Liberal Democracy PROVED its failure when compared to Islamic Sharia beside that if we make general comparison:
1- Sharia: Is made for All Man Kind and not Muslims only!
Liberal Democracy: Made for specific group and dont care about others even if this means waging wars or killing others for money and power and stealing fortunes!
No, Sharia does favor muslims. Under sharia, I cant question the Qur'an or Muhammed, or even vote to change aspects of the constitution. I also cant promote my faith and evangelize (assuming I had one). If I were gay, I would be stonned. I would not be able to have a quiet lunch outside with my female friends in casual wear etc.
Plz point out what aspect of liberal democracy favors one group over another.
2- Sharia: Solves all social problems from roots!
Liberal Democracy: failed to solve a lot of social problems, but actually it gave a good space for those problems to grow!
Except for economic problems such as business cycles, financial contagion, FDI leverage, Tragedy of the commons, disgruntled minorities etc.
At its best, a sharia state would be like a much less flexible Keynesian state. The Keynesian state ultimately failed because of stagflation. Sharia state would be less flexible and the global economics conditions are even more accelerated so there is no real to believe it happen again to a Sharia state only faster.
Please tell me which social problem a liberal democracy model hlped grow. If you mean women's rights, minority rights, ending slavery etc, you are correct. How dare these non-men and whites think they are ppl?
laying:
3-Sharia: Is made by GOD (I know this you dont believe) and it were given to us by ONE Illiterate man living in Desert!
Liberal Democracy: Is made by HUMANS a lot of them!
And a non-muslim would argue Sharia is made by a human (muhammed) or a small group of them. Better the combined minds of intellectuals as opposed to the a small group of minds of ancient theologians.
4-Sharia: CONTAIN EVIL inside and outside!
Liberal Democracy: cannot contain EVIL!
I assume you mean "moral evils" because I have shown that real nasty stuff is actually fanned under a wholly shariah state.
The moral assumption is entirely subjective and as I said, most states are non-muslim so this doesnt hold water either.
5- Sharia: gives freedom and protection for all man kind (women before men) with balance between personal freedom and general freedom of the community!
Liberal Democracy: only give FAKE Personal freedom!
What is "fake personal freedom"? If you mean right to vote, education, freedom from persecution, freedom to practise religion etc. Then thats entirely a liberal democracies doing.
Those are some General comparisons,
but we can also compare Islamic Laws comparing it to all other systems now and in History, and you will find that all MAJOR EVIL didnt come from MUSLIM communities but from non Muslim communities whether they are religious or not!
Actually if you TEST what I mentioned above you will end to one conclusion that Islam is the best way for all Man Kind!
May Allah (swt) guide us all!
Peace