So what do we do?---sit around and blame each other?
Well, we're doing that already. Doesn't seem like it's working very well.
---spend our time apologiszing for every other thing?
I still think that some time spent doing this has merit. But you're absolutely right if you're saying that one can't spend all of one's time doing this. There are more productive things that we can do.
In my opinion, we need to ask---what can I/we do to help?. We are all brothers and sisters in humanity and if we help each other---we can make this world better. Instead of the cycle of blaming and apologising---we should come up with creative solutions to our World problems---because these problems are all similar all over the world.
And I have said this before and been shot down for it on these very forums. I was told that the efforts of one person are meaningless in a global environment. So, I'm glad to hear your reaffirming voice.
One of the things that I think we can do is to hold those who represent us (or claim to) accountable. Citizens should be writing letters to their governments protesting the actions of those governments when they don't behave in appropriate ways and pursue agendas we disagree with. And when given the opportunity we should be voting for other candidates than those who have led to some of the injustices of the past. If there are none, where practical, we should consider running for office ourselves.
With regard to ideologies that spring up on their own, we need to join groups that promote those things that we can support and resist those that don't. Again, we should not be silent, but need to make our voices heard.
To that end I do applaud that the Fiqh Council of North America issued a statement "to reaffirm Islam's absolute condemnation of terrorism and religious extremism" following the attempted bombing of a Christmas tree lighting celebration in Corvallis, OR. CAIR reported it as
"A Fatwa Against Terrorism." That's not an apology, because they did nothing wrong. Rather it is to assert what Islam truly stands for in contrast to those who might pervert it.
Sadly, there were those in Corvallis who still decided to resort to terror; this time it was directed at Muslims and a Mosque was firebombed. But I also applaud the non-Muslim community in Corvallis who, on learning of the firebombing, organized a "Not In Our Town" response to that sort of hate with a
candlelight vigil in which "more than 300 people stood in a driving rain ... to show support for the Muslim community in the wake of a firebombing that destroyed an office at the Corvallis mosque and shook a city proud of its diversity."
That's just one community. But if that pattern was repeated around the world, it would seem to me to be a model that would truly lead to peace. Not that there wouldn't ever been any incidents, but that they would be come the exception rather than the rule and option of first resort that they seem to be to so many.
.....and maybe we should start by cultivating an attitude of mutual respect......?
No doubt. We could even begin to practice those behaviors on this very forum.
But again, not everyone is going to offer the mutual respect you suggest. So, how should the rest of us respond when we run into statements like: "The day [name omitted] writes anything of tangible substance hell will freeze over and all the devils will be ice skating."? Especially when the person so slandered has not even yet posted in the thread in which s/he has been vilified, and those who made such statements dropped in only to make unkind remarks and they themselves did not contribute anything of substance to the thread?
If we can't practice offering mutual respect on a forum that has as one of its rules "Thou shalt not be rude" and where we are told that "being kind to anyone and everyone is obligatory to every Muslim," how shall we cultivate this mutual respect in the world at large?