HakimPtsid
Active member
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 1
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
You seem to be Indian as you are familiar with Hinduism and Sikhism rather then some of us who live the west that are more familiar with Christianity, Judaism and post enlightenment atheism.
No, I'm not Indian (I'm a white Australian living in New Zealand), I'm a Westerner. In my introduction post I mentioned that I grew up a Christian and went through a heavy Atheist phase in my teenage years.
How do you reconcile that Hindus allow lower caste members to worship Idols whilst that top caste have different rules like the Brahmans which one could say are monotheist?
I think it's a complex question in all honesty (and also once again requires a semantic clarification). Idols in the Dharmic religions are usually seen as simply symbolic, there's a lot you could read on it. I don't really see the idea of devoting to an 'idol' as any different from bowing to the Kaaba, as neither are worshiping an object, they are psychologically using the object to project into the divine and transcendent (God).
I can't say much for the caste system as I don't live in that kind of society, it's not something I really support myself, I'm more for non-hierarchical social structures myself (human-wise, as God is always absolute and outside of our social structures).
are you Pantheist or monotheist?
I've gone through several views and conceptions of God throughout my life and it's hard to answer without giving a non-answer.
In the sense of the absolute, I guess I might be a monotheist but I don't anthropomorphize God in any sense. I think the way we perceive God is more complex than we often realize.
- An atheist for instance will take the assumption that because they can't see God physically (which is a extreme misnomer as God isn't physical or a person, lol) that God doesn't exist, or they will find the concept of a non-physical (or an extrapersonal) force being the clockwork of the universe to be an absurdity or an irrational conception. - Generally these things always come down to semantic preconceptions, an atheist will often pose a strict dogma to give their position weight (such as the dogma of Materialism - that the physical world is all their is, everything can be explained by what is seen and touched, or thought)
- Taking that into consideration, a traditional monotheist will define God through a strict criteria of terminology based of their scriptures and a pantheist will define God as more of a philosophical conception of nature.
Through my own studies (including that of Islam), I tend to feel that each prefix of Theism together builds up a better idea of God than any one by itself.
Atheism constitutes the immediate experience of life through trying to rationalize the ineffable and immaterial - which through that lens, looks non-existent.
It is experienced through the monotheistic and polytheistic perception - God is experienced in a personal way, through a personal veil.
But God is beyond personal attribution (in spite of sending the Holy Quran and other scriptures).
Pantheism and panentheism both well-describe the way God manifests in the physical world (as a force) but fails to grasp what God is.
In Hinduism, the Brahman/Atman conception of God is probably one of the most beautiful we have as a planet, as with Surah 112 (quoted above) but at the end of it, it has to be truly internalized and experienced. I do believe God is beyond words, beyond language (the word "God" is only a word afterall)
Again, I have to conclude with what I warned, that I can only give a non-answer.
Maybe in a geometric sense (to make an analogy):Ultimately I'm asking whats your method on which religion you take when they all contradict each other?
Imagine a single point within a circle, now imagine each religion is a difference colored spiral from the center of the circle out towards the circumference. The circumference is God and the absolute reality, the point is us (self - but also time and culture). It all meets up and tries to comprehend the same thing but varies by theism (as I said in your previous question), time, culture/society, language (again), morals/ethics, ritual and so forth.
In my recent conversion to Islam, I feel it is one of the most powerful systems or ways to connect with God and that it hold a lot of absolute truth. But I don't feel it is entirely superior (at this point) to all other religions and I most certainly won't shut myself off to learning, knowledge and wisdom from other religions (and philosophy) just because I'm now partly-Muslim.