Questions about Judaism answered by a Jew!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lavikor201
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 2K
  • Views Views 217K
Status
Not open for further replies.
cool!!! :statisfie
but is the tanya accepted by the orthodox?

Yes, it is a holy text according to Orthodox Judaism. In "Lessons in Tanya", volume 2 - Shaar Hayichud Vehaemunah we can go even further, when speaking about the oneness:

In chapter 1, in Shaar Hayichud Vehaemunah - it teaches:



דאורייתא וקודשא בריך הוא כולא חד

Why does it have the power to do so? — For (Cf. Zohar I, 24a; II, 60a.) “the Torah and the Holy One, blessed be He, are one.”​

I find the above passage very interesting, but at the same time utterly complicated and frustrating because I have so much trouble comprehending all of the allegorical ad metaphorical meaning in the passage.
 
Is it true that you cant become a Hebrew scholar until you know Arabic.?

Shalom,

I have never heard of such a thing, nor is it true.

Here's a question -

How can we know that the Torah today is authentic, and not corrupted by any way?

Check the front page of the thread for the reasons why Judaism holds that the Torah has never been corrupted.

I might as well just provide you with the link to the post though:

http://www.islamicboard.com/536968-post608.html

The one thing you should look into is the chains we have of sages who knew eachother and knew of the same Torah and would not have written the things they did in seforim, commentaries, etc if they ever saw a change.
 
thanks rav for the response.

Now today I was on Virtual Yeshiva, and I was sort of half listening, half not lol. And I thought I heard the Rebbe say that there are 600,000 letters in Torah, each letter for the 600,000 men at Sinai I think. now is that true? If so.. wow.. That is amazing!!

Baruch H-shem!!
 
Yes, it is a holy text according to Orthodox Judaism. In "Lessons in Tanya", volume 2 - Shaar Hayichud Vehaemunah we can go even further, when speaking about the oneness:

In chapter 1, in Shaar Hayichud Vehaemunah - it teaches:



דאורייתא וקודשא בריך הוא כולא חד

Why does it have the power to do so? — For (Cf. Zohar I, 24a; II, 60a.) “the Torah and the Holy One, blessed be He, are one.”​

I find the above passage very interesting, but at the same time utterly complicated and frustrating because I have so much trouble comprehending all of the allegorical ad metaphorical meaning in the passage.

thanks! oddly enough, that passage makes sense to me, because there is nothing that is not g-d. if i'm way off, please correct.
 
thanks! oddly enough, that passage makes sense to me, because there is nothing that is not g-d. if i'm way off, please correct.

Well you are not a god, my friend. Everything is not G-d, but more of the essence and connection of G-d is everywhere so everything is united in that spirtual connection, and dependant on eachother, and in that kind of way one with G-d.

What is the religion of Abraham, Noah and Adam?

Abraham was the first Jew.
 
Well you are not a god, my friend. Everything is not G-d, but more of the essence and connection of G-d is everywhere so everything is united in that spirtual connection, and dependant on eachother, and in that kind of way one with G-d.



Abraham was the first Jew.

i phrased it wrong - what i meant was as you said above. yikes and khas vesholem! i know i'm not a g-d! :D i meant the essence of g-d is iin everything, including the torah. - this is not contrary to jewish thought or did i misunderstand completely? i think maybe i too, don't understand the wisdom of that quote after all and merely thought i did.
thanks.
 
i phrased it wrong - what i meant was as you said above. yikes and khas vesholem! i know i'm not a g-d! :D i meant the essence of g-d is iin everything, including the torah. - this is not contrary to jewish thought or did i misunderstand completely? i think maybe i too, don't understand the wisdom of that quote after all and merely thought i did.
thanks.

Its alright, you have an understanding of it, however no one can put it into words.

How about Adam and Noah?

They were not Jews. You can be a believer and follower of G-d without being Jewish my friend. Noah recieved the noahide laws which would be the laws that all of humanity would have to follow. Than beginning with Abraham, who claimed the right of his descendants to follow the 613 mitzvot, began the making of a people who would have to follow a greater amount of laws. You see as Rav Avigdor Miller zt”l phrased it in his Hashkafah related books like Awake my Glory, the entire world had a chance to claim the Torah and the mitzvot. Abraham claimed it first, so only his descendants would be able to claim such an honor. Than Isaac narrowed the field down… then Jacob… etc, which finally led to the Jewish people, and the receiving of the Torah after slavery in Egypt.

In other words, Noah and Adam were not Jews, but were followers of G-d.

Adam was the first human from whom all people descend. Being a creation of G-d's own "handiwork," he was obviously on a very elevated spiritual plane. Noah was also a righteous person and lived his life according to G-d's instructions. However, righteousness is not synonymous with Judaism. There were--and are--many righteous, upright people who are not Jewish.

Abraham was chosen by G-d to become the father of a new nation--the Jewish one. There are many reasons and explanations for this. Among others: a) Abraham realized the existence of G-d on his own, while living among idolaters who completely denied G-d's existence. Furthermore, Abraham did not keep this knowledge for himself, rather he spread it to anyone who would listen and influenced many people to acknowledge G-d. b) Abraham was the first person who was a actually ready to sacrifice his life for G-d (Mesirat Nefesh).
 
Beginning with Abraham, who claimed the right of his descendants to follow the 613 mitzvot, began the making of a people who would have to follow a greater amount of laws.


But am I right that these laws were not actually received until the time of Moses? What laws did Abraham have to follow?
 
There were--and are--many righteous, upright people who are not Jewish.

Are those non Jewish righteous people applicable to the Middle Eastern people only or all human beings.... how about Akhenaten, Confucius, Gauthama Buddha and Krishna? Are they righteous too?
 
Shalom (Peace),

But am I right that these laws were not actually received until the time of Moses? What laws did Abraham have to follow?

It would depend on who you ask. Some say Abraham followed Jewish law. I'm not sure where the sources are though, but I can tell you that I have heard such an opinion. I'm not sure if any of Abraham's actions in the Torah could be shown to be breaking Jewish law (Halakha). Either way; it depends how you define the term "Jew." "Jews" became a nation at Mt. Sinai, hundreds of years after Abraham. Before Mt. Sinai, commandments were not yet applicable being "Jewish" was by choice; someone who believed in the "Jewish G-d" was considered to be Jewish. Abraham was the first to believe in the “Jewish G-d” and is therefore considered to be the first Jew.

Abraham had two sons -- but only Isaac (and then his son Jacob) was considered Abraham's heir. See Genesis 17:19-21: "And G-d said, "Indeed, your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you shall name him Isaac, and I will establish My covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his seed after him. And regarding Ishmael, I have heard you; behold I have blessed him, and I will make him fruitful, and I will multiply him exceedingly; he will beget twelve princes, and I will make him into a great nation. But My covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you at this time next year." In the Bible, Abraham is always considered the first ancestor of the Jewish nation -- not Adam or Noah. He is therefore the first Jew.

A biblical example of this is Moredechai who is called a Jew even though he was from the tribe of Benjamin. (Scroll of Esther 2:5)

It is sort of like saying Columbus discovered America. When he discovered this land it wasn't called America; as a matter of fact Columbus who died in 1506 believed until his death that he discovered the colonized part of India. Nonetheless it is common to say that Columbus discovered America, because he discovered what we now call America.

In a similar sense, Abraham was the first of what we now call the Jewish People.


Are those non Jewish righteous people applicable to the Middle Eastern people only or all human beings.... how about Akhenaten, Confucius, Gauthama Buddha and Krishna? Are they righteous too?

You do not need to be any race to be considered righteous. Righteousness is defined by your actions.
 
It is sort of like saying Columbus discovered America. When he discovered this land it wasn't called America; as a matter of fact Columbus who died in 1506 believed until his death that he discovered the colonized part of India. Nonetheless it is common to say that Columbus discovered America, because he discovered what we now call America.

In a similar sense, Abraham was the first of what we now call the Jewish People.
Or, and pardon me for temporarily hijacking the thread, saying that the USA was born on the 4th of July. The USA came into being when our Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787. All that July 4th represents is a date attached to a piece of paper declaring an open rebellion. Even in success the former colonies didn't create the country we know now, but 13 separate countries joined together by Articles of Confederation that were written in the midst of a failing war effort in 1777, ratified in 1781, the war wasn't won till 1783, and the former colonies actually lived under those articles in their newfound independence till June 21, 1788 when they were replace by the U.S. Constitution. And the first government of the United States was not formed and in place till 1789; Washington was inaugurated our first president April 30, 1789. The only reason we look back on July 4 is because it was a bold pronouncement that ultimately panned out. If it had failed or the colonies had succeeded as independent states the whole concept of a nation being born in that rebellion would have never been remembered.

In other words, it is the present which controls our view of the past. And I guess that is about the only way my thoughts tie in to your comments in this thread. Sorry for the hijacking, if this wasn't July 5 I don't suppose those thoughts would be on my mind.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rav
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL HOW CAN ANY ONE discovered A LAND WHEN PEOPLE WERE ALREADY HERE ANYWAY WHO WAS CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS PLEASE NO WEBSITE LINK .


P.S, LET NOT START THE ANTI - B-S

Do you have anything intelligent to say, or do you just ramble on and on?

PS: Pretty good example Grace Seeker. I think that was a better analogy than what the askmoses team came up with.
 
shalom,
theoretical situation:
a jew in new jersey is planning to bomb a bus station and another jew finds out his plans.
should he go to to the (gentile) authorities and inform on him?
what would be the ruling on this?
thanks.
 
shalom,
theoretical situation:
a jew in new jersey is planning to bomb a bus station and another jew finds out his plans.
should he go to to the (gentile) authorities and inform on him?
what would be the ruling on this?
thanks.

Shalom,

Yes, a Jew must report the criminal. This ruling is held by: Rav Moses Feinstein, Rav Eliyahu Yosef Henkin, Rav Joseph Soloveitchik, and Rav Yoel Teitelbaum. The leading Rabbi's of our generation.

Sources
-Iggrot Moshe, Choshen Mishpat 2:62.
-Teshuvot Ibra 2:176.
-Nephesh haRav 267-69
-Dirvai Yoel 1:147.

Halacha states that Jews must follow the laws of the countries which host them during this period of exile (golus), as long as the goverment is not an anti-semetic goverment, or its laws contradict Jewish law.

Source
-Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 369:8.

As it is stated in Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 388:12, one must turn in a person who "makes the community suffer".
 
When Prophet Muhammad was chosen as the new leader of Medina, the Jews of Medina signed a treaty with the Muslims that as the citizens of Medina they would protect the city along with Muslims from invaders and enemies (esp. Pagans from Mecca).

In the Battle of Uhud, a Jewish rabbi named Al Mukhairiq decided to join the Muslim army to defend Medina from Meccans.

When he want to join the army, many Jews objected his attention and said to him that he can use the excuse that he cant go to the war as it's Sabbath.

He replied that he is a covenant of the treaty, and as a covenant he would fulfill his promise to defend Medina regardless that the war was on Sabbath. Furthermore, the war is to fight the idols-worshippers.

He died in that war. And the are unverified sources saying that Prophet Muhammad himself calling Al Mukhairiq a "martyr" (a very high status in Islam and would be rewarded paradise, inshallah)

The questions:

1) Does Al Mukhairiq did a righteous thing in accordance to Judaism?
2) Could a Jew join a war to defend his country on a Sabbath day?
3) Is that kind of covenant on being a citizen of Medina and willingly to defend Medina valid in Judaism?
4) Would Judaism regards him as a "martyr"?
5) And what Judaism thinks about those Jews who refused to defend Medina as they were not fulfilling their promises given in the treaty?
 
Last edited:
Here's a question...

>> How long would it take to read the meshrah Torah(sp?)(writing by rambam)
And, how long would it take to read the midsrhah?

I think i spelled both of those wrong. The first one is by Rambam, and the midshrah I am referring to is the book in the Talmud with 6 cetegories and then like 4-12 subcategories.

I plan on reading both of these, but do not know if I would have the time!
 
Re: Questions about Judaism awnsered by a Jew!

This is a great article I read on this topic....

Jews will go to heaven if they are good people, and follow G-d's law.
Non-Jews will go to heaven if they follow the 7 Laws of Noah. (Just 7 laws guys... you can do it!)

The afterlife is a fundamental of Jewish belief!

The creation of man testifies to the eternal life of the soul. The Torah says, "And the Almighty formed the man of dust from the ground, and He blew into his nostrils the SOUL of life" (Genesis 2:7). On this verse, the Zohar
states that "one who blows, blows from within himself," indicating that the soul is actually part of G-d's essence. Since G-d's essence is completely spiritual and non-physical, it is impossible that the soul should die. (The commentator Chizkuni says this why the verse calls it "soul of LIFE.")

That's what King Solomon meant when he wrote, "The dust will return to the ground as it was, and the spirit will return to G-d who gave it." (Ecclesiastes 12:17)

For anyone who believes in a just and caring G-d, the existence of an afterlife makes logical sense. Could it be this world is just a playground without consequences? Did Hitler get away with killing 6,000,000 Jews? No. There is obviously a place where good people receive reward and bad people get punished. (see Maimonides' 13 Principles of Faith) The question of "why do bad things happen to good people" has a lot to do with how we look at existence. The way we usually perceive things is like
this: A "good life" means that I make a comfortable living, I enjoy good health, and then I die peacefully at age 80. That's a good life. Anything else is "bad."

In a limited sense, that's true. But if we have a soul and there is such a thing as eternity, then that changes the picture entirely. Eighty years in the face of eternity is not such a big deal.

From Judaism's perspective, our eternal soul is as real as our thumb. This is the world of doing, and the "world to come" is where we experience the eternal reality of whatever we've become. Do you think after being responsible for the torture and deaths of millions of people, that Hitler could really "end it all" by just swallowing some poison? No. Ultimate justice is found in another dimension.

But the concept goes much deeper. From an eternal view, if the ultimate pleasure we're going after is transcendence - the eternal relationship with the Almighty Himself, then who would be luckier: Someone who lives an easy life with little connection to G-d, or someone who is born handicapped, and despite the challenges, develops a connection with G-d. Who would be
"luckier" in terms of eternal existence? All I'm trying to point out is that the rules of life start to look different from the point of view of eternity, as opposed to just the 70 or 80 years we have on earth.

So what is the afterlife exactly?

When a person dies and goes to heaven, the judgment is not arbitrary and externally imposed. Rather, the soul is shown two videotapes. The first video is called "This is Your Life!" Every decision and every thought, all the good deeds, and the embarrassing things a person did in private is all replayed without any embellishments. It's fully bared for all to see. That's why the next world is called Olam HaEmet - "the World of Truth," because
there we clearly recognize our personal strengths and shortcomings, and the true purpose of life. In short, Hell is not the Devil with a pitchfork stoking the fires.

The second video depicts how a person's life "could have been..." if the right choices had been made, if the opportunities were seized, if the potential was actualized. This video - the pain of squandered potential - is much more difficult to bear. But at the same time it purifies the soul as well. The pain creates regret which removes the barriers and enables the soul to completely connect to G-d.

Not all souls merit Gehenom. It is for people who have done good but need to be purified. A handful of people are too evil for Gehenom, and they are punished eternally. Pharaoh is one example.

So what about "heaven?"

Heaven is where the soul experiences the greatest possible pleasure - the feeling of closeness to G-d. Of course not all souls experience that to the same degree. It's like going to a symphony concert. Some tickets are front-row center; others are back in the bleachers. Where your seat is located is based on the merit of your good deeds - e.g. giving charity, caring for others, prayer.

A second factor in heaven is your understanding of the environment. Just like at the concert, a person can have great seats but no appreciation of what's going on. If a person spends their lifetime elevating the soul and becoming sensitive to spiritual realities (through Torah study), then that will translate into unimaginable pleasure in heaven. On the other hand, if
life was all about pizza and football, well, that can get pretty boring for eternity.

The existence of the afterlife is not stated explicitly in the Torah itself, because as human beings we have to focus on our task in this world. Though awareness of an eternal reward can also be an effective motivator.

For further study, see Maimonides' Foundations of the Torah, "The Way of G-d" by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzatto, and the commentary of Nachmanides to Leviticus 18:29.

http://judaism.about.com/library/3_askrabbi_o/bl_simmons_heavenhell.htm



To be born a Jew, your mother must be Jewish. If your father is Jewish and your Mother is not than your not a Jew. You can convert of course if you want to.

Many Tradtionlist Rabbi's will turn you away three times to see if this is something you really want. It takes an interview process and some time. It is a big thing to accept the covenent we made and follow a very hard line of laws.

Converts are honored more than regular Jews.

We are Jews because our ancestors saw G-d's might and might have been scared... Converts are Jews on full faith, not fear.

I understand that you believe there is only one all powerful God and Muslims and Christians will agree with that. I understand, however that Jews do not believe in Jesus. Muslims do and Christians do. Muslims believe he was a prophet. Do you believe that he was a prophet or teacher? Christians believe he is the son of God who came unto his own, but his own rejected him. Christians believe he is the only way to God because he died for our sins. Just like the the children of Israel had to sprinkle their door post for the passover, we Christians believe that we must have our spirits covered by the blood of the lamb of God (Jesus) to escape the judgments of G-d.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top