Questions about Judaism answered by a Jew!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lavikor201
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 2K
  • Views Views 217K
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would be interested just to see the video even if I could not understand it. I have a friend who does speak Swedish and Yiddish so maybe I'll ask him to translate if he would have the time, because I have no idea what this lady is talking about if she does indeed say it.

But anyway, she is pretty much wrong in what she said.
 
Okay, thank you. I see it is from an Islamic site, so could you tell me why it was posted on the site? Is it an attack on Judaism, or is it more educational? I'll try to get it translated, but I am not 100% positive I will be able to. Either way, hopefully the views of this women are not being spread around to be 'Jewish' and I think you can understand that all Muslims when they speak are not perfect representitives of the actual Islamic position on something.
 
It's certainly not an attack on Judaism, she doesn't even spend a lot of time talking about what she learned there. She became a Muslim and she brings a few things up about her developement as a person, and the things she learned from her Rabbi had an effect on her, that's why she brings it up at all.

and I think you can understand that all Muslims when they speak are not perfect representitives of the actual Islamic position on something.

Exactly, that's why I wanted to check with you in this thread.

If you want, I might be able to translate some of the relevant parts of the interview (she does mention some Hebrew phrases but I'll just provide the translation she gives in those cases).
 
"Unlike many of our fellow religion, we don't go out and mass convert people"

muslims also do not mass convert but i understand what you mean
 
Well I am a Jew and I have a thorough religious education. The post that initialised this thread is rife with errors but for brevity's sake i willnot discuss it. If anyone DOES have a question, please feel free to ask.

As for the aomn discussed here, tjhe supposed Jewish convert to Islam, she is fake. I have seen her nonsense on a few English and Arabic (my first language is Arabic) boards. She is a Jew hater, sad to say, but never a Jew because her words are totally incorrect even from a very basic understanding.
 
I was wondering, what are you taught about Christianity and Islam - 2 paths arguably of which were continuation of the ongoing message from God through his 124,000 Prophets (Moses Included). What basis do you not follow the teachings (at the time, not the present) of Jesus :RA:, and then further on, Mohamad :saw:
 
Well I am a Jew and I have a thorough religious education. The post that initialised this thread is rife with errors but for brevity's sake i willnot discuss it. If anyone DOES have a question, please feel free to ask.

As for the aomn discussed here, tjhe supposed Jewish convert to Islam, she is fake. I have seen her nonsense on a few English and Arabic (my first language is Arabic) boards. She is a Jew hater, sad to say, but never a Jew because her words are totally incorrect even from a very basic understanding.

Shalom,

Could you let me know any errors I may have written on questions I was asked about Judaism? Thanks in advance.

I was wondering, what are you taught about Christianity and Islam - 2 paths arguably of which were continuation of the ongoing message from God through his 124,000 Prophets (Moses Included). What basis do you not follow the teachings (at the time, not the present) of Jesus :RA:, and then further on, Mohamad :saw:

Jesus and Mohammad according to Judaism are either false prophets, or 'non-prophets'. Judaism really has no official opinion on them because our religion has existed before both of their births and they did not qualify according to standards set by the Hebrew Bible as prophets.

Therefore, there is no opinion on Jesus and Mohammad because they are irrelevant.
 
Hi
If you don't mind I have a question to. It's about the Thorah and the Old testament. In school (Catholic school :) ) I was always thought that the Old testimony from the bible says exactly the same as the Tanakh. But somehow I find that hard to believe, and I'm inclined to think that the OT is an interpretation of the Tanakh instead. Now my question, do you know of any Jewish scholars who have done some comparative study about this? Or do you know of any significant differences? For example in genesis in the Thorah. (I was told that's "B'res-hit", right?) Does it say God created man in his image?
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Hi
If you don't mind I have a question to. It's about the Thorah and the Old testament. In school (Catholic school :) ) I was always thought that the Old testimony from the bible says exactly the same as the Tanakh. But somehow I find that hard to believe, and I'm inclined to think that the OT is an interpretation of the Tanakh instead. Now my question, do you know of any Jewish scholars who have done some comparative study about this? Or do you know of any significant differences? For example in genesis in the Thorah. (I was told that's "B'res-hit", right?) Does it say God created man in his image?
Thanks in advance

Well first of all, I believe the "old testament" is translated from Greek, not the original Hebrew text, so therefore, there are bound to be flaws since the two languages are so different. But anyway, here is a list of all of the books of the Tanakh:

The Torah ("Teaching") [also known as the Pentateuch/Humash] consists of:

1. Genesis [בראשית / B're****]
2. Exodus [שמות / Sh'mot]
3. Leviticus [ויקרא / Vayiqra]
4. Numbers [במדבר / B'midbar]
5. Deuteronomy [דברים / D'varim]
The books of Nevi'im ("Prophets") are:

6. Joshua [יהושע / Y'hoshua]
7. Judges [שופטים / Shophtim]
8. Samuel (I & II) [שמואל / Sh'muel]
9. Kings (I & II) [מלכים / M'lakhim]
10. Isaiah [ישעיה / Y'shayahu]
11. Jeremiah [ירמיה / Yir'mi'yahu]
12. Ezekiel [יחזקאל / Y'khezqel]
13. The Twelve Minor Prophets [תרי עשר]
I. Hosea [הושע / Hoshea]
II. Joel [יואל / Yo'el]
III. Amos [עמוס / Amos]
IV. Obadiah [עובדיה / Ovadyah]
V. Jonah [יונה / Yonah]
VI. Micah [מיכה / Mikhah]
VII. Nahum [נחום / Nakhum]
VIII. Habakkuk [חבקוק /Khavaquq]
IX. Zephaniah [צפניה / Ts'phanyah]
X. Haggai [חגי / Khagai]
XI. Zechariah [זכריה / Z'kharyah]
XII. Malachi [מלאכי / Mal'akhi]
The Ketuvim ("Writings") are:

14. Psalms [תהלים / T'hilim]
15. Proverbs [משלי / Mishlei]
16. Job [איוב / Iyov]
17. Song of Songs [שיר השירים / Shir Hashirim]
18. Ruth [רות / Rut]
19. Lamentations [איכה / Eikhah]
20. Ecclesiastes [קהלת / Qohelet]
21. Esther [אסתר / Est(h)er]
22. Daniel [דניאל / Dani'el]
23. Ezra-Nehemiah [עזרא ונחמיה / Ezra wuNekhem'ya]
24. Chronicles (I & II) [דברי הימים / Divrey Hayamim]

The following are part of Christian traditions, but not Jewish ones:

  • Tobit
  • Judith
  • 1 Maccabees
  • 2 Maccabees
  • Wisdom (of Solomon)
  • Ben Sira
  • Baruch, includes Letter of Jeremiah (Additions to Jeremiah)
  • Additions to Daniel
  • Additions to Esther

Examples of Christian mistranslations in the Tanakh could be considered:

Isaiah 7:14:

Christian Version: Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.

Jewish Version:: Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

The word in question is: "ha'almah".

Anyone who understands basic hebrew, knows that the word means "young woman". The word for 'virgin' in hebrew is - "betulah".

To see the word "almah" meaning young woman look in the book of Proverbs where an adulterous woman is called an "almah":

There are three that are beyond me and a fourth that I do not know: the way of an eagle in the heavens; the way of a snake upon a rock; the way of a ship in the heart of the sea; and the way of a man with a young woman. Such is the way of the adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, "I have done no wrong. (Proverbs 30:18)

So this shows that the word does not mean virgin.

However, it might cross your mind to ask if Isaiah himself had the word that strictly meant "virgin" in his vocabulary? Was "almah" the only word he knew which could be used to refer to a virgin?

Isaiah 23:4 Be thou ashamed, O Zidon: for the sea hath spoken, [even] the strength of the sea, saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, [nor] bring up virgins. (KJV)

[23:12] And he said, Thou shalt no more rejoice, O thou oppressed virgin, daughter of Zidon: arise, pass over to Chittim; there also shalt thou have no rest. (KJV)

[37:22] This [is] the word which the LORD hath spoken concerning him; The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, [and] laughed thee to scorn; the daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee. (KJV)

[47:1] Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: [there is] no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate. (KJV)

[62:5] For [as] a young man marrieth a virgin, [so] shall thy sons marry thee: and [as] the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, [so] shall thy G-d rejoice over thee. (KJV)

(Source: Messiahtruth.com)​


Whenever we describe an emotion or an image of G-d, it is always metaphorical. An example I love to use is that when we say the computer "did not like" the software, we are not actually saying the computer "did not like it", but acted in a way that we intepret as such.
 
First of all thanks for taking the time to explain that much in depth.
One thing wasn't clear though.
Whenever we describe an emotion or an image of G-d, it is always metaphorical. An example I love to use is that when we say the computer "did not like" the software, we are not actually saying the computer "did not like it", but acted in a way that we intepret as such.
I'm a little confused by that answer :)
So you're saying the Jewish scriptures do say that God created in his image, but that this is commonly interpreted metaphorically?
 
Well first of all, I believe the "old testament" is translated from Greek, not the original Hebrew text, so therefore, there are bound to be flaws since the two languages are so different. But anyway, here is a list of all of the books of the Tanakh:



The following are part of Christian traditions, but not Jewish ones:

  • Tobit
  • Judith
  • 1 Maccabees
  • 2 Maccabees
  • Wisdom (of Solomon)
  • Ben Sira
  • Baruch, includes Letter of Jeremiah (Additions to Jeremiah)
  • Additions to Daniel
  • Additions to Esther

Examples of Christian mistranslations in the Tanakh could be considered:

Isaiah 7:14:

Christian Version: Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.

Jewish Version:: Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

The word in question is: "ha'almah".

Anyone who understands basic hebrew, knows that the word means "young woman". The word for 'virgin' in hebrew is - "betulah".

To see the word "almah" meaning young woman look in the book of Proverbs where an adulterous woman is called an "almah":

There are three that are beyond me and a fourth that I do not know: the way of an eagle in the heavens; the way of a snake upon a rock; the way of a ship in the heart of the sea; and the way of a man with a young woman. Such is the way of the adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, "I have done no wrong. (Proverbs 30:18)

So this shows that the word does not mean virgin.

However, it might cross your mind to ask if Isaiah himself had the word that strictly meant "virgin" in his vocabulary? Was "almah" the only word he knew which could be used to refer to a virgin?

Isaiah 23:4 Be thou ashamed, O Zidon: for the sea hath spoken, [even] the strength of the sea, saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, [nor] bring up virgins. (KJV)

[23:12] And he said, Thou shalt no more rejoice, O thou oppressed virgin, daughter of Zidon: arise, pass over to Chittim; there also shalt thou have no rest. (KJV)

[37:22] This [is] the word which the LORD hath spoken concerning him; The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, [and] laughed thee to scorn; the daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee. (KJV)

[47:1] Come down, and sit in the dust, O virgin daughter of Babylon, sit on the ground: [there is] no throne, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called tender and delicate. (KJV)

[62:5] For [as] a young man marrieth a virgin, [so] shall thy sons marry thee: and [as] the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, [so] shall thy G-d rejoice over thee. (KJV)

(Source: Messiahtruth.com)​


Whenever we describe an emotion or an image of G-d, it is always metaphorical. An example I love to use is that when we say the computer "did not like" the software, we are not actually saying the computer "did not like it", but acted in a way that we intepret as such.


Pardon me for as a Christian commenting on this post, but as some statements were made with regard to Christian traditions in them, I only wish to clarify somethings that may be misunderstood.

The Christian Old Testamet is indeed translated making use of the Greek translations that exist, but it is not translated from them. The standard text that is generally used in most modern translations of the Old Testament is the Masorectic text of the Tanakh, and where the translators have questions about the best translation of the Hebrew into English, then the ancient Greek translation is referred to as an additional source to inform the translator of what the original intent of the author was. In some of the older English version, such as the King James Version, there was more dependence on the Greek text than is true today.


The books listed as being part of Christian traditions but not Jewish ones are included in the Old Testament of the Catholic and Orthodpx Bibles, but not in Protestant Bibles. The reason is that Catholic and Orthodox Bibles were originally based on translations of the Jewish Tanakh into Greek back when Greek was the common language of most 1st century Christains. (I understand that those Greek translations of the Tanakh had been made by Jews, though perhaps that is disputed.) Those ancient Greek translations of the Old Testament, as it came to be called by Christians, did include the books Rav has mentioned above. However, centuries later when Luther translated the Bible into German he realized that the Jews did not consider those books which Rav listed above as part of the Tanakh and so he did not include them in his German translation of the Old Testament. Ever since, most Protestants translators of the Old Testament have followed suit with Luther's practice of only including in the Christian Old Testament those books that are part of the Hebrew Tanakh, though we do place them in a different order.

As Rav points out, there are still some differences in translation, that (to Christian's shame) may reflect the biases of the translators, the Isaiah passage cited being a key, but not the only, illustration of that.
 
Last edited:
Shalom,

Could you let me know any errors I may have written on questions I was asked about Judaism? Thanks in advance.



Jesus and Mohammad according to Judaism are either false prophets, or 'non-prophets'. Judaism really has no official opinion on them because our religion has existed before both of their births and they did not qualify according to standards set by the Hebrew Bible as prophets.

Therefore, there is no opinion on Jesus and Mohammad because they are irrelevant.

Surely there must be an opinion, basis as to why they was rejected, exactly how was the qualfication not met by the Hebrew bible?
 
First of all thanks for taking the time to explain that much in depth.
One thing wasn't clear though.

I'm a little confused by that answer :)
So you're saying the Jewish scriptures do say that God created in his image, but that this is commonly interpreted metaphorically?

These are some opinions that Rabbi Gil Student (@ Aishdas) quotes in his explanation of the phrase:

Rabbi Sa'adia Gaon, in his Emunot VeDeyot (2:9, ed. Kaffih pp. 88-89) claims that the phrase "G-d's image" only implies uniqueness, similar to (Jeremiah 2:7) "My land" and (Isaiah 14:25) "My mountains" [In his translation of the Torah, Rabbi Sa'adia Gaon offers a different explanation of this term].

Both Rabbi Shmuel Ben Meir (Rashbam) and Rabbi Avraham Ibn Ezra understand the word used for G-d, "Elokim", as referring here to angels, as it does in Judges (13:22). Thus, man was created in the image of angels.

Maimonides (Rambam) begins his Moreh Nevuchim by explaining this enigmatic phrase. He contends (1:1-2) that this refers to the human intellect, or rather the human intellectual process. Just like G-d, man can think and understand without any physical actions. This intellectual independence of thought is the "G-d's image" in which man was created [cf. Abarbanel, ibid., p. 67]. Rabbi Shimon Ben Tzemach Duran (Rashbatz) in his Magen Avot (3:18) follows this approach as does R. Yom Tov Lipman Heller (Tosafot Yom Tov, Avot 3:14).

Abarbanel also suggests that man's physical parts are representative of the world and of G-d's actions. R. Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (Ramchal) eloquently stated it thus (Da'at Tevunot, ed. Feldheim p. 115, ed. Friedlander ch. 80):

For, in relation to all of the exalted qualities which we distinguish in the Blessed One is His acting on the level of His creatures, we find corresponding qualities in the figure of man. For example: the eye of man corresponds to the eye of His providence, which exercises surveillance over all the dwellers of the earth to judge all of their deeds... The ears of man correspond to G-d's sitting and listening to the prayers of men and to all of their praises... The mouth of man corresponds to G-d's speaking in a vision to His prophets... And, similarly, all of the other components of the body can be well understood as paralleling in their form and function the qualities to which He resorted in the making of His creations.​

This understanding is also accepted by R. Natan Tzvi Finkel, the Alter of Slabodka, in his Or Hatzafun (vol. 1 p. 216).

Therefore, we do not believe that G-d actually has an image, or a form. I hope this helps.

Surely there must be an opinion, basis as to why they was rejected, exactly how was the qualfication not met by the Hebrew bible?

Of course there is a basis as to why they are not accepted as prophets. I can give you a few if you wish.

Why was Jesus not the Messiah?

  • First of all, he must be Jewish - "...you may appoint a king over you, whom the L-rd your G-d shall choose: one from among your brethren shall you set as king over you." (Deuteronomy 17:15)

  • He must be a member of the tribe of Judah - "The staff shall not depart from Judah, nor the sceptre from between his feet..." (Genesis 49:10)

    To be a member of the tribe of Judah, the person must have a biological father who is a member of the tribe of Judah.

  • He must be a direct male descendant of King David and King Solomon, his son - "And when your days (David) are fulfilled, and you shall sleep with your fathers, I will set up your seed after you, who shall issue from your bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will make firm the throne of his kingdom forever..." (2 Samuel 7:12 - 13)


    The genealogy of the New Testament is inconsistent. While it gives two accounts of the genealogy of Joseph, it states clearly that he is not the biological father of Jesus. One of the genealogies is through Nathan and not Solomon altogether!

  • He must gather the Jewish people from exile and return them to Israel -"And he shall set up a banner for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth." (Isaiah 11:12)

    Are all Jews living in Israel? Have all Jews EVER lived in Israel since the time of Jesus?

  • He must rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem - "...and I will set my sanctuary in their midst forever and my tabernacle shall be with them.." (Ezekiel 37:26 - 27)

    At last check, there is NO Temple in Jerusalem. And worse, it was shortly after Jesus died that the Temple was DESTROYED! Just the opposite of this prophecy!

  • He will rule at a time of world-wide peace - "...they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore." (Micah 4:3)

Since Mohammad claimed Jesus was the Messiah, this means that Mohammad is a false prophet as well, according to Judaism, since Jesus is not the Messiah.
 
Last edited:
Well I am a Jew and I have a thorough religious education. The post that initialised this thread is rife with errors but for brevity's sake i willnot discuss it. If anyone DOES have a question, please feel free to ask.

As for the aomn discussed here, tjhe supposed Jewish convert to Islam, she is fake. I have seen her nonsense on a few English and Arabic (my first language is Arabic) boards. She is a Jew hater, sad to say, but never a Jew because her words are totally incorrect even from a very basic understanding.

Is it THAT hard to believe that a Jewish person will revert to Islam?:rollseyes
 
:sl:

Maybe we should stop talking about Jewish people converted to Islam as it is off-topic.

It'll be a sad thing if this thread is being closed as everybody is getting "off topic".

Allah Ma'akom!
 
Hi. I have a question on the "documentary Hypothesis." Is this hypothesis accepted by most Jews? I ask such question because I read about some Reform Jews who were in support of it.
 
Ebist: Plenty of folks convert to Islam, and to other faiths. this woman however was never a Jew. She made very basic mistakes in terms of Jewish Religion and Culture. I actually confronted her in one of the English speaking forums she had posted on and she turned tail and siappeared. That is a fact.

One of our greatest sages , Nachamides, had a son who converted to Islam, Shabbatai also converted, and so on.

Rav: The Old Testament was written in Hebrew. All other languages are just translations and very often mistransalted badly. The first foreing language translation was the Septaguint undertaken by students of Philo in Alexandria. The language was Middle Greek. From Greek it was translated into Latin and then into various other tongues. The most widely read english version tyoday is from the King James Bible which itself is nothing more than the Wm. Tynsdale Bible.

MD: We are taught that both Christianity are blessed for their adherents but incorrect paths for true Jews.

Christianity is nothing more than, and I will quote Disraeli here, "The fufillment of Judaisim, or nothing at all." Jesus, if he even existed, was nothing more than a religious Jew. He said that his message was for the Jew, not the gentile. It was only after his alleged death that Saul of Tzarsus, Paul as he is known to Christains and others, began preaching to non-Jews. If anything, Christains should call themselves "Paulians" because that is the essence of their faith.

Until Nicea, Christains were more or less Jews with a slightly different minchag, or ritualisation. After Nicea the institution which would one day call itself the Roman Catholic Church began to distance itself as much a spossible from its Jewish parent.

Islam is different. Muhammed ( and I do not want to offend people here because I am sure we all know how sensitive people can get when their Prophet is discussed even in a cicuitously negative/critical way) was a man who tried to present himself as a Jewish prophet. In fact, it is said that he did not even understand that Judaisim and Christianity had diverged so that he saw it as one and the same.


Remember that initially salat faced Jerusalem. in the end, Muhammed also tried distancing this new faith (or in Muslim's view, abrogation of the one,true original faith)

AbuZ: Yes, she certainly did concoct her life story. She is worse than a liar. She is a hateful and divisive person. should a person have a strong personal faith that is grteat. however, when one feels the need to subjugate the faith of others, ther is a serious problem. It is akin to me claming to have been born Muslim but after finding out that Muslims have sex with boys, I converted to Judaisiam. It is terible, terible nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top