Israel and the annihilation of Palestine

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think rather than listen to strange unaccredited people off the net called "Ali Sina and Ibn Warraq" whose identities nor their "status" as apostates can be verified, We would be much better off reading what some famous people in the past have had to say about Mohammed(s)

Gibbon in 'The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' 1823
The good sense of Muhammad despised the pomp of royalty. The Apostle of God submitted to the menial offices of the family; he kindled the fire; swept the floor; milked the ewes; and mended with his own hands his shoes and garments. Disdaining the penance and merit of a hermit, he observed without effort of vanity the abstemious diet of an Arab.

Mahatma Gandhi, statement published in 'Young India,'1924.
I wanted to know the best of the life of one who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind.... I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume (of the Prophet's biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of that great life.

Michael Hart in 'The 100, A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons In History,' New York, 1978.
My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the secular and religious level. ...It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. ...It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.

Napolean Bonaparte as Quoted in Cherfils, ‘Bonaparte et Islam,’ Paris, France, pp. 105, 125.
"Moses has revealed the existence of God to his nation. Jesus Christ to the Roman world, Muhammad to the old continent...
"Arabia was idolatrous when, six centuries after Jesus, Muhammad introduced the worship of the God of Abraham, of Ishmael, of Moses, and Jesus. The Ariyans and some other sects had disturbed the tranquility of the east by agitating the question of the nature of the Father, the son, and the Holy Ghost. Muhammad declared that there was none but one God who had no father, no son and that the trinity imported the idea of idolatry...

"I hope the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men of all the countries and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of Qur'an which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness."

Sir George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.
"If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam."
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity."

"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today."
 
the muslims are weak ...
do u think or see those palestinians with weapons?? if they do: do they even compare with those of the Jews (which they happen to receive from america?)
so does it make sense for the jews to win? YES
theyve got it all weapons soldiers and power

and most imp.THEY GOT AMERICAS AID...!!!
the palestinians dont have any of the muslims or arab countries aid!!!!
so common sense which is not so common says that the jews win

its not because god forgot us he will never but we forgot him and we have weakened in ur faith and so we are getting wat we deserve,...

Salam
we Muslims have a burden on our shoulders, we have a message to mankind.
We have become astray. And when that happens do you think that we will be victorious. no. not until we go back to the prophets(pbuh) way.
As we all know that know can harm any one only with Allah's permission.
And we have been harmed because we don't follow our Prophets way. Ex battle of Uhud.Ex battle of Hunayn. Numbers don't matter to Allah.Its the Iman. Insh'Allah this will all change, and we'll be the ones to take the Ummah up again.
 
Last edited:
He taught with his example, he performed miracles, he died and he rose from the dead. The people around him were so impressed by what they had seen that they began teaching his message. Only YEARS after his death would some of them put in writing what they had seen and heard.

Yes, He did perform miracles, but by the will of who??? As He Himself said, "...on my own I can do nothing." He told them it is only through GOD'S will he performs them. Funny how you all forget that little part. When did He die exactly? We know for sure it wasn't on the "third" day. How?? When He went to His disciples He was HUMAN....not dead. He tells them, he's not a spirit as a spirit doesn't have skin and bones as he has. A spirit doesn't eat, yet, He ate. Read your bible more carefully, it clearly describes a spiritual being compared to a mortal being. He was DEFINITELY mortal!! Do you know who wrote the books contained in the Bible?? If you made that discovery, you might want to inform your Biblical Scholars, because they don't know. None of the disciples were witnesses to His "crucifixion". They all left Him. Not ONE word was written in His lifetime...not ONE. When 3 people see an event, do you get the exact same description...word for word?? Explain how that happens in the bible. Why does John differ so drastically from the Synoptics? Could it be because the author NEVER knew Jesus, pbuh? Was NEVER taught by Jesus, pbuh? But, was taught by a self-appointed apostle, Paul. Paul changed the teachings of Jesus, pbuh, but you accept it, why? Who gave him that authority?

Prophet Muhammed, pbuh, wanted power? What power did He have? He lived in poverty, but could have been rich beyond imagination. He could have destroyed and ruled countries, but never did. Why do you suppose He was named the most influential man in history. Where did Jesus, pbuh, rank? Fourth, after...guess who?? The founder of your Christianity....Paul!!

Neither Jesus nor Muhammed, pbut, claimed divinity at anytime! They both stated everything they taught came from God. YOU gave Jesus, pbuh, the title of a divine being through the writings of Paul.

You want to speak of trickery....look no further than Paul!!! He has fooled you into believing HIS teaching while dismissing the word of God that was taught by Jesus, pbuh.

I strongly suggest, if you want to learn the truth, you remove your blinders and actually read the bible and read the Qur'an with an open mind for both and with understanding.

And please don't come here as a wolf in sheep's clothing. You are attacking our Prophet, pbuh, by making slanderous comments about Him, and in the next breath saying it's not your intent. We are not a group of fools here and can see clearly what you are doing. If you want to make a claim....do as Muslims do....show respect and bring your proof!

Hana
 
Last edited:
abdul Majid
i think ur really pushing ur islamic belief into other ppls faces obvisiouly if ppl are christians they believe in jesus and if they are jewish they believe in moses so plz stop being sarcastic and acting liike ur so right have an open mind...
even though im muslim ur wrds are somewhat offensive...
thank u
 
Uhh Can You Quote Me Sister?? I Dont Appreiate You Saying That Im Forcen Anything....becuz I Dont, I Just Say The Truth?? Why Are You Offended By That?? ANYWAY LETS STICK TO THE TOPIC
 
Last edited:
lol....you said Mohamed (pbh) wanted power???

Then you know nothing about him(pbh)....he had power, and he preformed many mircles, including the quran, buddy !!!
He never used a trick , as you say ok!!!

And what was Jesus's mesage(pbh)?? he preformed miricles just as Prophet MOhamed(pbh), and people started worshiping him, becuase they dont understand that GOD gave him this power, to show them hes just not any regular guy and hes a massenger..duhhhh, they never understood, PAUL IS THE ONE WHO STARTED WORSHIPING JESUS(PBH), THATS HOW THIS NOTION OF HIM BEING GOD OR THE SON OF GOD STARTED.....

HE NEVER SAID HE WAS GOD OR THE SON OF GOD!!!!!!!
HE ALWAYS SAID HE WAS A PLAIN MASSENGERRRRRRRR

abdul Majid
i agree with u on this one our prophet moahmed peace b upon him did not want power and if u read his history he never became a ruler just a guide to muslims life...

christians and jews need to make sure u are reading from trusted sources...
 
To abdul Majid,

You are touching on an important point. The concept of Holy Scripture for Christians and Muslims is different.

When Jesus was alive he never did what Muhammed would later do. He never stood up and said "Silence, I am receiving a message from God and it says that you have to obey me". Jesus never gave us a "recitation". He taught with his example, he performed miracles, he died and he rose from the dead. The people around him were so impressed by what they had seen that they began teaching his message. Only YEARS after his death would some of them put in writing what they had seen and heard. And they never claimed that it was a "recitation from God". It was simply their story about all the wonders they had seen. It was exactly what you would do if you had met an incredible person and you wanted to leave something written for others to know about him. It was natural.

Muhammed did something very different, because he wanted power during his own life. He wouldn't wait to be dead before being recognized as a prophet. That is why he invented the idea of the "recitation from above", because it gave him an opportunity to use that trick whenever he wanted his followers to do something. Whenever he encountered a problem, the angel came with the best solution for HIM.

Please listen to what I am saying. Go and get more information from the websites of Ibn Warraq and Ali Sina. I don't know you but believe me, I only want the best for you.


lol .....sister i think you misunderstood me
i was talking to my friend turin,
about him sayin that ...""Muhammed did something very different, because he wanted power during his own life."'

so i responded he didnt want power, he wasnt doing this for himself...do you agree sister??

p.s never said he was a ruler
 
On the contorary - Prophet Mohammed(s) was the Khalifa and the Prophet of the Muslims. Therefore he was indeed the ruler of the Kaliphate and the leader of the Muslims :)

However he never seeked power
 
abdul Majid
i think ur really pushing ur islamic belief into other ppls faces obvisiouly if ppl are christians they believe in jesus and if they are jewish they believe in moses so plz stop being sarcastic and acting liike ur so right have an open mind...
even though im muslim ur wrds are somewhat offensive...
thank u

Salam Alaikum Sister:

Actually, I feel I have to speak up here. Brother Abdul was, and rightfully so, upset at the negative, inappropriate comment made about our Prophet, pbuh. This is an Islamic Forum, and although all are welcome to come learn, it should be done with respect. Referring to our Prophet, pbuh, as a trickster, is NOT appropriate and, quite frankly, it made me angry as well. If anyone should have their fingers slapped, it should have been Turin, not brother Abdul

This man is a Christian pushing his faith here by raising Jesus, pbuh, while calling Muhammed, pbuh, a liar (Trickster). This is not acceptable behaviour on an Islamic forum.

Allah, swt, knows best.

Wasalam
Hana
 
Last edited:
Salam
This I swear is the only issue. Once its fixed everything will go fine Insh'Allah.
The fact that we are not orginized.
The days are between us(people of the book). And we will see who will be victorious and who Jesus(PBUH) really was.
 
abdul Majid
i think ur really pushing ur islamic belief into other ppls faces obvisiouly if ppl are christians they believe in jesus and if they are jewish they believe in moses so plz stop being sarcastic and acting liike ur so right have an open mind...
even though im muslim ur wrds are somewhat offensive...
thank u
I appreciate your way of respect to others view hopefully it will increase among us all that will be heavenly. on one account I have to correct you. we jews don't believe in moses, our faith is towards G-d alone. moses is personage like others were, but he is no Deity to us. we don't pray to him.

ygalg
 
I think that izmi raises an interesting point. According to Muslims, every little thing that happens on this world is due to a direct decision by Allah. After all, the great "proof" that Muhammed offered his followers centuries ago was precisely the fact that he said he would win a battle because Allah was on his side and he actually won the battle. Everybody concluded that he was right, Allah was helping him.

What about today? It is clear that Muslims aren't winning battles any longer. Is there a point at which Muslims will have to conclude that they must be wrong since Allah is clearly not favoring them? After all Allah has to want the truth to prevail. If centuries pass and Muslims never again win a battle, isn't that proof that Islam is not what God really wants?

What would be the answer of a Muslim to this question? I am really interested. Thanks a lot.

You will find out here, why the Muslims are weak today, according to the Quran and Hadith:
http://www.islamicboard.com/world-affairs/15201-state-ummah-why-muslims-weak-today.html
 
ygalg
oo yes i know that u guys do not pray to prophet moses peace b uopn him but u follow his message and consider him to b the true prophet
just like muslims we worship god alone but we follow prophet mohammed (his teachings) peace b upon him...
we muslim though are a little different we believe, love, respect prophet jesus moses and mohamed peace b upon them and all 3 are mentioned in our quran with respect...:D
 
ygalg
oo yes i know that u guys do not pray to prophet moses peace b uopn him but u follow his message and consider him to b the true prophet
just like muslims we worship god alone but we follow prophet mohammed (his teachings) peace b upon him...
we muslim though are a little different we believe, love, respect prophet jesus moses and mohamed peace b upon them and all 3 are mentioned in our quran with respect...:D

Islam carries on the same message that Abraham brought. That of pure monotheism.

What Religion did Abraham follow? Islam of course, and here is why.
http://turntoislam.com/pages/dawah_video1/4_what_religion_did_abraham_follow.html
 
You will find out here, why the Muslims are weak today, according to the Quran and Hadith:
http://www.islamicboard.com/world-affairs/15201-state-ummah-why-muslims-weak-today.html

Thank you for posting this link. There is much wisdom expressed here. I particularly wish that our political "leaders" in America would pay attention to this observation:

"The ummah in this day and age has made this worldly life its primary pursuit and objective. For this reason they have become afraid of death and what it will bring. They love this worldly life they are immersed in, completely forgetting the importance of preparing for the Hereafter. This was one of the things that the Messenger of Allaah (saws) feared for his ummah.

'Abdullaah bin 'Amr bin al-'Aas (raa) narrated that the Prophet (saws) said: "If you conquer Persia and Rome, what type of people will you be?" 'Abdur-Rahmaan bin 'Awf replied: "We will say as Allaah has ordered us." He (saws) replied: "Or other than that. You will compete against one another, then you will envy one another, then you will plot against one another, and then you will hate one another. Following this you will go to the impoverished Muhaajireen and cause them to oppose one another." [Saheeh Muslim: 2962]

For this reason we see that when Persia was conquered, 'Umar bin Al-Khattaab (raa) began to weep and said: "No people were given this except that they began to fight one another."
 
To Hana_Aku,

I can assure you that it wasn't my intention to offend. But it is true that I don't think that Muhammad spoke the truth. You on the other hand say that Paul was the one who did the trickery and fooled us. Paul is a revered saint in my Church, so I could claim that you are now offending me. Why don't we call it even and keep looking for the truth which is after all the important thing?

We are left with two versions, so to speak, of the events that happened almost 2,000 years ago. I will explain them.

1) The version that Muslims believe is that Jesus was merely a prophet who had a message that was essentially identical to the message later given by Muhammad. But his followers distorted his message. In particular Paul lied completely about who Jesus was and what did he actually say. Then Muhammad came to give again to mankind the original message. I think I am right in all the essentials according to Muslim beliefs.

2) The version that Christians believe is that Jesus was much more than a prophet and that his followers never lied or betrayed his teachings. Paul in particular was truthful to his message and explained and developed it, always true to the essentials. Later Muhammad came and he lied when he said that the Christian Scriptures were corrupt and that he was bringing the original message as it stood before the corruption.

We are stuck there.

Muslims believe that Paul lied, and by saying so they offend Christians, who revere Paul. Christians believe that Muhammad lied, and by saying so they offend Muslims, who revere Muhammad. The problem is that Paul and Muhammad contradict each other completely so one of the two WAS lying.

As I said, we are stuck.

But wait a minute. I have an idea. Lets check how Paul and Muhammad lived. We will use the information given by their followers, to avoid any negative bias. According to their followers both were kind and generous, honest and humble, so we will not find a solution there. But there are differences.

According to Christians Paul lived the hazardous life of an itinerant preacher. After his conversion he was completely chaste and he lived in poverty. He was arrested several times by the Roman authorities and in fact spent many years in different prisons. He was harassed by the Pagan Romans, who still believed in their own gods. He was beaten several times by angry mobs and he finally was killed (martyred) in Rome.

According to Muslims Muhammad after Medina was a ruler who commanded armies. He led those armies in battle and asked for 20% of the booty for himself. He had 15 wives and perhaps 30 concubines, although the number is not certain. His will was law for the Arabs. He ordered those who opposed him to be killed. At the time of his death he was the absolute ruler of the peninsula and he had thousands of men ready to die for him.

As I said earlier, we know that one of the two was lying but we don’t know who. You know men as well as I do. Do men lie in order to get the life that Paul got? Do men lie in order to get the life that Muhammad got? We do not know who was lying but we can make a guess perhaps? Why would Paul lie? Why would Muhammad lie?

I will rest my case without saying anything else.
 
To Hana_Aku,

I can assure you that it wasn't my intention to offend. But it is true that I don't think that Muhammad spoke the truth. You on the other hand say that Paul was the one who did the trickery and fooled us. Paul is a revered saint in my Church, so I could claim that you are now offending me. Why don't we call it even and keep looking for the truth which is after all the important thing?

We are left with two versions, so to speak, of the events that happened almost 2,000 years ago. I will explain them.

1) The version that Muslims believe is that Jesus was merely a prophet who had a message that was essentially identical to the message later given by Muhammad. But his followers distorted his message. In particular Paul lied completely about who Jesus was and what did he actually say. Then Muhammad came to give again to mankind the original message. I think I am right in all the essentials according to Muslim beliefs.

2) The version that Christians believe is that Jesus was much more than a prophet and that his followers never lied or betrayed his teachings. Paul in particular was truthful to his message and explained and developed it, always true to the essentials. Later Muhammad came and he lied when he said that the Christian Scriptures were corrupt and that he was bringing the original message as it stood before the corruption.

We are stuck there.

Muslims believe that Paul lied, and by saying so they offend Christians, who revere Paul. Christians believe that Muhammad lied, and by saying so they offend Muslims, who revere Muhammad. The problem is that Paul and Muhammad contradict each other completely so one of the two WAS lying.

As I said, we are stuck.

But wait a minute. I have an idea. Lets check how Paul and Muhammad lived. We will use the information given by their followers, to avoid any negative bias. According to their followers both were kind and generous, honest and humble, so we will not find a solution there. But there are differences.

According to Christians Paul lived the hazardous life of an itinerant preacher. After his conversion he was completely chaste and he lived in poverty. He was arrested several times by the Roman authorities and in fact spent many years in different prisons. He was harassed by the Pagan Romans, who still believed in their own gods. He was beaten several times by angry mobs and he finally was killed (martyred) in Rome.

According to Muslims Muhammad after Medina was a ruler who commanded armies. He led those armies in battle and asked for 20% of the booty for himself. He had 15 wives and perhaps 30 concubines, although the number is not certain. His will was law for the Arabs. He ordered those who opposed him to be killed. At the time of his death he was the absolute ruler of the peninsula and he had thousands of men ready to die for him.

As I said earlier, we know that one of the two was lying but we don’t know who. You know men as well as I do. Do men lie in order to get the life that Paul got? Do men lie in order to get the life that Muhammad got? We do not know who was lying but we can make a guess perhaps? Why would Paul lie? Why would Muhammad lie?

I will rest my case without saying anything else.


Salam
Before Mohamad(PBUH) recieved any revelation, he was well known as an honest man. A man that never tells lies. And why would Mohamad(PBUH) lie. Do you know what his life was like, do you know how he treated people. Well his life was a complete struggle. You could never imagine how much torment he went through from his own people who rejected the message because they wanted to keep their status and money.

Did you ever read the Quran, or the biography of Mohamad(PBUH).
These days they talk about democracy and parties of different ideas.
Well in Madina that was the setting. The were parties, and those who opposed were not killed as you said. I am not saying this in defencive, but rather this is the truth.

And the prophet Mohamad(PBUH) was sent a mercy to the world. Not to Muslims only.
Why don't you read the Quran, you will really get a bigger picture.
Try it!..
 
Turin:

I will rest my case without saying anything else.

You can rest your case if you want, but I missed this post and I have a lot to say. :giggling: I will apologize ahead of time for the length of this post. :rollseyes

You on the other hand say that Paul was the one who did the trickery and fooled us. Paul is a revered saint in my Church, so I could claim that you are now offending me. Why don't we call it even and keep looking for the truth which is after all the important thing?

I apologize if I offended you. But, Paul said those things about himself, so it shouldn’t offend you.

Corinthians 9:19-21: “Although I am free from everyone, I have enslaved myself to all of them in order to win a large number. To Jews I behave as a Jew to win Jews; to those under the Law as one who is under the Law, although I am not under the Law, to gain those who are under the Law. To those who are without the Law I am as without Law, although not lawless towards God but committed to Christ’s Law, in order to win those who are without law.”

Paul abolished the Law, which was followed and preached by Jesus, pbuh, and corrupted the whole religion, giving it a new form. The main ambition behind all this was, in his own words, “to win a larger number” of followers; the followers of a new religion; the “Pauline Christianity”.
1) The version that Muslims believe is that Jesus was merely a prophet who had a message that was essentially identical to the message later given by Muhammad. But his followers distorted his message. In particular Paul lied completely about who Jesus was and what did he actually say. Then Muhammad came to give again to mankind the original message. I think I am right in all the essentials according to Muslim beliefs.
There is no such thing as “merely” a prophet. These were great, pious men, chosen by God to spread His word. Jesus, pbuh, didn’t say anything that wasn’t already said by all the prophets before Him. He preached the Oneness of God, to his particular nation as they all did. When men destroyed the original words of Jesus, pbuh, (not only Paul…although he changed the face of Christianity completely), Muhammed, pbuh, was sent to ALL mankind with the final revelation. And, He taught the same as the prophets before Him….The Oneness of God and the only one worthy of worship.

2) The version that Christians believe is that Jesus was much more than a prophet and that his followers never lied or betrayed his teachings.
Paul in particular was truthful to his message and explained and developed it, always true to the essentials.
Later Muhammad came and he lied when he said that the Christian Scriptures were corrupt and that he was bringing the original message as it stood before the corruption.

Paul knew people would not readily accept “his” Gospel so he warned the Galatians in 1:8, not to follow anything else except what he taught. (Imagine, a man not even taught by Jesus, pbuh, making such a statement.) Let’s see Paul’s gospel compared to the Gospel of Jesus, pbuh, and the revelation given to Muhammed, pbuh.

Original Sin:

Jesus: Not taught, Mark 19:13-14, Ezekiel 18:20-21
Muhammed: Not taught, Quran 6:164
Paul: Taught, Romans 5:12-14, Corinthians 15:22

Are we all unrighteous?

Jesus: NO, Mark 2:16-17, Mark 15:24
Muhammed: NO, Qur’an 33:70-71, 38:82-83
Paul: YES, Romans 3:10-23

Do our good works have any bearing before God?

Jesus: YES, Mat. 15:16, John 10:24-25
Muhammed: YES, Qur’an 24:38, 42:23
Paul: NO, Ephesians 2:8-9, Galatians 3:6-14

Must we follow the laws and commandments of God?

Jesus: YES, Matt 19:17, mark 10:19, Luke 18:20, Psalms 112:1, Exodus 20:6
Muhammed, YES, Qur’an 6:151-153
Paul, NO, Galatians 2:16, 3:11, 3:24, Romans 2:13

Is Atonement through sacrifice necessary?

Jesus: NO, Mark 12:28-29, Matt. 9:13, Hosea 6:6
Muhammed: NO, Qur’an 3:77
Paul: YES, Ephesians 5:2, Galatians 3:13, Hebrews 9:26

(by Ali Ataie)

Hmmmmm, who was it that lied???

The problem is that Paul and Muhammad contradict each other completely so one of the two WAS lying.

Of course they contradict. Paul contradicted all the prophets. To see which one was lying….see above.

According to Christians Paul lived the hazardous life of an itinerant preacher. After his conversion he was completely chaste and he lived in poverty.
With all the lying he was doing to all the different types of believers, is it any wonder he was a ‘wanted’ man living in poverty??

He was arrested several times by the Roman authorities and in fact spent many years in different prisons.
Hmmmm, a criminal.

He was harassed by the Pagan Romans, who still believed in their own gods. He was beaten several times by angry mobs and he finally was killed (martyred) in Rome.
Probably because the people realized all the lies he was telling them and because he played them all like a fiddle.

According to Muslims Muhammad after Medina was a ruler who commanded armies.
Yes, He was a great leader, Alhamdulillah.

He led those armies in battle and asked for 20% of the booty for himself
Check your resources, He never kept the booty for His own personal use. Muhammed, pbuh, lived in poverty by choice.

He had 15 wives and perhaps 30 concubines, although the number is not certain.

The number is 13: Khadija Bint Khuwailid (the only wife for 25 years), Sawda Bint Zam`a, `A´isha Bint Abu Bakr, Hafsa Bint `Umar, Zainab Bint Khuzaima, Ummu Salama, Zainab Bint Jahsh, Juwairiyya Bint al-Harith, Safiyya Bint Huyay, Ummu Habiba, Maria, the Copt, Maimuna Bint al-Harith, Rayhana

As for your “perhaps 30 concubines”, give me facts, not “perhapses”, from reliable, authentic sources.

His will was law for the Arabs. He ordered those who opposed him to be killed. At the time of his death he was the absolute ruler of the peninsula and he had thousands of men ready to die for him.

His TEACHINGS were for ALL mankind, not just Arabs. He NEVER forced anyone to embrace Islam. Islam was not spread by the sword. There is NO compulsion in religion. If that were true, why are so many Coptic Christians living in Egypt today when Egypt, for the vast majority of Islamic history, was ruled by Muslims? They would have been wiped out by now. Which Muslim army invaded Indonesia….the country with the largest percentage of Muslim population.

Yes, as I said, Prophet Muhammed, pbuh, was a GREAT leader, so much so, that Times named Him the most influential man in History. :) Yes, He was loved and respected by many over the entire peninsula and yes, they were willing to protect the Prophet and Muslim leader. He endured much through His years and always remained strong in His love and worship of Allah, swt. Regardless of hardship, He endured, He thanked God for ALL things, both good and bad, He was compassionate, pious, kind, caring, giving, etc., towards ALL people. Alhamdulillah. He spent His life as a servant to Allah, swt, and never faltered or questioned the will of Allah, swt. He was the BEST of all Muslims and a man whose guidance we can follow and strive to be like Him. (PBUH)

As I said earlier, we know that one of the two was lying but we don’t know who. You know men as well as I do. Do men lie in order to get the life that Paul got? Do men lie in order to get the life that Muhammad got? We do not know who was lying but we can make a guess perhaps? Why would Paul lie? Why would Muhammad lie?

I think you can answer that for yourself now. :)

Hana
 
I appreciate your way of respect to others view hopefully it will increase among us all that will be heavenly. on one account I have to correct you. we jews don't believe in moses, our faith is towards G-d alone. moses is personage like others were, but he is no Deity to us. we don't pray to him.

ygalg

Salam
Thats quiet obvious. She rather meant to say that you believe he came before. Not believe in him as a god.
 
To anis_z24

But I have read the Quran! I would never criticize it without reading it. Well, in reality I have never read it cover to cover, but I have read the most interesting pieces and probably all in all over 50% of the whole. I haven’t read more because for a non-Muslim it is really a very tiresome reading. I promise you I don’t say this in a spirit of disparaging it. If you take a non-Muslim, even an intellectually curious one, and you give it to him he will probably tire fairly soon especially because of the lack of a chronological or thematic plan. But I am digressing.

Regarding the fact that nobody was killed, I will mention the following: Kab ibn al-Ashraf, the Jews of Khaybar, the Banu Qurayza. See, I have read on the subject...;)

So, you see, there were people killed back then for thinking differently and there are people killed right know for thinking differently. For instance, at this very moment, Sunnis and Shias are killing each other for their differences in Iraq.

That is my problem. I see a cause and an effect. Of course I see much that was good in your prophet, but I also see things that were not so good. And those things are also having effects even now. That is why I recommend my Muslim brothers (because we are all brothers under the same God) to review the spiritual choices they have made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top