SOME of the ERRORS in the HOLY BIBLE

  • Thread starter Thread starter selma1
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 101
  • Views Views 21K
I think such thread does not do any benefit to anyone.

so true.

And once more I would like to add: we don't treat Bilble like You do your Quran.
Bible was written by men. Over ages. It is inspired, but in the end thats just a book. A thing. It wasn't send down by God. He didn't need to do that - He came down here by himself, a spoke with people face to face. And Jesus was the Word of God (not a book, not a thing, but God Himself)
 
Greetings and peace Crescent;
Isaiah 11:12
12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH. (KJV)

I feel quite happy that there were messages about the four corners of the Earth, I feel this type of language was used in a descriptive way to put across some other message.

Maybe you have to look at the understanding of the people at the times the Bible was written. Just imagine a prophet holding up an orange and saying this is the shape of the Earth, and we are living near the equator and points to that part on the orange
The man says don’t be daft if we lived on a ball shaped object we would fall off.
The prophet then goes on to explain gravity to the man
Right says the man I should get the feeling of walking up and down at right angles to the Earth and there is some invisible force field holding me onto this orange shaped Earth, but the Earth is flat here.
The prophet then goes on to explain about the size of the Earth and that people in Australia are not standing upside down

The man would be justified in saying, if you cannot show me proof that the Earth is round, so then I will not believe anything else you say.

There are many place in the Bible were analogies are used, but analogies by their very description cannot be totally accurate, and often you can find several analogies for the same thing.

Jesus described heaven in many ways he used words like a sheep pen, wedding feast, vinyard, so that people would have some idea of the concept of heaven.

Were the messages of prophets more to do with giving science lessons or teaching people about God?

In the spirit of searching other faiths with kindness

Eric
 
4-Christ-Alone said:
We often get questions along the lines of “Explain how these verses do not contradict!” or “Look, here is an error in the Bible!” Admittedly, some of the things people bring up are difficult to answer. However, there are viable and intellectually plausible answers to every supposed Bible contradiction and error. There are books and websites available that list “all the errors in the Bible.” Most people simply get their ammunition from these places – they do not find supposed errors on their own. There are also books and websites available that refute each and every last one of these supposed errors. The saddest thing is that most people who attack the Bible are not truly interested in an answer – all they want to do is attack. Many "Bible attackers" are even aware of the answers, but they continue to use the same old shallow attacks again and again.

No i am not attacking for fun. I simplyl want to know why the Bible claims thet trinity is non-existant.

4-Christ-Alone said:
If you read the Bible, at face value, without a preconceived bias for finding errors – you will find it to be a coherent, consistent, and relatively easy-to-understand book. Yes, there are difficult passages. Yes, there are verses that appear to contradict each other. We must remember that the Bible was written by approximately 40 different authors over a period of around 1500 years. Each writer wrote from a different perspective, to a different audience, for a different purpose. We should expect some differences! However, a difference is not a contradiction or an error. It is only an error if there is absolutely no conceivable manner in which the verses or passages can be reconciled. Even if we do not have the answer right now, that does not mean the answer does not exist. Many have found a supposed error in the Bible in relation to history or geography only to find out that the Bible is correct once further archaeological evidence is discovered.

It does not matter how many humans wrote the Bible, when they wrote the Bible. Because the Bible is the Words of God inspired.

4-Christ-Alone said:
Jesus is never recorded in the Bible as saying the exact words, “I am God.” That does not mean, however, that He did not proclaim that He is God. Take for example Jesus’ words in John 10:30, “I and the Father are one.” At first glance, this might not seem to be a claim to be God. However, look at the Jews’ reaction to His statement, “We are not stoning you for any of these, replied the Jews, but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God” (John 10:33). The Jews understood Jesus’ statement to be a claim to be God. In the following verses, Jesus never corrects the Jews by saying, “I did not claim to be God.” That indicates Jesus was truly saying He was God by declaring, “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30). John 8:58 is another example. Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, before Abraham was born, I am!" Again, in response, the Jews take up stones in an attempt to stone Jesus (John 8:59). Why would the Jews want to stone Jesus if He hadn’t said something they believed to be blasphemous, namely, a claim to be God?

I believe you are wrong. Look at John 10 in more detail:

25Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me, 26but you do not believe because you are not my sheep. 27My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. 28I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. 29My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all[d]; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. 30I and the Father are one."

They are one in purpose. They cannot be one in being, because verse 29 says "my father is greater than all" as in 'my dad who is not me, is the best!'. Noone will pluck them out of Jesus' hand nor God's. They are one in purpose.

31Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, 32but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?"

33"We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."

We can see here that the Jews misunderstood Jesus (as usual e.g. eating his flesh).

34Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'[e]? 35If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken—


John 17:20-22 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one."

So mankind is also one with God. We are not divine.

36what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? 37Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. 38But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father." 39Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.

Then he says "why do you accuse me of blamsphemy? i never said i was god. i said i was God's son". And other people have been God's


John 1:1 says that “the Word was God.” John 1:14 says that “the Word became flesh.” This clearly indicates that Jesus is God in the flesh. Acts 20:28 tells us, "...Be shepherds of the church of God, which He bought with His own blood." Who bought the church with His own blood? Jesus Christ. Acts 20:28 declares that God purchased the church with His own blood. Therefore, Jesus is God!

Thomas the disciple declared concerning Jesus, “Lord and my God” (John 20:28). Jesus does not correct him. Titus 2:13 encourages us to wait for the coming of our God and Savior - Jesus Christ (see also 2 Peter 1:1). In Hebrews 1:8, the Father declares of Jesus, "But about the Son He says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom."

In Revelation, an angel instructed the Apostle John to only worship God (Revelation 19:10). Several times in Scripture Jesus receives worship (Matthew 2:11; 14:33; 28:9,17; Luke 24:52; John 9:38). He never rebukes people for worshiping Him. If Jesus were not God, He would have told people to not worship Him, just as the angel in Revelation had. There are many other verses and passages of Scripture that argue for Jesus’ deity.

The most important reason that Jesus has to be God is that if He is not God, His death would not have been sufficient to pay the penalty for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2). Only God could pay such an infinite penalty. Only God could take on the sins of the world (2 Corinthians 5:21), die, and be resurrected - proving His victory over sin and death.
 
4-Christ-Alone said:
We often get questions along the lines of “Explain how these verses do not contradict!” or “Look, here is an error in the Bible!” Admittedly, some of the things people bring up are difficult to answer. However, there are viable and intellectually plausible answers to every supposed Bible contradiction and error. There are books and websites available that list “all the errors in the Bible.” Most people simply get their ammunition from these places – they do not find supposed errors on their own. There are also books and websites available that refute each and every last one of these supposed errors. The saddest thing is that most people who attack the Bible are not truly interested in an answer – all they want to do is attack. Many "Bible attackers" are even aware of the answers, but they continue to use the same old shallow attacks again and again.

No i am not attacking for fun. I simplyl want to know why the Bible claims thet trinity is non-existant.

4-Christ-Alone said:
If you read the Bible, at face value, without a preconceived bias for finding errors – you will find it to be a coherent, consistent, and relatively easy-to-understand book. Yes, there are difficult passages. Yes, there are verses that appear to contradict each other. We must remember that the Bible was written by approximately 40 different authors over a period of around 1500 years. Each writer wrote from a different perspective, to a different audience, for a different purpose. We should expect some differences! However, a difference is not a contradiction or an error. It is only an error if there is absolutely no conceivable manner in which the verses or passages can be reconciled. Even if we do not have the answer right now, that does not mean the answer does not exist. Many have found a supposed error in the Bible in relation to history or geography only to find out that the Bible is correct once further archaeological evidence is discovered.

It does not matter how many humans wrote the Bible, when they wrote the Bible. Because the Bible is the Words of God inspired.

4-Christ-Alone said:
Jesus is never recorded in the Bible as saying the exact words, “I am God.” That does not mean, however, that He did not proclaim that He is God. Take for example Jesus’ words in John 10:30, “I and the Father are one.” At first glance, this might not seem to be a claim to be God. However, look at the Jews’ reaction to His statement, “We are not stoning you for any of these, replied the Jews, but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God” (John 10:33). The Jews understood Jesus’ statement to be a claim to be God. In the following verses, Jesus never corrects the Jews by saying, “I did not claim to be God.” That indicates Jesus was truly saying He was God by declaring, “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30). John 8:58 is another example. Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, before Abraham was born, I am!" Again, in response, the Jews take up stones in an attempt to stone Jesus (John 8:59). Why would the Jews want to stone Jesus if He hadn’t said something they believed to be blasphemous, namely, a claim to be God?

I believe you are wrong. Look at John 10 in more detail:

25Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me, 26but you do not believe because you are not my sheep. 27My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. 28I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. 29My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all[d]; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. 30I and the Father are one."

They are one in purpose. They cannot be one in being, because verse 29 says "my father is greater than all" as in 'my dad who is not me, is the best!'. Noone will pluck them out of Jesus' hand nor God's. They are one in purpose.

31Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, 32but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?"

33"We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God."

We can see here that the Jews misunderstood Jesus (as usual e.g. eating his flesh).

34Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'[e]? 35If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken—


John 17:20-22 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one."

So mankind is also one with God. We are not divine.

36what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'? 37Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. 38But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father." 39Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.

Then he says "why do you accuse me of blamsphemy? i never said i was god. i said i was God's son". And other people have been God's sons:

Jacob is God's son and firstborn: "Israel is my son, even my firstborn" Exodus 4:22.

Solomon is God's son "He shall build an house for my name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son": 2 Samuel 7:13-14.

Ephraim is God's firstborn: "for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my firstborn." Jeremiah 31:9 (who is God's firstborn? Israel or Ephraim?).

Adam is the son of God "Adam, which was the son of God." Luke 3:38.

4-Christ-Alone said:
John 1:1 says that “the Word was God.” John 1:14 says that “the Word became flesh.” This clearly indicates that Jesus is God in the flesh. Acts 20:28 tells us, "...Be shepherds of the church of God, which He bought with His own blood." Who bought the church with His own blood? Jesus Christ. Acts 20:28 declares that God purchased the church with His own blood. Therefore, Jesus is God!

We must first know that John 1:1 is terribly translated and this universally recognised by biblical scholars:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and a god was the Word. He was in the beginning with the (ho theos) God."

This does not support the trinity.

4-Christ-Alone said:
Thomas the disciple declared concerning Jesus, “Lord and my God” (John 20:28). Jesus does not correct him.

First of all many people have been called 'lord':


Prophet Abraham:

"Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord (Abraham) being old also?"

Genesis 18:12

Esau:

"And he commanded them, saying, Thus shall ye speak unto my lord Esau; Thy servant Jacob saith thus, I have sojourned with Laban, and stayed there until now:"

Genesis 32:4

Joseph:

"And we said unto my lord, We have a father, an old man, and a child of his old age, a little one; and his brother is dead, and he alone is left of his mother, and his father loveth him."
Titus 2:13 encourages us to wait for the coming of our God and Savior - Jesus Christ (see also 2 Peter 1:1). In Hebrews 1:8, the Father declares of Jesus, "But about the Son He says, "Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom."

And look:

26A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, "Peace be with you!" 27Then he said to Thomas, "Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe."

28Thomas said to him, "My Lord and my God!"

Thomas has just seen a dead man 'come back to life', and is shocked. So like people these days say "oh my God!", those days they were different. Also notice the exclamation mark on the end? This means that he is shocked.

4-Christ-Alone said:
In Revelation, an angel instructed the Apostle John to only worship God (Revelation 19:10). Several times in Scripture Jesus receives worship (Matthew 2:11; 14:33; 28:9,17; Luke 24:52; John 9:38). He never rebukes people for worshiping Him. If Jesus were not God, He would have told people to not worship Him, just as the angel in Revelation had. There are many other verses and passages of Scripture that argue for Jesus’ deity.

A book can explain this better:

With regard to John 9:38 "Lord. I believe, and he worshipped him." and Matthew 28:17 "they saw him, they worshipped him." Please note that the word translated as "worshipped" in both verses is the GREEK word "prosekunesan" which is derived from the root word proskuneo {pros-ku-neh'-o}. The literal meaning of this word is (and I quote): "to kiss, like a dog licking his masters hand." This word also has the general meaning of "bow, crouch, crawl, kneel or prostrate." Please check the Strong's concordance for the true meaning of this word. Is the act of kissing someone's hand the same as worshipping him? Once again, selective translation.

However, the above two verses of John and Matthew are not the only two verses of the Bible were such selective translation techniques are employed in order to impress upon the reader a chosen doctrine. For example, in the "Gospel of Matthew" the English "translation" records that Jesus was "worshipped" by Magi that came from the East (2:11); by a ruler (9:18) , by boat people (14:33), by a Canaanite woman (15:24), by the mother of the Zebedees (20:20); and by Mary Magdalene and the other Mary (28:9) to name but a very few.

Since worshipping any one other than God is a fundamental sin, therefore, the reader understands that Jesus was God since he condoned them "worshipping" him. Since Jesus (pbuh) never once in the whole Bible ever told anyone "worship me!" (as God Himself does in many places), therefore, once again, we are told that Jesus was "hinting" that he wants us to worship him. However, as we can plainly see, what the author was in fact saying in these verses is that these people "fell at Jesus' feet," or that these people "knelt before Jesus."

How then shall we interpret their "kneeling down before Jesus."? Should we understand that they were "praying" to him? Far from it! Let us ask the Bible to explain:

"And when Abigail saw David, she hasted, and lighted off the ass, and fell before David on her face, and bowed herself to the ground, And fell at his feet, and said, Upon me, my lord, [upon] me [let this] iniquity [be]: and let thine handmaid, I pray thee, speak in thine audience, and hear the words of thine handmaid."

1 Samuel 25:23-24

When Abigail "fell before" king David was she "worshipping" him? Was she "praying" to him? When she addressed him as "my lord," did she mean that he was her God?. Similarly,

"Then she went in, and fell at his (Elisha's) feet, and bowed herself to the ground, and took up her son, and went out."

2 Kings 4:37

"And his (Joseph's) brethren also went and fell down before his face; and they said, Behold, we [be] thy servants."

Genesis 50:18

"And there went over a ferry boat to carry over the king's household, and to do what he thought good. And Shimei the son of Gera fell down before the king, as he was come over Jordan;"

2 Samuel 19:18

"Worship" is one of those English words which carry a double meaning. The one most popular among most people is "to pray to." This is the meaning that immediately springs into everyone's mind when they read this word. However, "worship" has another meaning. It also means "to respect," "to reverence," or "to adore" (see for example Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, tenth edition). The second meaning is used more frequently in England than, for example, in the United States. However, the first remains the most popular and well known meaning in any English speaking country. Even at that, in Britain it is not at all uncommon even in this age to find the British addressing their nobles as "your worship."

What the translators have done when translating these verse is that they have "technically" translated the word correctly, however, the true meaning of this word is now completely lost.

Finally, in order to seal the proof of this matter and to dispel any lingering doubt that may remain in the reader's mind, the reader is encouraged to obtain a copy of the "New English Bible." In it they will find the translations of the quoted verses to read:

1. "bowed to the ground" (2:11);
2. "fell at his feet" (14:33);
3. "falling prostrate before him" (28:9), and
4. "fell prostrate before him" (28:17)...etc.

Please also read the translation of these verses in "The Complete Bible, an American Translation" By Edward Goodspeed and J. M. Powis Smith where they are once again honestly translated as:

1. "they threw themselves down and did homage to him" (2:11),
2. "fell down before him"(14:33),
3. "and they went up to him and clasped his feed and bowed to the ground before him" (28:9), and
4. "bowed down before him"(28:17), etc.

Once again, we remember that such sublime manipulation of the translation in order to establish with the reader a chosen doctrine was exposed by God in the noble Qur'an. The Qur'an says:

"There is among them a party who distort the Scripture with their tongues that you might think that it is from the Scripture, when it is not from the Scripture; and they say, 'It is from God,' but it is not from God; and they speak a lie against God, and [well] they know it!"

The Qur'an, A'al-Umran(3):78


4-Christ-Alone said:
The most important reason that Jesus has to be God is that if He is not God, His death would not have been sufficient to pay the penalty for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2). Only God could pay such an infinite penalty. Only God could take on the sins of the world (2 Corinthians 5:21), die, and be resurrected - proving His victory over sin and death

"And again he entered into Capernaum after some days; and it was noised that he was in the house. And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them. And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four. And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay. When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee. But there was certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts, Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only? And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts? Which is easier, to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk? But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,) I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house. And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion."

Mark 2:1-12

As seen in chapter one, when Paul came with his new and innovative ideas on how to improve upon the message of Jesus (pbuh), he began by dropping specific commandments. This continued until he decided that his alleged "visions" were sufficient authority to completely discard all of the commandments which both prophet Moses as well as prophet Jesus (pbut) both observed very strictly throughout their lives. The fact that both of these prophets are well known to have spent their lives commanding their followers to uphold these laws and commandments is casually brushed aside by "St. Paul." His "visions," we are told, are higher in authority than the commands of Jesus (pbuh) during his lifetime.

Once Paul was finished nullifying the law of God through Moses and Jesus and simplifying the religion for them he began to get many converts. This is because his "Christianity" only required "faith" and no actual work (Romans 3:28). But faith without work was too flimsy a concept to build one's whole way of life around. Paul needed a stupendous and monumental event to have faith IN order for his claims to be accepted by anyone. Thus the original sin and the atonement were born.

Paul claimed that God Almighty had created mankind inherently sinful and as inheritors of "the sin of Adam." He claimed that this hereditary burden was so great that the creator of all of the heavens and earth, and yes, the creator of the concepts of sin and forgiveness themselves, could not forgive this sin. This, in Paul's estimation, was beyond God's capabilities. Paul preached that the only way the creator of the heavens and the earth and everything in-between could forgive this sin was to have his sinless "only begotten son" beaten, spat on, stripped, whipped, cut, humiliated, and finally killed in the most gruesome and drawn-out way known to man at the time; by hanging on the cross, and thus becoming a curse upon mankind.

"Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree"

Galatians 3:13:

Only then would God be able to forgive this sin.

However, if we were to read the words of Jesus (pbuh) in Mark 2:9 we would find that Jesus (pbuh) informs us that for him to tell a man that his sins are forgiven is much easier than to cure a paralytic and cause him to walk, and since Jesus (pbuh) had the power to cure paralytics, therefore, he demonstrates to us that forgiving sins is much easier for him.

However, we already know that God Almighty the "Father" of all believers

"And call no [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven"

Matthew 23:9

We further know that God Almighty is greater in power than all humans, inluding Jesus:

"..my Father is greater than I",

John 14:28

Finally, we know that Jesus (pbuh) gets his power from God:

"I can of mine own self do nothing...,"

John 5:30

"Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:"

Acts 2:22

So it stands to reason that what is easy for Jesus (pbuh) is trivial and inconsequential for God Almighty Himself. Thus, if Jesus (pbuh) can forgive sins with the utmost ease simply by uttering the words "your sins are forgiven you," then it is well within the ability of God Almighty Himself to do the same simply by willing it, even without uttering a word. Indeed, we can even read in the Bible:

"Who [is] a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth [in] mercy."

Micah 7:18

"Nevertheless, He (God), [being] full of compassion, forgave [their] iniquity, and destroyed [them] not: yea, many a time turned He His anger away, and did not stir up all his wrath. For He remembered that they [were but] flesh; a wind that passeth away, and cometh not again."

Psalm 78:38-39

"I, [even] I, [am] he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins."

Isaiah 43:25

Well, how then does God Almighty forgive our sins? Is He able to simply say "you are forgiven" to those who turn to Him in repentance or must He first sacrifice a sinless individual before He can do this? To get the answer let us read the Bible:

"It may be that the house of Judah will hear all the evil which I purpose to do unto them; that they may return every man from his evil way; that I may forgive their iniquity and their sin."

Jeremiah 36:3

"Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon."

Isaiah 55:7

"I acknowledged my sin unto thee, and mine iniquity have I not hid. I said, I will confess my transgressions unto the LORD; and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin. Selah."

Psalm 32:5

"By mercy and truth iniquity is purged..."

Proverbs 16:6

"If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."
 
Eric H said:
I feel quite happy that there were messages about the four corners of the Earth, I feel this type of language was used in a descriptive way to put across some other message.

The Bible is supposedly the literal word of God. Are you trying to say that the Bible did not "mean" that the Earth had corners? I find it quite dubious that the Bible has the very same scientific flaws as some early Greek astrologers.

Eric H said:
Maybe you have to look at the understanding of the people at the times the Bible was written. Just imagine a prophet holding up an orange and saying this is the shape of the Earth, and we are living near the equator and points to that part on the orange
The man says don’t be daft if we lived on a ball shaped object we would fall off.
The prophet then goes on to explain gravity to the man
Right says the man I should get the feeling of walking up and down at right angles to the Earth and there is some invisible force field holding me onto this orange shaped Earth, but the Earth is flat here.
The prophet then goes on to explain about the size of the Earth and that people in Australia are not standing upside down

Given the time period, dont you think its a bit odd that people would belive a man to be divine (son of God) rather than believe the earth was round? If its easy for a man to be considered to be the son of God, then obviously it would also be easy to convince that the earth is round.

Eric H said:
The man would be justified in saying, if you cannot show me proof that the Earth is round, so then I will not believe anything else you say.

Yet they believe Mary gave birth as a Virgin, Jesus's miracles and his relation as the son of God, the miracles of Moses, Jacob, Adam, and so on. My point is that based on that reasoning, miracles in the Bible would be as questionanble as the shape of the Earth.

Eric H said:
There are many place in the Bible were analogies are used, but analogies by their very description cannot be totally accurate, and often you can find several analogies for the same thing.

Jesus described heaven in many ways he used words like a sheep pen, wedding feast, vinyard, so that people would have some idea of the concept of heaven.

I never disagreed with that.

Peace.
 
Besides, it isnt the bible that saved me, or it wasnt reading it that convinced me that it was the truth, it was asking Jesus into my life as Lord and saviour that turned my mess of a life around in an instince, and that my friends, no1 can take away.

Glad that it's helped you in your life mate. :)

That's what relgion is about, how it helps us through the trials and tribulations of life. And that we all try to accept each other for what we believe.
 
The most important reason that Jesus has to be God is that if He is not God, His death would not have been sufficient to pay the penalty for the sins of the whole world (1 John 2:2). Only God could pay such an infinite penalty. Only God could take on the sins of the world (2 Corinthians 5:21), die, and be resurrected - proving His victory over sin and death.

What does it mean that he ''died for our sins''?
 
The Christians think God turned into a human named Jesus and threw himself at the authority's hands and was crucified. Paul of Tarsus in the Bible claimed that Jesus died for our sins. Paul made something up about how Adam's sin of eating the apple lasted until 'god' "died" for us.
 
You see Avar- all teological problems in christianity Submit solves in 3 senteces.
To sum up:
we believe in St. Paul who "mades up" some stories, and the graves sin one can commit is to eat an apple. ;)

I hope some wiser christian can answer Your question...because with this question i quite often have problems myself
n.
 
Please do not become enemies with me...God knows enough people from other religions hate me (for not being one of them).

"Not only CAN we take the Bible literally, but we MUST take the Bible literally." http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-literal.html

Therefore when Jesus said "our God is One" he must have been right.

Would you agree?
 
What does it mean that he ''died for our sins''?]

Well i can try and answer this the best i can, what ive been taught, is that God is a just God, and its in his nature to punish sin. Now man sinned, so we have a problem, but God thought, i dont want to punish them because they fall, so he became flesh, he became one of us, so that God as a man, could take our punishment for us. Now if i am right muslims believe God doesn not need to sacrafice anything or any1 for the sins that we have alll comitted.

What we both believe in is God, we also agree there was a man Jesus, yous believe he was a prophet, we believe he was sent by God to take away the sins of the world. Like i said before, i dont believe this because it makes the most sense in my opinion, but i believe this because of experiences worshipping Jesus that are beond words to describe his presence, ive never felt so much thickness in the air of complete holyness and peace, Now if it wasnt for them experiences, i doubt i would be following him, but they have lef me with no doubts that he died for my sins.

Anyway i could go on all day

God bless
 
I was brought up as a Christain.

We were told it is not the literal word of God. And reasons given for that.

And they make perfect sense.
 
Last edited:
Let's put it this way: most christian, average (whatever this mean...) christian, traditional denominations don't claim that Bible is a literal word of God.
And yes - there are exeptions. Like always. You can finde them even in islam. ;)
n.
 
Let's put it this way: most christian, average (whatever this mean...) christian, traditional denominations don't claim that Bible is a literal word of God.
And yes - there are exeptions. Like always. You can finde them even in islam. ;)
n.

seriously speaking it would be nice for you to come to my college and preach to some Christians, so they dont go round saying 'The Word of G-d says this and that'

EDIT:
Now if it wasnt for them experiences, i doubt i would be following him, but they have lef me with no doubts that he died for my sins.

So you kinda agree you only really worship Jesus and so on because of the feeling and beautiful experience you have had at the hands of askin Jesus to be ur saviour and praising him?

Peace be upon Jesus and his Mother and his followers.

Peace
 
Last edited:
Well i can try and answer this the best i can, what ive been taught, is that God is a just God, and its in his nature to punish sin. Now man sinned, so we have a problem, but God thought, i dont want to punish them because they fall, so he became flesh, he became one of us, so that God as a man, could take our punishment for us. Now if i am right muslims believe God doesn not need to sacrafice anything or any1 for the sins that we have alll comitted.

What we both believe in is God, we also agree there was a man Jesus, yous believe he was a prophet, we believe he was sent by God to take away the sins of the world. Like i said before, i dont believe this because it makes the most sense in my opinion, but i believe this because of experiences worshipping Jesus that are beond words to describe his presence, ive never felt so much thickness in the air of complete holyness and peace, Now if it wasnt for them experiences, i doubt i would be following him, but they have lef me with no doubts that he died for my sins.

Anyway i could go on all day

God bless

That made sense.

I too, can't explain the feeling i get when i read from the Guru Granth Sahib (holy book) to praise God. it's a feeling which cannot be expressed by words.

I was just wondering if Jesus did die for our sins, then who will die for us again? because us humans are sinning even more than they did in the time of Jesus.

Just something we all need to ponder over. Personally i believe we will all suffer for our own actions.
 
Oh so Avar you have the really special type of feeling which cant be expressed by words aswell, when you read The Guru Granth Sahib?

Peace
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top