No, a better approach would be for you to support your claim.
NVM I'm not going to play this game.
No, a better approach would be for you to support your claim.
Atheist Internet warrioring in a nutshell: Fool the other guy into believing he bears the burden of proof, and that your epistemological doctrines are objective truths. If all else fails, demand proof of every premise and count on Gödel' Incompleteness Theorem.
I can't believe you guys fell for this. Based on the lack of context in the OP, it was pretty clear what Raymann's intentions were. 6 pages and counting. Raymann, continue enjoying your popcorn.
![]()
Is not an Atheist thing, actually I learned it from Muslims but it is universal at this point. I used to hate it when used against me.
See...not sincere at all
It is a waste of time to discuss anything with you. As long as you consider Divine guidance to be imaginary, you will never be able to understand our perspective.
If you really want to understand Islam and Muslims, you should first understand our Creator, the Sustainer of everything. Otherwise, we can show you the exit door.
He cannot be called a troll. A troll hides himself and misleads people to an idea which would not be expected from him. This user openly reveals himself as an Agnostic who is not compatible with Islam. I believe he is what he appears to be.
So Atheists have a monopoly on reason? Why didn't you tell us straight away? We could have saved much useless back-and-forth that way, you could simply straight up one-way tell us how it is.
No, a better approach would be for you to support your claim.
Islam is natural, axiomatic. Doesn't require an "explanation". Atheism is a construct, and thus, needs explaining.
The burden of proof is actually on you.
Try not to spasm.
Yes, depends on how you look at it. An Atheist in general is the one who doesn't believe God exists, an agnostic is not sure.
In both cases we are talking about belief and belief is subjective and doesn't require proof.
- - - Updated - - -
Correct me if I'm wrong but in very few words, your belief is based on the absence of a real answer. In other words if you cannot find the answer then God has to be the answer.
God doesn't need to be proven since is based on FAITH.
I'm not here to criticize your faith nor religion but it is what it is.
Wow, it's totally the opposite. You have a lot to learn. An atheist is always looking for proven answers unlike you (religious people)
Statistics show that most scientists are atheists and scientists are always looking to find and prove things.
No, we would think you're a weirdo.
Wrong. Scientists try to prove anything that is not proven yet.
Scientists would love to find the explanation of how everything happened, but there's no reliable evidence God was what started it all.
You cannot see, touch, hear or smell God.
It doesn't make sense.
Created complex dna for every single creature on earth but still cannot figure out a good method of communication between him and every single human being.
You would think he should be able to snap a finger and send a global e-mail updating rules as times change.
Or even better send telepathic messages to every human being.
I could think of a million reasons why God doesn't make sense but I don't want to bore you.
Absolutely not.
Tell you what?
When I tell you what I believe about something that cannot be proven I'm just giving you my personal opinion.
Science cannot prove that God exists but that doesn't mean God doesn't exist.
Do you understand that?
Science is pretty bad when dealing with the metaphysical world and that is understandable.
We welcome all attempts to prove God, even using non scientific methods.
In my personal opinion the popular religions have failed to come close to a reasonable explanation of God.
Again, is my personal opinion.
If I was God I could have think many better ways rather than send prophets, but that is just me.
Method 1. Very simple, using telepathy.
Wouldn't have been much more productive to send direct telepathic messages to every human being on earth?
Who would have doubt the existence of God if every single person received the same message at the same time?
Are you saying that the one that created all couldn't create a telepathic way of communication with all human beings?
Why don't you explain it in a concise and not boring manner, maybe I can learn something new today.
Sorry but that is exactly my claim. It doesn't make any sense. I know it cannot be proven by current scientific methods but I do believe in the metaphysical world so there has to be some other way to prove it.
I haven't come across any convincing one.
Why do you think Islam makes sense?
No, a better approach would be for you to support your claim.
It has nothing to do with sincerity, the "support your claim" technique is a widely used way of making the other person to open up first which is what you've been trying to do all along. So don't play victim now.
I already made it clear (page 7 on this thread) why Islam doesn't make sense, no need to keep repeating myself.
Read it and then if you feel like it explain why Islam makes sense to you.
To claim that the universe began to exist without a cause out of nothing is to argue for something that is both illogical and impossible.
Well, somewhere along the thread I also said I could find a million reasons why Islam doesn't make sense.So if I swipe the endless gibberish away...
it all boils down to the points we already had:
"God cannot be proven, so I do not believe. "and" Could God not find a better way to communicate then to send prophets?
"anything else? or did I miss anything?
Thanks for your post and explanation and although I admire your faith I still see no reason to believe.The beliefs of Islam are simple. Allah is one he has no partners whatsoever. He sends prophets to convey his message to mankind .....
Thanks for your post and explanation and although I admire your faith I still see no reason to believe.
Well, somewhere along the thread I also said I could find a million reasons why Islam doesn't make sense.
I also said I'm not here to impose my belief nor to adopt yours that's why I have been reluctant to go deep into the subject.
You hinted you could explain it as you've done in the past but you seem hesitant and afraid of wasting your time.
I don't blame you, I cannot promise you, your arguments would convince me.
Well, somewhere along the thread I also said I could find a million reasons why Islam doesn't make sense.
I also said I'm not here to impose my belief nor to adopt yours that's why I have been reluctant to go deep into the subject.
You hinted you could explain it as you've done in the past but you seem hesitant and afraid of wasting your time.
I don't blame you, I cannot promise you, your arguments would convince me.
Thanks for your post and explanation and although I admire your faith I still see no reason to believe.
I should write a formal article about free speech.
Here it is:
http://www.mikraite.org/Freedom-of-Speech-tt1915.html
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 100%, align: center"]
[TR][TD]Mikraite - Freedom of Speech | Threaded View
...[/TD][/TR][/TABLE]
Yes. Saying something that is wrong should not be prohibited for the reasons I explained.''Hate speech should be protected under free speech. If someone hates a race or religion or even God, he should be free to say so.''
So this is your free speech....?
Read your blog again and think what you have written...Yes. Saying something that is wrong should not be prohibited for the reasons I explained.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.