Well I didnt read all the previous posts, but my reply to this question would be,
Simple, because they are not muslims.
Maybe you should read the rest of the posts then...
Well I didnt read all the previous posts, but my reply to this question would be,
Simple, because they are not muslims.
Once when my mum was wearing hijaab a non muslim lady said to her "It's ok dear you're in England you don't have to wear that now you can take it off nothing will happen you're safe here" my mum just burst out laughing ;D
wow LOL that had to be super AKWARDOnce when my mum was wearing hijaab a non muslim lady said to her "It's ok dear you're in England you don't have to wear that now you can take it off nothing will happen you're safe here" my mum just burst out laughing ;D
I heard that "some" Christian women wear hijab when they go to church, I wonder why they are following "Bible teaching" only inside the church and then take it off when they leave the church.
Now are they considered to be oppressed inside church because they follow their bible teaching?? :?
1 Corinthians, chapter 11
3Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. 6If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. 7A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.
11In the Lord, however, woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.
1 Corinthians 11 definitely includes public worship, but it does not say that this is the only place it [covering the head] is to be practiced. We are commanded in Scripture to pray without ceasing, not just pray in church. The early church practiced the use of the headcovering throughout the week, not just on Sunday. The Christian woman is to have her head covered anytime she approaches God, at home or in public worship. The man is to have his head uncovered when he prays at home or in public.
I think that many nuns ARE oppressed.
Salaam
STOP THE PRESS!
An atheist says nuns are oppressed
In other news
Pope admits: Yes I may be a Catholic . . .
Bear admits: Ok I may of defecated in the woods . . .
lol, well yes, it should be obvious. Yet the question assumes nuns are not oppressed, as if it is fact.
We are officially in the season of Bikini Christianity, and Muslims are targeted for not dressing sexually like the followers of Paul, and the Western society.
the nudist being thought of as sexualized by the muslims
Huh???
Are you suggesting that Paul taught his followers to dress sexually?????
And who made it "official"? You?
I don't think you really believe that and are just trying to be funny. But from what airforce wrote, I'm wondering if he might actually believe that Paul taught his followers to dress sexually?Maybe it's because Paul abrogated all old laws that jesus observed including dressing.
I don't think you really believe that and are just trying to be funny.
hmmm...Who are these Christians? I've read all sorts of different theological positions presented as Christian on this board, but I don't recall ever reading a post in which the Paul is interpreted to mean that we should be dressed more sexually than the Old Covenant, even if that covenant were to be abrogated.It's the answer that I frequently get from discussing with christians.
Whenever asked why are current christians not doing/observing the things which jesus pbuh did, they regularly explain that is because Paul interpretation is that Jesus abrogated the old covenant, although jesus pbuh himself said that he did not come t abolish the laws and the prophets.
since christians do not have to observe the old covenant, each successive generations of christians then created their own standards of what is ethical and moral, disregarding their own scriptures and completely casting aside everything that jesus did and taught.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.