Who has the right to the land? Israelians or Palestinians?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sinbad
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 117
  • Views Views 11K
Status
Not open for further replies.
I heard that Palestinians are simply Arabs who came to Palestina from Syria and Lebanon lands.

If not, tell me if there was any palestinian king or emperor in history?

Many people will say many things, all of them are right, palestinians have been there before, they also came in the 1920s as guest workers, all of them are right.

Today they are arabs, before Israel arabs hated palestinians, the leasers still do, they treat them worse than israel. After Israel was created they started to support palestinians cause they hated the jews more. Today they are arabs, but they are not arabs by race.

If you look at an ethnicity map syrians are arabs. but they dont spek or look arabic, and they hate being called arabs.

I havent answered your queston, but yet I have, the truth is palestinians are all people that happens to be muslims and in an area drawen in a brittish map.
 
You can not use islam on this, it works great with other muslims but not evereyone else. I asked for a proof that islam is gods religion even if jesus warned us over and over again to not follow a prophet after him. They said "ismael predicted islam", the child slave belonging to abraham i guess. But it only says so in islam not judaism or christianity.


Can you quote where Jesus said that there wouldn't be any prophets after him?


"Allah gave the land to the jews as long as they respected hes prophets, if they didnt, they would lose it."

The cananites where eradicated, the palestinians are semites, jews converting to islam. Medina was a very jewish city untill they became muslims.


No it wasn't, the majority of the people in Medina were arabs. The two tribes of 'Aws and Khazraj were a greater number than the jews. The jews were more literate however.


The palestinians where once jews, evereyone was something else before muhammed and islam.


There were many different groups of people in Greater Syria (Al-Shaam.) There could have been Byzantinian Romans, Persian Sassanids [due to the continuous conflicts they had] - there could be arabs who had become bedouins from Yemen and moved to Greater Syria, so it was a mixture of many many different groups of people.


Modern times does allow counqest, its not an "old way". After ww2 The russians occupied eastern finland, Vidborg was a finnish city, but all the finns where pushed out today its an all russian city wiht people who lost their homes in Stalingrad.
Why is it not a debate over this?

Palestine if you will has always been inhabided by jews even before islam. The last having it was the brittish, they gave it to the jews, why does palestinian muslims have right to it?


So if we're using this logic, what's the US's problem with the Iranians having nukes? I'm not saying i support that, but we're using that logic here.


I do not support Israel, but I do not support Palestine either. They are 2 unimportant nations that take up to much news.

But Who has the right to the land? Israel of course.


Those are just your views, and others differ.
 
I think that except discussing who has more rigts to this land, we sould rather consider how there can be peace between Jews and Arabs, and how to create two free states there.
 
I think that except discussing who has more rigts to this land, we sould rather consider how there can be peace between Jews and Arabs, and how to create two free states there.
That would involve compromise. Neither are interested. Nothing is more important than victory. Peace doesn't even come in a close second,
 
This should Help this argument.

Its a short clip on Jewish group that says Israel (Zionism) should not exist.

"A Jewish rabbi goes on Fox news to declare that under Judaism, Jews are not meant to have a state and therefore Israel should not exist. "

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ffUTRjQSihk
 
:sl:

In the name of Allaah ta'ala, the most gracious, the most merciful.

Every now and than someone feels the urge to ask this question on one of these Islaamic forums and the same points are made by both sides with either side not budging one inch, so ask yourself, whats the point?

Every single 'Isreali' and Palestinian knows that the land of Al Quds belongs to the Muslims and the home-land of the palestinains will remain just that, their home. We all know the palestinian people and this 'Umma of at'tawheed will continue to stand for justice and that which is right and never give up this cause.

The last fifty years have been years of oppression and brutality perpretrated by the zionists, come fifty years time there will be no 'Isreal' and fifty years later no-one will even remember 'Isreal'.

The rockets will continue to rain down upon the butchers of Tel Aviv and the fighters from Hamas and Islaamic Jihaad will never give-up this just cause.

:w:

Confirmation on what I said:
Peace doesn't even come in a close second
 
You can not use islam on this, it works great with other muslims but not evereyone else. I asked for a proof that islam is gods religion even if jesus warned us over and over again to not follow a prophet after him. They said "ismael predicted islam", the child slave belonging to abraham i guess. But it only says so in islam not judaism or christianity.

My point? It only works for fellow muslims.

Ok, and my point is that YOUR argument works for those Jews & Christians who share your view, and not Muslims.

Those non-Muslims who share our outlook, will be satisfied with our proof and disatisfied with yours.

Your proof doesn't work for us, and ours doesn't work for you, oh well.

Therefore, we are at an impasse...

The cananites where eradicated,

Eradicated by whom and when? Who immediately followed? Other Arabs (of the same lineage), or Jews?

them the palestinians are semites,

Arabs and Jews are Semites. Therefore, an Arab (nowadays) can also play the anti-Semitism card :thumbs_up

jews converting to islam. Medina was a very jewish city untill they became muslims.
Wrong my friend, there were more Arab idolaters than Jewish inhabitants in Medina. It cannot be classified as a "very jewish city." They were not the majority, nor were they a significant minority, compared to the Arab tribes in Medina.

Also, most Jews DID NOT convert to Islam. And the Jewish tribes that resided in medina were banished from it for their treason in wartime, and did not convert to Islam.

The palestinians where once jews,
Huh? Kindly present your proof
Modern times does allow counqest, its not an "old way".
Cool. Then God Willing, it'll be reconquered again, and returned to its rightful owners, the Palestinians.

This reminds me of Gamal Abdel Nassers quote" "What was taken by force, will be returned by force."

Palestine if you will has always been inhabided by jews
Not always. When have Jews ever been the majority in Palestine?

As for nowadays, the only reasons for them being temporarily classified as a majority, was after the massive Russian influx of Jews during Gorbachev's reign.

They also became the majority after building illegal settlements from militarily conquered Palestinian land (after the 1967 War, and considered illegal and under occupation, by the U.N.) and not forgetting the continuous ethnic cleansing and daily slaughtering of Palestinian civilians, by the IOF: The Israeli Occupation Forces.

The last having it was the brittish, they gave it to the jews,
The British Occupied Palestine, they DID NOT inhabitit.

They gave it to the Jews after Betraying the Arabs with their Balfour Declaration and I believe the Sykes/Picot Agreement.

I do not support Israel, but I do not support Palestine either. They are 2 unimportant nations that take up to much news.

But Who has the right to the land? Israel of course.

If they are unimportant and take up too much news, why did you take up the space by creating this thread?

if they're unimportant to you, why are you so concerned and intrigued by it?

if they're unimportant, then why support Israel, when you can Just ignore it. Since it's a trivial topic and unimportant?
 
Shalom, I will responded to a few posts I could not let slip by. I hope I offend no one when sharing my views.

The palestinians where once jews, evereyone was something else before muhammed and islam.

I sincerely doubt that the above statement is true. Most likely, they were not Jews.

Arabs and Jews are Semites. Therefore, an Arab (nowadays) can also play the anti-Semitism card

The word "anti-semite" does not mean literally anti any member of humanity who is ethnically a "semite", but means "anti-Jewish".

Not always. When have Jews ever been the majority in Palestine?

As for nowadays, the only reasons for them being temporarily classified as a majority, was after the massive Russian influx of Jews during Gorbachev's reign.

They also became the majority after building illegal settlements from militarily conquered Palestinian land (after the 1967 War, and considered illegal and under occupation, by the U.N.) and not forgetting the continuous ethnic cleansing and daily slaughtering of Palestinian civilians, by the IOF: The Israeli Occupation Forces.

The Jewish people in the 1920's etc made up enough of the population to be granted when the Palestine Mandate was divided 20% of the land which was given to the Jews. While 80% was given the Arabs according to proportions, and that 80% became the state of Jordan. Look at the Palestinians flag and the Jordanian one. Check it out @ google.

http://unimaps.com/flags-mideast/palestine-flag.gif
http://unimaps.com/flags-mideast/jordan-flag.gif

They gave it to the Jews after Betraying the Arabs with their Balfour Declaration and I believe the Sykes/Picot Agreement.

On the contrary, a reasonable amount of imigration occured in a place where no one had any national identity, so they divided it.

The area of the Mandate was originally 118,000 square kilometers (about 45,000 square miles). In 1921, Britain took the 91,000 square kilometers of the Palestine Mandate east of the Jordan River, and created Trans-Jordan (later the Arab country of Jordan) as a new Arab protectorate. Jews were barred by law from living or owning property east of the Jordan river, even though that land was over three-fourths of the original Mandate.

In 1923, Britain ceded the Golan Heights (another 1,176 square kilometers of the Palestine Mandate) to the French Mandate of Syria. Jews were also barred from living there. Jewish settlers on the Golan Heights were forced to abandon their homes and relocate inside the westerb area of the British Mandate.

The total remaining area of the Mandate for Palestine, after these land deductions, was just under 26,000 square kilometers (about 10,000 square miles). The southern part of the Mandate – the desert of the Negev – was also closed by the British to Jewish settlement. The area was inhabited by 15,000 roaming Bedouins, and had no Jewish or Arab settlements in it.

The balance of the Mandate, the inhabited part of Palestine, and only the part west of the Jordan, was just 14,000 square kilometers. Jewish immigration was limited by the British from time to time, especially after the periods of Arab riots and severely restricted after 1939. At the same time, Arab immigration was not restricted or even recorded. By 1948, when the State of Israel was founded, 1.8 million people lived the western area of the Mandate, estimated to be 600,000 Jews and 1.2 million Arabs. Following the war between the Jews and the Arabs in 1948, the inhabited areas of the 14,000 square kilometers were divided along cease-fire lines between Israel and Jordan/Egypt. 8,000 square kilometers, or 57% of the reduced area (which is only 6.7% of the original Mandate territory), became Israel. The rest of the area of western Palestine, 5,700 square kilometers of historic Judea and Samaria, was annexed by Jordan – and renamed the West Bank - while 360 square kilometers were occupied by Egypt and called the Gaza Strip.​

Although I may not agree 100% due to religious reasons, the Zionist ideology advocates the return of Jews to the land of their ancestors from which they were exiled by brutal military conquests. There were two such major exiles in Jewish history - in 586 BCE and six hundred fifty-eight years later, in 72 AD. Both exiles were associated with the total destruction of Jerusalem, the ancient Jewish capital, and the demolition of its temple. The eastern hill of Jerusalem where the citadel captured by King David once stood, south of the Temple Mound, has been called Mount Zion. This name became synonymous with Jerusalem; hence Zionism.

Halevi immigrated to Israel in 1141. So were hundreds of Jewish Rabbis who immigrated to Israel in 1211, followed by Nahmanides is 1267. And so were hundreds of other Jewish spiritual leaders and scholars and thousands of their followers who came to the Land of Israel over hundreds of years, way before the modern political Zionist movement was even born.

As a result of the perpetual yearning of the Jewish people for the Land of Israel, Jewish communities existed there continuously since the destruction of the Second Temple to date, notwithstanding its destroyed or occupied capital. Obviously, there were Jewish communities in that land since the emergence of the Judaic nation with its unique culture, about thirteen hundred years earlier. The presence of Romans, Byzantines, Arabs, Christian Crusaders and Muslim Ottomans in their homeland, did not prevent Jews from maintaining their presence there. It definitely did not reduce the aspiration to regain possession of their land and to rebuild their ancient capital.

So please abandon the notion that millions of Jews who were all white (when over 50% of the Jews in Israel are Arab-Jews) came and began stealing land, when it is not the case.

Cool. Then God Willing, it'll be reconquered again, and returned to its rightful owners, the Palestinians.

This reminds me of Gamal Abdel Nassers quote" "What was taken by force, will be returned by force."

I'm sorry if any Native Americans are offended but the above quote seemed to have failed them.

Although in about 700 years, if Native Americans retake America, from the "white man" then it could be compared to the Jews coming back and reclaiming a land which archeologically proves their existance on it, before the birth of Mohammad.

Its a short clip on Jewish group that says Israel (Zionism) should not exist.

"A Jewish rabbi goes on Fox news to declare that under Judaism, Jews are not meant to have a state and therefore Israel should not exist.

I would just like to point out, that these people are insane. Yes, Zionism and Judaism do not match well together, but these people are full of ignorance when it comes to Jewish law (Halakha). Many violate the Torah in numerous aspects.

I just wanted to warn you that although you may seek out whatever Jewish source you wish, I would not consider the Hashkafah's of these people to be very "Jewish".

Would you allow a barbaric overtake of your home? And be left to sit in the bathroom all day...and when you did come out you were spat at, kicked, beaten....I'll let you think about that.

What a generalization from someone who is part of a religion which is at times unfairly discriminated or grouped together, when Islam is such a diverse religion. Now in turn you are demonizing all Israeli's the same way, they demonize you, the same way Serbs demonized Muslims, the same way nazi's demonized Jews.

I'll let you think about that.

Peace to all of you. I'm not really in the mood to debate, so please if you wish respond, but it is pointless, since we will all believe what we do.
 
Last edited:
Once the land is in the power of the palestinians then there will be justice!

****************
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cananites where eradicated

:sl:

Source?

the palestinians are semites

as were the Canaanites

jews converting to islam.

source?

The palestinians where once jews, evereyone was something else before muhammed and islam.

Ok let me get this straight according to you Palestinians are descendants of jews that converted to Islam(would love to see peer reviewed evidence backing your claim), if this is the case then it's not Palestinians you have a problem with it is ''Islam''

Indeed why would someone state he supports those indigineous to the region and use history to justify his reason for support yet contradict himself when a indigineous group of the same region has a different religion and therefore suddenly don't deserve to be supported in their quest for Nationhood?

there are Palestinian Christians who are descendants of the original ones do these communities have your support? or does everybody have to practice Judaism for them to be recognised as indigineous communities?

Palestine if you will has always been inhabided by jews even before islam. The last having it was the brittish, they gave it to the jews, why does palestinian muslims have right to it?

And Proto-Palestinians inhabited it before Judaism

but tell me, if i took your mobile phone and gave it to the milk man are you saying you would no longer have the right to claim it back?:D wow

I do not support Israel, but I do not support Palestine either. They are 2 unimportant nations that take up to much news.

Yet important enough for you to start a topic about them

But Who has the right to the land? Israel of course.

I do not support Israel
:D

Shalom.

The word "anti-semite" does not mean literally anti any member of humanity who is ethnically a "semite", but means "anti-Jewish".

:sl:
Then you would agree with me when i say this term anti-semetism in reality is illogical and bankrupt when used in the Palestine-Israel debate?

:w:
 
:sl:

In the name of Allaah ta'ala, the most gracious, the most merciful.

Every now and than someone feels the urge to ask this question on one of these Islaamic forums and the same points are made by both sides with either side not budging one inch, so ask yourself, whats the point?

Every single 'Isreali' and Palestinian knows that the land of Al Quds belongs to the Muslims and the home-land of the palestinains will remain just that, their home. We all know the palestinian people and this 'Umma of at'tawheed will continue to stand for justice and that which is right and never give up this cause.

The last fifty years have been years of oppression and brutality perpretrated by the zionists, come fifty years time there will be no 'Isreal' and fifty years later no-one will even remember 'Isreal'.

The rockets will continue to rain down upon the butchers of Tel Aviv and the fighters from Hamas and Islaamic Jihaad will never give-up this just cause.

:w:


That is what is needed here! New ideas. Thanks Hashim.
 
:sl:

In the name of Allaah ta'ala, the most gracious, the most merciful.

Every now and than someone feels the urge to ask this question on one of these Islaamic forums and the same points are made by both sides with either side not budging one inch, so ask yourself, whats the point?

Every single 'Isreali' and Palestinian knows that the land of Al Quds belongs to the Muslims and the home-land of the palestinains will remain just that, their home. We all know the palestinian people and this 'Umma of at'tawheed will continue to stand for justice and that which is right and never give up this cause.

The last fifty years have been years of oppression and brutality perpretrated by the zionists, come fifty years time there will be no 'Isreal' and fifty years later no-one will even remember 'Isreal'.

The rockets will continue to rain down upon the butchers of Tel Aviv and the fighters from Hamas and Islaamic Jihaad will never give-up this just cause.

:w:


With this kind of attitude the innocent blood in Holy Land wont stop flowing.
 
I would say Israel has the right to all of that land really, the land was conquered just as the people living in the land was conquered. Then Israel fought its own war with the surrounding nations and won again, they obviously have all rights to the land, after all, the land doesnt really belong to either of these groups "originally"... who really knows for a fact who was there originally anyways? Not only that but who cares?! Nearly every piece of land in the world has been conquered or has conquered others to establish its boundaries. The problem in Palestine is the "militant islam" mind set, there is no government really so the people that fight Israel, fight like cowards and hide amongst "civilians" (if there is such a thing in palestine) and launch rockets at random targets. Basically these people need to recognize defeat, if this was an all out war (which it already was) these people would lose (as they already did once) so now since they cant win in war and have been conquered they choose to terrorize the winners until they give up the land (which they never will). Basically there will come a day when Israel will draw a line and declare a war against Palestine, and I am not talking about the fighters in Palestine, I am talking about every living person. Sadly I think that day is approaching (maybe within 5 years) and then the problem will be solved. It is Israels land and unless the Palestinians quit launching rockets, it will eventually all be Israels land.
 
Now that we've seen that post ^ This hadith doesn't seem that violent afterall:

The Dajjaal (anti-christ) will die at the hands of the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam/Jesus son of Mary (peace be upon him), as is indicated by the saheeh/authentic ahaadeeth.

The Dajjaal will appear on earth and will gain many followers, spreading his fitnah/trials/temptations far and wide. No one will escape his fitnah except a few of the believers.


At that point, ‘Eesa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him) will descend to the eastern minaret in Damascus, and the believing slaves of Allaah will gather around him. He will lead them towards the Dajjaal, who at the time of the descent of ‘Eesa (peace be upon him) will be heading for Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem). ‘Eesa will catch up with him at the gate of Ludd (Lod), a place in Palestine near Bayt al-Maqdis. When the Dajjaal sees him, he will start to melt like salt melting in water, but ‘Eesa (peace be upon him) will say to him, “I have some business with you, you will not get away from me.” Then he will catch up with him and will kill him with his spear. His followers will flee, pursued by the Muslims, who will kill them, and trees and rocks will say, ‘O Muslim, O slave of Allaah, there is Jew behind me – come and kill him!” – apart from the gharqad (box thorn), for it is one of the trees of the Jews.

http://www.islamicboard.com/basics-islam/37058-al-dajjaal-alive-right-now-what-his-attributes.html



 
Last edited:
Now that we've seen that post ^ This hadith doesn't seem that violent afterall:

Fi,

Why does my post seem violent to you? What seems violent is that even after a truce, even after a war is won, guerrilla and civil war persists. Do you not believe the land was "won" or "taken" fair and square? Every Arabian, european and otherwise was once a different country. These lands dont wage a war like this after losing for the next half century, so why is it OK for the palestinians or muslims in general to do this? Is it because you feel you have some sort of divine right to this land? What about Mecca, is that not enough? Non Muslims are not even allowed on this land, does that seem fair to you? My point in my post above is to illustrate my frustration with the so called guerrilla warfare and it is a view that is shared by many. It is a war that is being waged by Palestinians where the Israelis are not allowed to kill the enemy for fear of whatever their "status" may be. The land is Israels and God willing it will be Israels forever, these people have as much rights to the land as anyone else and then some since they have conquered and defended it. Palestine at this point has an opportunity to keep its portion, but I fear if it keeps up its seemingly endless barrage of mortar attacks the Israelis will continue to increase their hostility and their attacks until Palestine will be fully attacked, invaded and slaughtered.


Please note I do not wish for this to happen, I wish that the Palestinians would just recognize Israel and be happy with what they have, their greed for this land will be their demise
 
Last edited:
MTAFFI, if you've seen Islamic history - you'll realise that when the Christians didn't allow the jews to enter this blessed land, it was the Muslims who actually allowed them in and gave them their rights. That's because this is our duty as muslims. You'll see that wherever Muslim rule was (The Ummaya Dynasty in Spain, The Turkish Ottomans etc), the jews settled there along with them, yet they never settled within a christian state. You know why? Because they feared persecution from the christians.

If the muslims are living within that state, then yes we have lost the land by the will of Allaah, and it will return as it has been prophecised.


Even if the jews have authority there now, atleast they should be just, and treat the muslims with respect. The same way they have been safe under Muslim rule for many, many centuries - safe from the persecution they would face if living in another state.

Yet that isn't the case at all, i have seen many videos on the brutality and hardship the muslims are facing within that country. And even if it is under Jewish rule, that doesn't mean they have the right to harm these people. Especially when it's these people themselves who were once in a similar situation;


Remember! Moses said to his people: "Call to mind the favour of Allah to you when He delivered you from the people of Pharaoh: they set you hard tasks and punishments, slaughtered your sons, and let your women-folk live: therein was a tremendous trial from your Lord."

[Qur'an 14:6]


Yet it's so ironical that today it's these exact same people who are doing the same thing as Pharoah, they shoot little children who throw rocks, and then accuse Islaam of being terrorism.


But anyway, i don't need to cry out to anyone besides Allaah since He is the All Hearer, All Aware. And after hardship He grants ease, and He tests the believers the same way He tested the believers of the Children of Israel (Jacob/Ya'qub.)


Allaah's Messenger, Muhammad (peace be upon him) spoke the truth when he said:

“This community of mine is a community blessed with mercy. It is not punished in the Hereafter. Instead, it is punished in this world with strife, instability, and bloodshed.” [Musnad Ahmad, Sunan Abî Dâwûd, and Mustadrak al-Hâkim] It is an authentic hadîth. It indicates that Allah has shown mercy on the Islamic community and that its punishment will be in this world instead of the Hereafter.



Regards.









 
Even if the jews have authority there now, atleast they should be just, and treat the muslims with respect. The same way they have been safe under Muslim rule for many, many centuries - safe from the persecution they would face if living in another state.
[/COLOR]



In Israel live, work, study about 1 million muslim Arabs.
Arabs have their own political parties in Knesset.
Lately one Arab became a minister in Israel's goverment.
Arabs living in Israel dont have to carry weapons like Jews living among Palestinians.
They can vote and worship like normal, equal citizens.
Israel even tolerates those Israeli Arabs who openly support Hamas or Hesbullah.
So it is not so bad as you think for Arabs living in Israel.
And about those who live in West Bank and Gaza...I am sure that without terroristic attacks there would be no wall, no patrols, no controls..
When someone makes a suicide attack he cant cry after that his fellows are controled by army.
 
In Israel live, work, study about 1 million muslim Arabs.
Arabs have their own political parties in Knesset.
Lately one Arab became a minister in Israel's goverment.
Arabs living in Israel dont have to carry weapons like Jews living among Palestinians.
They can vote and worship like normal, equal citizens.
Israel even tolerates those Israeli Arabs who openly support Hamas or Hesbullah.
So it is not so bad as you think for Arabs living in Israel.
And about those who live in West Bank and Gaza...I am sure that without terroristic attacks there would be no wall, no patrols, no controls..
When someone makes a suicide attack he cant cry after that his fellows are controled by army.



118 Israeli children have been killed by Palestinians and 934 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis since September 29, 2000. (View Source)


1,021 Israelis and at least 4,098 Palestinians have been killed since September 29, 2000. (View Source)


7,633 Israelis and 31,307 Palestinians have been injured since September 29, 2000. (View Source)


The U.S. gives more than $7,023,288 per day to the Israeli government and military and gives no money to the Palestinians. (View Source)


Israel has been targeted by at least 65 UN resolutions and the Palestinians have been targeted by none. (View Source)


1 Israeli is being held prisoner by Palestinians, while 10,756 Palestinians are currently imprisoned by Israel. (View Source)


0 Israeli homes have been demolished by Palestinians and 4,170 Palestinian homes have been demolished by Israel since September 29, 2000. (View Source)


The Israeli unemployment rate is 9%, while the Palestinian unemployment is estimated at 40%. (View Source)


Israel currently has 223 Jewish-only settlements and ‘outposts’ built on confiscated Palestinian land. Palestinians do not have any settlements on Israeli land. (View Source)


Who is oppressing who here?

check out -
http://ifamericansknew.com/
 
Last edited:
No one's going to like this, but...

It doesn't matter who the land really belongs to. The reality is that the Jews are there now. The Isralies are in control, and no one is going to be able to push them out. If the Palestinians want peace, they will have to accept the permenant existence of Israel. Different people have lost their homelands all throughout history. Should the U.S. give all it's land back to the Indians? Should the Indians that Columbus met give the land they had back to the tribe they conquored it from? Should Turkey give back Constantinople?
 
August, i get your point. But if you look at todays times, you'll realise that the game is that 'you can't take over someones land.' And anyone who tries to do that, the US intervenes and says that this group is evil for doing that. Therefore i'm sure you see the double standards in regard to this situation.


Thanks for your input though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top