will yield and admit that it is my own opinion taken from the texts,
any good is from Almighty God's guidance
any evil is from the misguidance of Satan,
peace