LOL, you make it ironic![]()
If you would like to post evidence of my racist tendancies I would be pleased to answer the charges. If not it would be proper to not make unfounded allegations toward other members.
LOL, you make it ironic![]()
Iamthestarman (5:17:34 PM): tasers?
Greensoap6 (5:17:35 PM): ya
Greensoap6 (5:17:53 PM): those cops need to get whooped
Iamthestarman (5:18:20 PM): nah.. i actually researched the whole thing
Greensoap6 (5:18:31 PM): its the kid's fault?
Iamthestarman (5:18:45 PM): the cops should be re-evaluated for incompetency
Greensoap6 (5:18:58 PM): is the kid suing?
Iamthestarman (5:19:09 PM): i think he's pursuing legal action
Iamthestarman (5:19:14 PM): but the kid is a dumbass
Iamthestarman (5:19:15 PM): he asked for it
Greensoap6 (5:19:21 PM): how so?
Greensoap6 (5:19:32 PM): they grabbed him as he was leaving right?
Iamthestarman (5:19:47 PM): well.. that's a point of contention
Iamthestarman (5:19:52 PM): some people say thats the case
Iamthestarman (5:19:55 PM): others are like no
Iamthestarman (5:20:07 PM): but before that part happened.. here's what happened
Iamthestarman (5:20:14 PM): (paraphrased)
Iamthestarman (5:20:24 PM): the kid was at the libraryIamthestarman (5:20:33 PM): the cso asks him for his id card
Iamthestarman (5:20:37 PM): he says he doesn't have itIamthestarman (5:20:41 PM): the cso asks him to leave
Iamthestarman (5:20:46 PM): he tells the cso to "**** off"
Iamthestarman (5:21:10 PM): now.. people who know the guy all know he's something of a trouble maker
Iamthestarman (5:21:27 PM): and also an idiot
Iamthestarman (5:21:36 PM): unanimously that's been stated
Iamthestarman (5:21:46 PM): given his response to the cso, i believe it
Iamthestarman (5:21:54 PM): if the guy said leave, i'd be like "alright.. okay"
Iamthestarman (5:22:08 PM): and just fumbled out while feeling ¬__¬
Iamthestarman (5:22:17 PM): so yeah
Iamthestarman (5:23:10 PM): so anyways
Iamthestarman (5:23:19 PM): apparently the cso is then like "alright let me go get the cops"
Greensoap6 (5:23:22 PM): wow, then he deserved it
Greensoap6 (5:23:29 PM): why did he evem do that?Greensoap6 (5:23:33 PM): thats so immature
Iamthestarman (5:23:47 PM): i think he feels like he was being selected for racial profilingIamthestarman (5:23:52 PM): according to himself
Greensoap6 (5:25:19 PM): is it true that he yelled
Greensoap6 (5:25:30 PM): "am I the only martyr here?"
Iamthestarman (5:25:53 PM): and "patriot act"
Greensoap6 (5:26:00 PM): so that's a yes?
Greensoap6 (5:26:10 PM): lol, this kid is retarded
Iamthestarman (5:26:13 PM): in an effort to appeal to his fellow bleeding heart liberals i guess
Iamthestarman (5:26:17 PM): ucla is full of those
Greensoap6 (5:26:28 PM): i feel dirty defending him in forums bro
If you would like to post evidence of my racist tendancies I would be pleased to answer the charges. If not it would be proper to not make unfounded allegations toward other members.
I suggest u do the same. Not everyone here would think its posted cuz the student might have been Muslim. Your kinda generalizing. Talk about preconceived notions. I see double standardsI cant speak for anyone else, but i was definitely wasnt thinking it.
Btw, im only referring to the second sentence of ur post.
Anyways, back on topic :hiding:
Yes, so do I.I see double standards
Well let me ask you, would the story have been posted here if it was a white guy with no religion?
We all know that the answer is 'of course not.' Why would it have been?
Yes, so do I.
Gary was eluding to the same point I was attempting to make, which is that the only reason there is so much "outrage" on this forum is because the guy happened to be Iranian-American. This sort of stuff happens every day to drunk frat guys, unruly basketball fans, guys who flash a football game, etc. This isn't some premeditated act of racism against the poor abused Muslims. It was a police overreaction that happens about once an hour in the U.S. Not saying it isn't a bad deal...but c'mon.
Pardon? Let's look back. First Keltoi said,Lol that isnt the point...dont go out of context...k thnx!
What u said earlier still backfired on u.
Then I said,Would this even be discussed on this forum if the kid wasn't an "Iranian-American" student? I realize this is a Muslim forum, but by creating a thread of this nature one is led to believe this happened because the kid was Iranian-American, and haven't seen any evidence to support this supposed racial component.
And then I said,No, it would not have been discussed. The actual racial assumption here, is that he was a muslim. Is it correct to assume that any person associated with Iran is muslim? Obviously, the connection being made to the relevance of this forum, is that he is muslim. But is he?
Tsk, Tsk. Preconceived notions are the roots of racial hatred and violence.
Then you said,Originally Posted by GARY
If you would like to post evidence of my racist tendancies I would be pleased to answer the charges. If not it would be proper to not make unfounded allegations toward other members.
And I responded with,I suggest u do the same. Not everyone here would think its posted cuz the student might have been Muslim. Your kinda generalizing. Talk about preconceived notions. I see double standardsI cant speak for anyone else, but i was definitely wasnt thinking it.
Btw, im only referring to the second sentence of ur post.
Anyways, back on topic :hiding:
Which leads us to,Well let me ask you, would the story have been posted here if it was a white guy with no religion?
We all know that the answer is 'of course not.' Why would it have been?
Lol that isnt the point...dont go out of context...k thnx!
What u said earlier still backfired on u.
. I did not state that everyone here thought this, my statement was that that is what the original poster of the thread was thinking. Certainly some others also thought the same though.Not everyone here would think its posted cuz the student might have been Muslim.
This part I just don't understand.What u said earlier still backfired on u.
I am a little confused? What IS the point? And why are you following me?Lol that isnt the point...
Because u make useless comments. my point was, although u think we cared cuz it was possibly about a Muslim, that ISNT true. Kapeesh?
You stated we have pre conceived notions and i said I dont think like that so ur makin assumptions. Thats why i said "double standards." Do i need to repeat myself or have u finally gotten it?
I'm not following u. Dont get paranoid my friend.
Even if he is a troublemaker, you don't taser someone like that.
By that logic, I'd be able to temporarily ban anyone I wanted to simply because they got on my nerves rather than because they broke a rule. I'd have to think twice before becoming so mean-spirited.Why not? Serves him right, don't you think? Teach him not to be such a jerk. Wasting valuable law enforcement time. What if somebody was in real trouble somewhere else needing help, and this jerk is tying them up with his "look at me the martyr" routine?
Zap him again I say.
By that logic, I'd be able to temporarily ban anyone I wanted to simply because they got on my nerves rather than because they broke a rule. I'd have to think twice before becoming so mean-spirited.
I still think they should have just cuffed him and simply dragged him out.
Since when has not showing your library card been a crime worthy of repeated electric shock? (rapists and murderers get a jail sentence, but a student without a library card gets 200 volts?!) The UCPD are clearly in the wrong here as the mere intimidation of 4 officers would have been more than enough for the student to leave (I don't know about you, but if 4 UCPDs come up to me and say move, I move) - which he would have done if the UCPDs hadn't started shocking the crap outta him. Infact, during the zapping, the student was actually out of the library, sure he pretty much crawled his way out, but I guess being shocked several times kind of does that to you.He did break rules though.
Oh come on.He was also looking to play the martyr role.
What, electronic convulsive therapy?He got exactly what he wanted.
Since when has not showing your library card been a crime worthy of repeated electric shock? (rapists and murderers get a jail sentence, but a student without a library card gets 200 volts?!) The UCPD are clearly in the wrong here as the mere intimidation of 4 officers would have been more than enough for the student to leave (I don't know about you, but if 4 UCPDs come up to me and say move, I move) - which he would have done if the UCPDs hadn't started shocking the crap outta him. Infact, during the zapping, the student was actually out of the library, sure he pretty much crawled his way out, but I guess being shocked several times kind of does that to you.
Oh come on.
What, electronic convulsive therapy?
. It may come as a surprise to you, but in most countries you are obligated by law to co-operate with authorities. Telling them to "**** off" as he did, is hardly co-operating.My Muslim brother said that the Iranian had a reputation for being a trouble maker and that he's constantly paranoid of racial profiling.
Actually, tazers are usually a minimum of around 50,000 volts if I am not mistaken.rapists and murderers get a jail sentence, but a student without a library card gets 200 volts?!)
Most people would move. But believe it, there are a few people around that are not like most people. There are some people that will resist just to be an ass.The UCPD are clearly in the wrong here as the mere intimidation of 4 officers would have been more than enough for the student to leave (I don't know about you, but if 4 UCPDs come up to me and say move, I move)
He was also looking to play the martyr role.
What's the problem? Young muslim men glorify the idea of being a martyr. They blow themselves up to inflict damage on the enemy. You think it is not possible that this guy would take the relatively small sacrifice to "prove" that the authorities are racist and anti-muslim?Oh come on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.