Quoting from one of my posts on another thread, "You obviously came here with a lot of preconceived ideas about Islam that apparently were derived from Christian sources that have striven to 'dig up dirt' on and to slander Islam."
You can probably tell from my 'testimony' that 9/11 led to a lot of soul searching on my behalf to decide if I wanted to continue on my chosen path. I did not and still do not support those who were the perpetrators of this event nor have I ever met a single Muslim who said it was justified or who was happy that the Twin Towers collapsed killing 3,000 innocent people. If you care to read it, here is the speech that I gave to in a local synagogue on the 10th anniversary of this tragic day (10 Years after the Most Traumatic Day in American History)
http://www.islamicboard.com/world-a...aumatic-day-american-history.html#post1462739
What you probably don't realize is that along with that soul searching I have also studied a lot about the details of that tragic day, perhaps more than anyother person on this forum. I am not an engineer or an architect, but these people are:
http://www.ae911truth.org/ I came across this site as a result of my studies on 9/11. This and other sites present evidences that are not congruent with plane-induced collapse:
Evidence of explosive top-down destruction of WTC1 & 2
1. High technology explosive, nanothermite, in WTC dust
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm
2. Iron-rich microspheres (signature thermite residue) in WTC dust documented by the US Geological Survey and RJ LeeGroup
3. Small human bone fragments on roof of 41 story Deutsche Bank
4. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete and steel inpyroclastic-like cloud
5. 1,200 ft debris field and no pancaked floors
Evidence of implosive destruction of 47-story WTC7 not hit by a plane
1. Symmetrical collapse at free-fall acceleration – support beams not there
2. Video indistinguishable from video of known implosions
3. Foreknowledge with media stating it had collapsed with live picture ofit standing in background
Now, there may be some logical explanation for these evidences and points, but, if they are true and not fabricated, then the 9/11 picture is a lot more complex than just ’19 Muslim terrorists with box-cutters’. Could the questions implicated here also raise possible doubts about the veracity of other acts of ‘Islamic terrorism’ including the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing.