To quote from one of my favorite movies: "I don't think that means what you think it means."
"To fulfill the law" is NOT synonymous with either "to uphold" or "to keep" the law. What Jesus did in fulfilling the law was to bring it to completion. Well, if you've fulfill the contract on your car and completed making payments, do you keep making payments? If you've completed painting the house do you keep painting it? If Jesus fulfilled the covenant promises made in the Law that Israel shall be a light to the nations by being lifted up on the cross so that salvation is offered not just to the Jews, but to all people who like Abraham come to God in faith, then what purpose is their for continuing to keep doing things that are no longer necessary -- and for those who are non-Jews, never were necessary.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so,
he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.” (Mathew 5:17-20)
In other words there is no heaven for you unless you are better than the Jew and you cant be better than the jews by not keeping the Laws and the commandment the first of which is broken by the trinity
"God" Came For The Jews Only: "But he answered and said, I am not sent but
unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Matthew, 15:24)
Where the american anglo saxon there in Israel 2000 years ago ?
Racial Discrimination of "God": "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and
commanded them, saying,
Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any
city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the
house of Israel." (Matthew, 10:5-6)
According to "God", The Gentiles Are Dogs: "It is not meet to take the
children's bread, and to cast it to dogs." (matthew, 15:26)
Amazingly, Paul went to such extremes that he claimed Jesus destroyed the Jewish Law!
“He (Jesus) brought the hostility to an end, by abolishing the Law of commandments with its regulations”. (Ephesians 2:14)
Needless to say, the passage contradicts Matthew 5:17-20 where Jesus specifically states that he came to preach the Law, not to destroy it.
Paul gave evidence that he was building a new religion, a complete deviation from Jesus’ teachings:
Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation: (Romans 15:20)
What is Paul implying here?
If Paul had been spreading the original teaching of Jesus, then “another man’s foundation” would have been the same as his. They would both have been involved in building the same structure. The people who were hearing about Jesus, or rather Christ, for the first time from Paul’s lips, had no means of comparing his account with that of the Apostles who still held to Jesus’ teaching. Paul’s version was the only one to which they had access.
Paul was developing a new religion under the doctrines he was fabricating