Variant Korans-

  • Thread starter Thread starter hawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 83
  • Views Views 23K
hey I am a Muslim and not hawk.Hawk is a Catholic.I just wanna know,so that I can be reassured and can use this information to debate and prove people in other sites that the Quran was preserved.

Those are some of the final questions I am asking about the preservation of the Quran. Please take your time.

I am Abrarur from understanding Islam forums.

BTW, it is Hawk who caused to raise such questions inside my mind.
 
:sl: Ok brother cool, sorry for the mistake inshallah you can forgive me. As for your question I have an answer to it but no access to it at the minute, inshallah I will try and get it for you may take a few weeks though.

:w:
 
Its ok brother.
few weeks!ok I hope it contains all the details and clears what doubt has risedn inside my mind.Mind these are little doubts.Is the answer big.I hope its big and contains all the details how the Quran was passed down perfectly through the ages.

BTW, what happened in Yemen in that article in page 1?
 
:sl:

I am assuming that the answer which Khattab will provide will be addressing the issue of the preservation of the Qur'an, is this correct?

Regarding the second question of Abdul Aziz; for the time being, I shall direct you to relevant parts of the article posted by Ansar Al-'Adl Insha'Allaah.

Can someone explain me shortly whatever the hell happened in Yemen?Were the Qurans that were found there totaly different from our Qurans of today's?
Orientalists plot against the Qur'an under the guise of academic study and archive preservation

To the excitement of Puin and von Bothner, some showed minor differences in wording and verse-order from Qur'ans in use today.


The fact is that the existence of minor differences in wording and in the ordering of the surahs in the earliest masahif (manuscripts) is no surprise to Muslims familiar with classical Islamic scholarship of the Qur'an. Such variations occurred for several reasons. One factor is the dialectical differences then existing in different regions of Arabia. Another is that some of the Sahaba kiram (Companions) recorded such masahif for their own personal use. As these persons had either memorised the Qur'an in its entirety or large portions of it, such masahif were written merely as an aid to memory. Therefore, notes in the margins such as the wording of du'as (supplications) occurred, and the order of surahs varied. Books written by classical Muslim scholars, such as al-Suyuti's Itqan, go into great detail about such issues.


When the Khalifa 'Uthman ibn 'Affan ordered that one standard text be used and others destroyed, the Sahaba who possessed masahif containing variants did not object to this ruling, which shows that they agreed with his verdict. Moreover, in the subsequent civil war between the supporters of the Khalifa Ali ibn Abi-Talib and Mu'awiya, calls for arbitration according to the Qur'an never involved claims that the other side had an incomplete or changed Qur'an. This would have been a convenient and devastating weapon if it could have been at all convincing. Knowledge about these variations has been preserved by classical Muslim scholarship, and has been useful to scholars of tafsir (Qur'anic interpretation). It was never seen as evidence against the integrity of the Qur'anic text, however, and for this reason Orientalists have not succeeded in building a compelling argument upon it. Having their own documents to build speculations upon gives them much more room to manoeuvre, as they can define the terms and conditions of their research.


Western study of the Qur'an and of Islam originated in missionary and military concerns. Modern 'specialists' in Islam have tried to distance themselves from this heritage and project their conclusions as secular, scientific and unbiased. However, the article reveals a persistent Biblical as well as secular bias These specialists seem blissfully unaware that Biblical criticism and their version of Qur'anic studies did not "fall out of the sky" either. These approaches to scripture are products of a particular historical, political and economic climate.


The Bible is the implicit model against which the Qur'an is measured. It is considered a "cocktail" because it does not present material in the chronological or thematic order typical of Biblical narratives. Secular biases in both Biblical and Qur'anic studies are revealed in hostility to divine revelation in any form: any text dealing with miraculous occurrences is deemed inauthentic. Also, the Biblical form of any narrative is considered to be the most authentic, because it is older, while the idea that the Qur'an, as the latest revelation, could be correct in its different accounts of events is dismissed. The limitations of the purveyors of this 'unbiased' and 'scientific' study of the Qur'an are arrogantly imposed on the sacred text itself. Puin claims that one-fifth of the Qur'an is incomprehensible, apparently because he himself cannot understand it. Fourteen hundred years of Muslim scholarship, devotion and art issuing forth from the Qur'an are seen as carrying less weight than the opinions of a handful of non-Muslims who cannot even claim native fluency in classical Arabic.


Muslimedia: May 16-31, 1999

Hope that helps Insha'Allaah.
:w:
 
:sl:

How can Hawk say its fanciful imagination that the Quran has been completely memorised, I gather that you have never seen a Hafid read then and not to mention six year olds not hesitating on a single word. You maybe are used to the Bible and have got it in your mind that its impossible but be reassured the Quran is very different from the Bible
 
thanks brothers.Look I don't doubt about the preservationof the Quran.Forgive me and May Allah do the same if I had said that.I am asking how it was preserved.Since if I ever face a question like this by a non-Muslim.
 
are there still ancient manuscripts in Middle East?Are there any copies of the Quran during Uthman's time?
 
Re: Alleged Contradictions in the Qur'an


Who was Al-Hajjaj and what changes did he make to the Quran?Did he changed the meaning or just the pronounciation?

and please post on the abrogations thread in basics of Islam forum.........
 
:sl:
That's what the report would indicate but the report isn't reliable. I prefer Al-Azami's explanation that Al-Hajjaj took the Uthmanic manuscript, compared it to manuscripts circulating in the area, and changed the latter group of manuscripts to conform with the Uthmanic manuscript.

:w:
 
a last question for the time being hehe.Did Umar the second caliph insert the verse of stoning in all the Qurans?
 
is it the chronological order of the preservation of the Quranic text like this?

1.Abu Bakr compiled the Quran(Did some of these Qurans contain the stoning verse?)
2.Umar then inserted the stoning verse
3.Uthman then destroyed the Qurans containing the stoning verse and kept a single standard copy.

please correct me if there are mistakes which is most likely and also plz elaborate on each of the points if you want to.Thanks.

EDIT~If not for the stoning verse why did Uhtman burn all those Qurans?
 
Last edited:
:sl:
Abdul Aziz said:
1.Abu Bakr compiled the Quran(Did some of these Qurans contain the stoning verse?)
No they did not contain the stoning verse. I told you its recitation was abrogated.
2.Umar then inserted the stoning verse
No he did not! I said that its recitation was abrogated.
3.Uthman then destroyed the Qurans containing the stoning verse and kept a single standard copy.
No! Uthman prepared a few copies of the Qur'an that were perfect under the supervision of all companions. He then ordered unauthorised copies burned, so that all future copies would be made from these 100% perfectly authentic copies.

This is a brief explanation.
Please read here for more info:
http://drzakirnaik.com/pages/qanda/22.php
http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/Text/Qiraat/hafs.html


:w:
 
Abdul Aziz said:
a last question for the time being hehe.Did Umar the second caliph insert the verse of stoning in all the Qurans?
:sl:

Excerpt from:
Is the Verse on Stoning FAKE?
...Umar رضی الله عنه did not tell the wording of that Ayaah آيه about stoning, nor did he tell that if there is a separate Ayaah آيه beside the Ayaah آيه in Surah Noor سورة النور and why it is not included in the Glorious Qur’aan. He only said that if there was no risk involved that people would put a blame on him of making addition in the Book of Allaah, he would have written this verse on a corner of the Qur’aan (al-Nasai’). Another point to be noted that Umar رضی الله عنه did not say that he would have included this verse in the Qur’aan. But before one jumps the gun, he must know that Islaamic Shariah rule about Naskh نسخ includes: Naskh نسخ of recitation and not the commandment. There are also very few Ayaat آيات is Glorious Qur’aan which are recited but command have been abrogated.

:w:
Preacher
 
Abdul Aziz said:
is it the chronological order of the preservation of the Quranic text like this?

1.Abu Bakr compiled the Quran(Did some of these Qurans contain the stoning verse?)
2.Umar then inserted the stoning verse
3.Uthman then destroyed the Qurans containing the stoning verse and kept a single standard copy.

please correct me if there are mistakes which is most likely and also plz elaborate on each of the points if you want to.Thanks.

EDIT~If not for the stoning verse why did Uhtman burn all those Qurans?
:sl:

Did you read the Qur'an what it says, and how would you explain the following Ayat?

The Arrangement of Glorious Qur’aan
إِنَّ عَلَيْنَا جَمْعَهُ وَقُرْآنَهُ
'INNA cALAY -NAA JAMc -HU WA- QUR'AAN -HU

It is for Us to collect it and to give you (O Muhammad SAW) the ability to recite it (the Qur'an), [Glorious Quraan 75:17]

The word *JAMAc* in the above verse implies both collection and arrangement, which is a process quite different from the revelation. It is not true that the verses and chapters of Glorious Qur’aan were arranged after the death of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) by someone else, or that they were arranged in the order of their lengths; the longest coming first and shortest last. It is also wrong to say that within the chapters the passages are joined together without any regard to either chronology of revelation or similarity of subject, and that most heterogeneous materials are put together without any regard to logical sequence.

The whole Glorious Qur’aan, complete in every aspect, was available in the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) [Katani 2:384]. The Companions of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) say, ‘We used to write down the Glorious Qur’aan in the time of the Rasool Allaah (SAW)' [Hakim: Al-Mustadrik, 2:611]. The arrangement of chapters and verses in the copies of the Glorious Qur’aan at present in our hands does not follow the chronological order of revelation and their arrangement is TAUQIF i.e. affected by the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) under the GUIDANCE of Divine revelation (Qur’aan 75:17-18].

'INNA cALAY -NAA JAMc -HU WA- QUR'AAN -HU...FA- 'IDHAA QARA'NAA -HU FA- ITTABIc QUR'AAN -HU

It is for Us to collect it and to give you (O Muhammad SAW) the ability to recite it (the Qur'an),...And when We have recited it to you [O Muhammad SAW through Jibrael (Gabriel)], then follow you its (the Qur'an's) recital. [Glorious Qur’aan 75:17-18]

It is also said in the Glorious Qur’aan:

WA- QAALA 'ALLADHENA KAFARO LAW-LAA NUZZILA cALAY -HI AL- QUR'AAN JUMLAH WAAH.IDAH KA- DHAALIKA LI- NUTHABBIT BI- -HI FU'AAD -KA WA- RATTALNAA -HU TARTEL(AN)

And those who disbelieve say: "Why is not the Qur'an revealed to him all at once?" Thus (it is sent down in parts), that We may strengthen your heart thereby. And We have revealed it to you gradually, in stages. (It was revealed to the Prophet SAW in 23 years.).

The concise phrase "RATTALNAA -HU TARTEL(AN)" in the above verse comprises the parallel concept of putting the component parts of a thing together and arranging them as well, as well as endowing it with inner consistency. The word "TARTIL" refers to the measured diction and the thoughtful manner in which it ought to be enunciated. Thus, from the very first, it was meant that the verses and the chapters of the Glorious Qur’aan should be arranged in an order different from that of their revelation, otherwise the revelation and the collection and arrangement would not have been described as two different things.

There was an arrangement followed by the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and we know that many Companions of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) committed the Glorious Qur’aan to memory and could recite it in the recognized orders as followed by the Prophet (SAW). This shows that there was a connection of its verses and chapters, and there was a recognized division of the Book and a fixed form and sequence. The chapters were distinctly marked out and their number was determined. Without a known order and sequence of verses, the Glorious Qur’aan could not have been committed to the memory.

(1) Putting into Writing:

The first and the most important point, which assisted in the preservation of the text of Glorious Qur’aan, is that its every verse was put into writing in the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), BEFORE HIS OWN EYES. The Glorious Qur’aan itself furnishes abundant evidence that it existed in a written form. Again and again the Divine Writ calls itself a Kitab (Book), which means a Book or writing, which is complete in itself. The application of the word Book to the Glorious Qur’aan was destined, from the very beginning, to be a complete Book. The Glorious Qur’aan is also designated as "Suhuf"

The Glorious Qur’aan, Sura: 80. 'Abasa Verse: 13
فِي صُحُفٍ مُكَرَّمَةٍ
(It is) in Records held (greatly) in honour (Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz),

* Also means written pages. There are many other references in the Glorious Quraan showing that it will exist in a written form. It is said:

The Glorious Qur’aan, Sura: 52. Tuur Verses: 2-3

وَكِتَابٍ مَسْطُورٍ
And by a Book Inscribed

فِي رَقٍّ مَنْشُورٍ
In parchment unrolled.

* There are also testimonies of the enemies of the Qur’aan that Qur’aan was reduced to writing such as:

The Glorious Qur’aan, Sura: 25. Furqaan Verse: 5

وَقَالُوا أَسَاطِيرُ الْأَوَّلِينَ اكْتَتَبَهَا فَهِيَ تُمْلَى عَلَيْهِ بُكْرَةً وَأَصِيلًا
And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has written down: and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon."

* There is a lot of historical evidence concerning the documentation of the Glorious Qur’aan. There are numerous anecdotes showing that when the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) received a revelation it was immediately put into writing. The general practice is described by Osmaan (RA), he says: "It was customary with the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) that when any verse of the Glorious Qur’aan was revealed he called one of those persons who used to write Glorious Qur’aan and said, "Write these verses in the chapter where such and such verse occur".' [Abu Dawud 2:123]. Zaid bin Thabit (RA) who was a scribe of the Prophet (SAW) and was especially appointed for writing down the revelation said, 'whenever a revelation descended the Prophet (SAW) called me and I went to him holding my pen and paper. He dictated to me first and then heard it from me and in case something was left, or some mistake was found, it was set right there and then, and afterwards it was published' {Mujam al_Zawaid}. This shows that the Glorious Qur’aan was presented to the public after it was duly written down.

Glorious Qur’aan Verses 80:13-16
فِي صُحُفٍ مُكَرَّمَةٍ (13) مَرْفُوعَةٍ مُطَهَّرَةٍ (14) بِأَيْدِي سَفَرَةٍ (15) كِرَامٍ بَرَرَةٍ (16)

(It is) in Records held (greatly) in honour (Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz), Exalted (in dignity), purified, In the hands of scribes. Honourable and obedient.

* (2) Memorizing of the Glorious Qur’aan

The memorizing of the Glorious Qur’aan has also assisted in the preservation of its text. Whenever any portion of the Glorious Qur’aan was revealed to the Prophet (SAW), he committed it to memory and continuously recited it from one end to the other. Thus, he always carried the whole of the revealed Qur’aan in his memory. The Prophet (SAW) used to stress the merit of committing the Glorious Qur’aan to memory so much that he said that if a person committed the Qur’aan to memory he would be saved from the torment of Hell. When he made this announcement, a large number of his Companions began to commit the Glorious Qur’aan to memory. The Prophet (SAW) also took pains to supervise the recitation of the Glorious Qur’aan and was anxious to see that no errors crept into the process.


One should also know the definition of the Qur'an, wihtout that one will remain in the dark always.
Abdul Aziz said:
EDIT~If not for the stoning verse why did Uhtman burn all those Qurans?
Abdul Aziz, the irony of your questions is always that you sound exactly like an inquisitor Christian missionary while mimicking same false claims/questions. I have learned that you are from Bangla Desh, I wonder if there is anyone in your country who can edcuate you about Qur'anic sciences and Islamic sciences? It is pity to see you wonderning all over Internet for so-called answers. As a parent myself, I also wonder why your parent did not teach you about Islam and Qur'an? Nevertheless, I like you to present the evidence that Uhtman burned all Qur'ans allegedly? I suppose you have the supporting facts to establish this claim you have made?

I wish I could believe that you are simply seeking the answer instead of being an inquisitor attempting to create doubts in the minds of naive. Because countless leanred people have answered these questions and have reufted these false claims many times on the Internet. This also include the UI website whose forum you wanted me to join. So why thoese responses and facts are not acceptable to you and you still feel the need to mimick Christians claims based on disinformation?

:w:
Preacher
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top