Mustafa2012
Elite Member
- Messages
- 374
- Reaction score
- 39
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Wow. I'm a "troll broad", a "tom dick and herbert schmuck face" and what else? Vitriol is very easily produced here it seems. What I've heard so far is defensive, angry and hateful retorts to my posts. And a great deal about how everyone picks on the Muslims, how "unfair" and onesided it all is. It is exactly what I hear from other groups that have the same martyr attitudes. Now, it may be that Muslims are and have been mistreated. I don't know. As someone here has said, "we" are not historians. Well, neither am I. I've heard repeatedly here and other places about the terrible Crusaders and their violence and murders and on and on. Things that happened so long ago seem to be very much a presence in some people's thinking. And the blurring of edges between Christians and military actions by the US and other countries is also becoming clear. It is almost as if the US and other countries military is made up of Christians, which I can assure you in the case of the US, at least, is most definitely NOT true.
I don't know exactly what produced such vitriolic reactions to my posts but one thing is also becoming clear and that is that I'm not getting answers to the questions but mainly rebukes, sometimes worded in very rude, hateful ways, sometimes in cautionary ways. I've heard a Muslim speaker say that there is no freedom of speech in Islam. Though I think it was intended to say there is not freedom to speak against Mohammed or the god of Islam, it does seem to be part of the thinking on this forum. I don't intend to stop posting, so fire away, you brave mud slingers. Just btw, I have gone to some of the sites mentioned to me. And read from them. (Just so you know, Scimitar.)
Our responses are defensive because this post of yours was the second thread you started where you asked questions in a very assumptive and disrespectful way, without first checking from sources that are easily as available to you as this forum.
The previous thread "Why the violence" that you started is the one that upset many people because of how wrongly it was phrased.
Now, as you've found out, your assumptions are totally wrong apart from some exceptions which we don't consider to be the status quo or the norm.
Re: this statement of yours...
It is almost as if the US and other countries military is made up of Christians, which I can assure you in the case of the US, at least, is most definitely NOT true.
Why do you find it so difficult to hear us refer to the U.S and U.K. as majority Christian countries who perpetrated acts of mass genocide in Iraq and Afghanistan and are standing by watching Israel occupy and murder Palestinians for so many years.
Maybe you fail to remember Bush referring to the war on Iraq as a Christian Crusade. Since he was the one who brought religion into the war we are simply pointing that out. David Cameron also referred to the U.K. as a majority Christian country.
If you don't like to wear the label assumed by your former President then don't go painting Muslims by a similar label which a few minority extremists use and which the media is capitalising on and distorting.
If you compare the hundreds and thousands of casualties in the recent illegal wars on terror against the no. of casualties actually caused by muslim extremists (not the ones that have no evidence to support them like the 9/11 attack) you will find that the no. of casualties left by Muslim attacks pale into insignificance by the ones by your fellow countrymen.
In the future, please try to be a bit more respectful in the way you phrase your questions so that people don't take you the wrong way and respond in the way they've done so far.
Last edited: