- Qatada -
Spread this Avatar!
- Messages
- 11,349
- Reaction score
- 2,692
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Re: Spiritual wisdom v/s Religious dogma
I don't think you understand the concept of a child.
Looks like you've been ignoring it again. Did you see that picture before?
Is that a child? If so - how did she give birth? And did you read the fatwa earlier on:
from Shaykh 'Abdul-'Azîz ibn Ahmad Ad-Durayhim:
Keep repeating your same claims and i'll keep pasting the same stuff.
And you know when you say that marrying a child isn't permitted in other religions, maybe you could give proof for that.
If you don't, that means your claim doesn't hold much weight either, because what is forbidden should be clearly stated in the texts. So maybe you could give proof from your own scripture too?
Doesn't look like it:
When did i say lust was a sin? I think it was you wasn't it? I said if we have a desire, it is channelled in a way which will become permissible. I.e. marriage for ones sexual desire instead of commiting fornication.
So if God created one with desire in this world, what's so confusing about having a desire in the hereafter?
So intoxicants are alright in this world? I've seen some sikhs get drunk and they seem really attatched to this world, just check out bhangra videos.
Now if that's a vice, and their wearing turbans - shall i start saying that their doing a good job of representing sikhs? I know i won't steep that low because people might follow a way of life but not be into it whole heartedly or in the correct way.
Anyway, those who are strict want to be with God in the next world right? How about the others - why do they want to mess about because that can lead them to not be with God?
Does any of the other religions ever say that it OK for someone in 40's to marry a child? Even there are laws in civilized societies today.
I don't think you understand the concept of a child.

Is that a child? If so - how did she give birth? And did you read the fatwa earlier on:
from Shaykh 'Abdul-'Azîz ibn Ahmad Ad-Durayhim:
As for the possible negative consequences of a man of such a mature age marrying such a young girl, it is patently obvious. The discrepancies in their capabilities, both physically and mentally, could bring about serious differences between the two of them that could lead to the failure of the marriage. This is something that has been seen and is well understood.
Therefore, I would not recommend such a marriage nor would I encourage it.
Moreover, with respect to what we have said about the legal validity of such a marriage, that refers to the validity of the contract itself. As for the effects of the marriage - such as privacy, intimacy and sexual relations - that is another matter entirely. Such things are permitted only if the girl is able to handle such a relationship without any harm whatsoever coming to. Otherwise, it is prohibited. This is because the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "There shall be no harm nor the causing of harm."
It can also be seen in the very conduct of the Prophet (peace be upon him). He did not consummate his marriage with 'A’ishah for a number of years on account of her young age.
And from the fatwâ committee supervised by Shaykh 'Abdul-Wahhâb At-Turayrî we note:Therefore, I would not recommend such a marriage nor would I encourage it.
Moreover, with respect to what we have said about the legal validity of such a marriage, that refers to the validity of the contract itself. As for the effects of the marriage - such as privacy, intimacy and sexual relations - that is another matter entirely. Such things are permitted only if the girl is able to handle such a relationship without any harm whatsoever coming to. Otherwise, it is prohibited. This is because the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: "There shall be no harm nor the causing of harm."
It can also be seen in the very conduct of the Prophet (peace be upon him). He did not consummate his marriage with 'A’ishah for a number of years on account of her young age.
The lawfulness of consummating a marriage at such an age is contingent on the maturity of the girl and that no harm would come to her.
So if any harm would come from it, then it is unlawful i.e. harâm.
Keep repeating your same claims and i'll keep pasting the same stuff.

And you know when you say that marrying a child isn't permitted in other religions, maybe you could give proof for that.

No it's the other way. Relationship of soul to God is compared to that of wife and husband. It doesn't mean the husband is God.
Doesn't look like it:
- Thakur ek sabaaee Naar: There is one Lord ("Akaal Purakh"), and all are His brides (sggs 933).
- Mai kaamani meraa kant kartaar: I am the bride; the Creator is my Husband Lord (sggs 1128).
- http://www.gurbani.org/webart29.htm
If you believe in purification, how come you don't believe in avoiding all of the vices like lust? In fact, you even believe that these things exist even when you go to paradise.
When did i say lust was a sin? I think it was you wasn't it? I said if we have a desire, it is channelled in a way which will become permissible. I.e. marriage for ones sexual desire instead of commiting fornication.
So if God created one with desire in this world, what's so confusing about having a desire in the hereafter?
Guru Granth Sahib believes in achieving such a spiritual stage where you are forever in a bliss and you don't need any intoxicants... Of course, there are strict instructions to Amritdhari (baptized) Sikhs.
So intoxicants are alright in this world? I've seen some sikhs get drunk and they seem really attatched to this world, just check out bhangra videos.

Anyway, those who are strict want to be with God in the next world right? How about the others - why do they want to mess about because that can lead them to not be with God?