Mom Beats Man With Baseball Bat For Allegedly Molesting Her Sons

[جوري]

I believe the perpetrator actually got away with his crime because of them!
They're keen on crying about 'barbarism' but what happened to her isn't barbaric it's perfectly civilized for a beautiful young woman to go through life with a mangled face and blind in one eye her attacker should receive a mini hotel room prison with mini bar and three square meals a day plus health care which even the hard working poor aren't entitled to!
As I said until those hypocrites experience injustice first hand will they've a change of venue!

 

[observer]

I believe the perpetrator actually got away with his crime because of them!
They're keen on crying about 'barbarism' but what happened to her isn't barbaric it's perfectly civilized for a beautiful young woman to go through life with a mangled face and blind in one eye her attacker should receive a mini hotel room prison with mini bar and three square meals a day plus health care which even the hard working poor aren't entitled to!
As I said until those hypocrites experience injustice first hand will they've a change of venue!

The crime was barbaric. Does that mean the sentence should be too? 2 wrongs equals 1 right? Really?

 

[جوري]

The crime was barbaric. Does that mean the sentence should be too? 2 wrongs equals 1 right? Really?

the sentence rights what's wrong - unfortunately no such luck in this case!
It isn't your call anyway or 'humans rights' if anyone should have a say it's the victim and not under duress by people like you or 'humans rights' you just peddle recycled empty rhetoric that's utterly nonsensical.
How's justice a second wrong - one truly marvels at the machination of your mind!

Best,

 

[observer]

It isn't your call anyway or 'humans rights' if anyone should have a say it's the victim and not under duress by people like you or 'humans rights'

Yep, all defendants should set the punishments. Great idea, no room for any problems there. No siree.

How's justice a second wrong - one truly marvels at the machination of your mind!

It's just that your concept of "justice" seems to be a pretty bloodthirsty and vengeful one. I wouldn't call that "justice" but revenge. They're different. One is constructive, the other wholly destructive.

 

[جوري]

Yep, all defendants should set the punishments. Great idea, no room for any problems there. No siree.

Even a better idea when they consult you or 12 idiots from the street who've no insight to the case- what a hoot!

It's just that your concept of "justice" seems to be a pretty bloodthirsty and vengeful one. I wouldn't call that "justice" but revenge. They're different. One is constructive, the other wholly destructive.

It's not my concept. It's derived from the crime itself!
Can't do the punishment don't do the crime - it's quite simple!

Best,

 

[observer]

Even a better idea when they consult you or 12 idiots from the street who've no insight to the case- what a hoot!

But the jury don't choose a punishment of course, they just decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Punishment is set by the judge in accordance with the law.

 

[جوري]

But the jury don't choose a punishment of course, they just decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Punishment is set by the judge in accordance with the law.

They've no business deciding guilt or innocence either it's a judicial matter beginning to end and punishment should fit the crime!

Best,

 

[observer]

They've no business deciding guilt or innocence either it's a judicial matter beginning to end and punishment should fit the crime!

Well, I suppose that's down to personal taste. I like the jury system but I don't think it's good for all cases (complex fraud trials for example). I'm not sure what system would be better either.

 

[observer]

punishment should fit the crime!

I agree, but punishment should not be revenge.

 

[جوري]

I agree, but punishment should not be revenge.

These are terms concocted by criminals no one should take joy in either crime or punishment!
Justice should be swift befitting of crime & not dragging on at the expense of the tax payers or abusive of the emotions of the plaintiff.
Until then will we see psychos committing all sorts of heinous crimes and people with no trust in the system who will take matters into their own hands!
Can't have one without the other it's simple laws of physics!

 

[جوري]

Well, I suppose that's down to personal taste. I like the jury system but I don't think it's good for all cases (complex fraud trials for example). I'm not sure what system would be better either.

A system of the learned. A judicial system of sages who are studied in the law and have no big corporate interest on the side one where the judge runs on knowledge fear of God and a love of justice!
No one ever gets a jury of 'their peers' nor do those involved in the process pick individuals with highly scientific or judicial knowledge to sway the majority.
If you've ever sat for a jury selection then you'll see a pattern of those chosen!
It's actually quite comical with a tinge of tragic!

 

[Pygoscelis]

the sentence rights what's wrong

No it doesn't.

This is criminal law. Not civil or contract law. In cases such as this nothing can right what's wrong. You are not going to unscar her face or her mind simply by seeking vengeance. You are only going to do more harm, and if you do it vigilante style, you may be doing that harm to yet another innocent.

Sentences should be about public safety and deterence for the same guy or others doing the act (which may or may not mean killing the guy who did it), and possibly rehabilitation. It should never be about blood lust or vengeance.

 

[Pygoscelis]

A system of the learned. A judicial system of sages who are studied in the law and have no big corporate interest on the side one where the judge runs on knowledge fear of God and a love of justice!
No one ever gets a jury of 'their peers' nor do those involved in the process pick individuals with highly scientific or judicial knowledge to sway the majority.
If you've ever sat for a jury selection then you'll see a pattern of those chosen!
It's actually quite comical with a tinge of tragic!

I actually would tend to agree with this. But I'm not sure I trust these "sages" (judges) to be free of political, financial, or other influences. We need to have better transparency and accountability rules in place for them.

 

[جوري]

No it doesn't.

Yes it does!

This is criminal law. Not civil or contract law. In cases such as this nothing can right what's wrong. You are not going to unscar her face or her mind simply by seeking vengeance. You are only going to do more harm, and if you do it vigilante style, you may be doing that harm to yet another innocent.

It is a play on words you're going for. It is meaningless. It won't give her, her face back but anyone who thinks twice of ruining a young woman's life and face and causing her blindness will go around with the same fate!

Sentences should be about public safety and deterence for the same guy or others doing the act (which may or may not mean killing the guy who did it), and possibly rehabilitation. It should never be about blood lust or vengeance.

Sentence should be equal to the crime, there's no rehabilitation in any other sentence or any other form- you ought to read a little about the prison system and how rehabilitative it is. In fact it is not! most of them sit in there looking for the day to get out to do the same crap to someone else and end up back in prison having learned nothing & at the tax payers expense in fact with better privileges than many poor hard working people get!

 

[Karl]

That is just plain sick and revolting, this is the difference between those who love their kids and want to protect them and those void of any real feelings.



The hypocrites will cry and whine, especially the so called human "rights" activists. I feel like they should be the first one punished with the same crime so they can see the victim's side for once .

http://s24.postimg.org/r6imlalk5/bahrami.jpg

So being a maniac trying to kill some one with a baseball bat shows how much you love your "kids"? Maybe I should chase some one around the supermarket with a chainsaw if they bump their trolly into one of my "kids", to show how much I love them.

 

[جوري]

This was probably an instinctive reaction by this woman. Try coming near the young of any species and then come report your honest findings with us

Best,

 

[White Rose]

.........

 

[جوري]

I am not sure why people don't trust their instincts more- I think they need to repress that part of them because it doesn't seem rational!
I argue however that the zenith of rationality is illogical!
We have those feelings in us for a reason we've substituted reason for sophistry of words!

 

[islamica]

I am not sure why people don't trust their instincts more- I think they need to repress that part of them because it doesn't seem rational!
I argue however that the zenith of rationality is illogical!
We have those feelings in us for a reason we've substituted reason for sophistry of words!

if you have seen idocracy, that is where the western world is headed although i would think most are already there.

 

[جوري]

I haven't will check it out :ia: when have the time