1)
I am not Catholic, but perhaps I can use them as an example. They possess a great deal of doctrinal minutiae and tradition regarding almost every conceivable doctrine. The nature of the spirit; when the spirit enters the body, the nature of man’s fall, etc, etc, etc. These are all described in detail in a multitude of manuals that new converts may read and study and answer a multitude of questions.
When I ask a question on the Catholic forums I get a clear and concise statement (generally) with data and scriptures as to why they believe what they believe. I can ask the question : Is this “official” and they can generally affirm this though they may give me their opinion which is slightly altered from “officialdom”.
I am not saying they are correct in their doctrines (as I said I am NOT catholic and do not particularly believe in Catholocism), but they HAVE doctrines and they are fairly clear. I have not had this degree of problem getting clears statements from religionists in other forums. It is a new experience for me and I attribute it to less doctrinal definition, less structure and perhaps less doctrinal organization. I do not, in reality, know why I had such problems getting clear doctrine here. Perhaps it was me.
2)
And yet there are many competing Islams who label the others as having incorrect interpretations. I am not saying this to be mean. The same situation exists in Judaism and in Christianity. It is simply the nature of imperfect people to have imperfect unity of doctrines. I have Christian friends who compulsively insist that their interpretation of the Scriptures are the correct ones (for a multitude of reasons) and they simply cannot see that others have different opinions yet are trying to be as honest as anyone else.
PurestAmbrosia. I am appreciative of all that you have tried to teach me but I do not think this forum is for me. I never mean to offend and yet that seems to be all I’ve done since I started posting. I feel I should leave the forum and try to find what I am seeking elsewhere. I truly am sorry if I offended anyone. And grenville, sorry to have changed the fairly calm nature of your thread.
Clear
Perhaps you can elaborate on how we are less structured and organized? in which ways do Muslims differ from Christianity and Judaism (organization wise)
I am not Catholic, but perhaps I can use them as an example. They possess a great deal of doctrinal minutiae and tradition regarding almost every conceivable doctrine. The nature of the spirit; when the spirit enters the body, the nature of man’s fall, etc, etc, etc. These are all described in detail in a multitude of manuals that new converts may read and study and answer a multitude of questions.
When I ask a question on the Catholic forums I get a clear and concise statement (generally) with data and scriptures as to why they believe what they believe. I can ask the question : Is this “official” and they can generally affirm this though they may give me their opinion which is slightly altered from “officialdom”.
I am not saying they are correct in their doctrines (as I said I am NOT catholic and do not particularly believe in Catholocism), but they HAVE doctrines and they are fairly clear. I have not had this degree of problem getting clears statements from religionists in other forums. It is a new experience for me and I attribute it to less doctrinal definition, less structure and perhaps less doctrinal organization. I do not, in reality, know why I had such problems getting clear doctrine here. Perhaps it was me.
2)
There is only one way to interpret and that is from the Quran and the Sunna of prophet Mohammed PBUH... there is no other man with such an authority ( we seek council on difficult matters from scholars) but they are people who have received religious education-- and cannot interpret out of whim... They have to follow the Guidance of the Quran and the Sunna of the prophet PBUH when passing a ruling!.....
And yet there are many competing Islams who label the others as having incorrect interpretations. I am not saying this to be mean. The same situation exists in Judaism and in Christianity. It is simply the nature of imperfect people to have imperfect unity of doctrines. I have Christian friends who compulsively insist that their interpretation of the Scriptures are the correct ones (for a multitude of reasons) and they simply cannot see that others have different opinions yet are trying to be as honest as anyone else.
PurestAmbrosia. I am appreciative of all that you have tried to teach me but I do not think this forum is for me. I never mean to offend and yet that seems to be all I’ve done since I started posting. I feel I should leave the forum and try to find what I am seeking elsewhere. I truly am sorry if I offended anyone. And grenville, sorry to have changed the fairly calm nature of your thread.
Clear