The lebanese demands

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silver
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 102
  • Views Views 12K
Theres a rumour, that Isael started all this on purpose, so that they can increase the oil price, decrease the value of the dollar, and thus help them come closer to their dream of becoming the super power of the world. Beleive it or not but i think they are actually trying to sink America.
 
Im morocaan. When Spain forcibly expelled its jewish population, it was in arab muslim maghrib that they found safe refuge.
 
Iqram, so what do you want israel to do just sitt back at let the arabs exterminate us.
:sl:
Since when did the Arabs want to exterminate Jews? Get rid of Israel and replace it with a state of New Palestine, yes, but not exterminate the Jews. Even the Iranian President probably doesn't want to do that.

They sure did that to the jews in khaibar in mohamed times... oops i shouldn't know that should i.
The people who were executed were war criminals or something. And this allegation has been refuted hundreds of times anyway.
:w:
 
They did what in khaibar??? You see, there is nothing wrong about knowing things about other religions, atleast learn what is right!

Khaibar-At the end of the war, a jewsih lady invited the prophet [saw] and the companions [ra] to a feast, they accepted and even then, the jews, as always, cunning and sneaky, tried to poison the Prophet [saw], but failed and then martyred another companion [ra].

Also, the reason for this attack was because they had a treaty, and they broke away and transgressed upon the clauses of the treaty, and in those days, if you break a treaty, it means war......

If only you knew that...it would have been ok.....
 
Now im not going overly religious now but i just hate it when people say islam is peaceful when i know things like this exists.
:sl:
That attack will probably happen because of the current occupation of Palestine.
:w:
 
Imagine if the Mexican-American community in California, whose numbers are greater than the number of Palestinians in the West Bank, decides tomorrow to claim that the United States is occupying their land, because they live there and they want their own Mexican state. Imagine if, when the U.S. government says, "No, you can live here, but you cannot have sovereignty, you cannot have your own state," they start sending suicide bombers, shooters, mortars, etc. into the rest of the country. What do you think would happen?
:sl:
The Mexican-Americans aren't being forced to spend their whole lives in refugee camps.

Imagine that King Zurg of Mars came down from space with his fleet of ultra-high tech space battlecruisers, and took over most of the planet, evicting humans from their homes and levelling their cities. You are forced to live either in squalid refugee camps, or in the rest of the planet, which is impoverished because of it's destroyed infrastucture. No army on Earth can defeat the Martian army, and all the other civilisations in space agree with the Martian's occupation of Earth. How would you feel?
:w:
 
Moshe I don't want to get into a long debate with you ... but unless you are an Arabic Jew as in of middle eastern origin you have no rights to Israel.... Jacob is Israel ... can you honestly tell me you have a direct link to him? if you are European and I have met many of what you call ashkenazic Jews , They are descendants of the khazars and have no rights to be in the holy land...This is just to answer the portion of how Israel the holy land belongs to you ... aside from that I don't wish to get into a heated debate over the usual......... nothing
the land of Palestine was "supposedly" promised to the seed of
Abraham. If one researches the Ancient Hebrew laws, the right of decent or
Inheritance is based on the eldest son, no matter whom the mother is. If
this is the case, then the land was promised to Ishamel (for he was the
eldest of Abraham's sons) and the Father of Palestinian Arabs. In addition,
modern day Jews from Russia, Poland and most parts of Eastern Europe have NO
genetic link to the ancient Hebrews - they for the most part are decendents
of Khazars, who converted to Judaism in the 7th century (this has been
documented by Jewish scholars, not Arabs). The modern day Palestinians can
claim a more direct link to the Hebrew tribes than the founders of modern day
"Israel." What the Western Press purposely avoids mentioning is the fact
that at the start of the 20th century, less than 5% of the land of Palestine
was Jewish. The modern State of Israel was built on lands illegally taken and
assimilated from Palestinian Christians and Muslims. Also, the Hebrews only
ruled the land of Palestine for a combined 411 years - the Muslims have ruled
the land for 1,500 years. In addition, the land of Canaan (Palestine) had a
history long before the Jewish tribes immigrated to the area.

NATIONHOOD AND JERUSALEM
1. Israel became a nation in 1312 B.C.E., two thousand years before the rise of Islam.
The use of the word “nation” is ambiguous unless it is defined. It is confusing and misleading to use a modern notion and apply it to what happened in 1312 BC. This is how Black’s Law Dictionary defines the word "nation":

“a people, or aggregation of men, existing in the form of an organized jural society, usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same customs, possessing historic continuity, and distinguished from other like groups by their racial origin and characteristics, and generally, but not necessarily, living under the same government and sovereignty.”
According to this definition Israel became a nation once it became an independent kingdom in 1011 BC (King David 1011-971 BC; and King Solomon 971-931 BC). In 931 BC, the kingdom was divided in two: Israel in the north, (capital Samaria) from 931 to 722 BC; and Judah in the south (capital Jerusalem) from 931 to 587 BC.
Samaria fell to Assyria in 722 BC and a large portion of the population was deported. This kingdom lasted for 209 years.
Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians in 587 BC and the cream of the population was deported. This kingdom lasted for 344 year.
The total number of years during which Israel was a "nation", even if we take into consideration the small Kingdom of Judah is 424 years. Outside this period Israel was more of a religion than a nation.
The Pittsburgh Platform of 1885 was issued by a group of reform rabbis. It stated: “we consider ourselves no longer a nation but a religious community" (see full text of Pittsburg Platform ).
Furthermore, a letter dated April 20, 1964, from Assistant Secretary of State Phillips Talbot to Rabbi Elmer Berger stated: the State Department "does not recognize a legal-political relationship based upon religious identification of American citizens ... it should be clear that the Department of State does not regard the Jewish people concept as a concept of international law" (see full text of the letter ).
Israel ceased to be a nation in 587 BC. It became a nation again in AD 1948. According to the definition given in Black’s Law Dictionary Jews who are not Israelis do not belong to the Israeli nation, they belong the Jewish faith like their coreligionists in Israel.
2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the Modern State of Israel.
First, there are no Arab refugees in Israel, unless the writer has already annexed the Occupied Territories, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon to Israel.
The problem of the Palestinian refugees, that the writer calls “Arab” refugees to confuse the reader and avoid using the word Palestinian, started from the moment Israel was established in 1948, since some 700,000 Palestinians were expelled from their homes and their homeland and were not allowed to return. There is even a UN resolution that deal with the Palestinian refugees. It is General Assembly resolution 194 of 11 December 1948. The resolution deals explicitly, among other things, with the return of the Palestinian refugees to their homes.
Whether the "Arab" refugees began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967 or not is irrelevant. The fact is that there is today a universal aknowledgment that there is a Palestinian people, even Israel acknowledges this fact. To deny it won't solve the problem of Israel.


3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 B.C.E. the Jews have had dominion over the land for one thousand years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years.
What is said in No. 1 above is relevant here. I detect a contradiction between what is said in 1 above and what is being said here. How can Israel be considered a nation in 1312 BC (see No. 1 above) when the "Jewish conquest" of the land of Canaan occurred later in 1272 BC?
There can be no nation without “inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth,” according to the definition. The continuous presence in the land, if we accept it for the sake of argument, was a presence of the Jews as individuals not as a nation. Following the first revolt, the Romans destroyed the Temple in AD 70. After the second revolt (AD 132-135), the Jews were either killed or sold into slavery and dispersed in the Roman Empire. Emperor Hadrian built a temple in honor of Jupiter on the site of the Jewish temple and issued a decree that prohibited under penalty of death the presence of the Jews in Jerusalem. The prohibition was lifted after the Muslim Arab conquest.

4. The only Arab dominion since the conquest in 635 C.E. lasted no more than 22 years.
In 638, not 635, Jerusalem and Palestine, were conquered by the Muslim Arabs. The Muslim rule lasted from 638 to 1099, from 1187 to 1229 and from 1239 to 1917 which is the year Jerusalem fell to General Allenby. In the interim periods, that is from 1099 to 1187 and from 1229 to 1239 the Crusaders established the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. The total number of years Muslims ruled Jerusalem and Palestine is 1,181 years not 22. The writer was off the mark by just 1,159 years. It should be mentioned that before the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War One, there was only one dominion, Muslim dominion. Speaking of Arab dominion is misleading.

5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.
Jerusalem was a Jewish capital for no more than 424 years (see No. 1 above). In fact, Jerusalem was a meaningful capital only when the kingdom established by David was unified, that is from 1011 BC to 931 BC, or 80 years. The fact that Jerusalem was never a capital of any Arab or Muslim entity doesn't make it less of an Arab city. San Antonio has never been the capital of the United States. Does this mean that it is a Mexican city?

6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in Tanach, the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Koran.
What does this suppose to mean? What is the conclusion that must be drawn from this statement? How about counting the number of times Jerusalem was mentioned in the New Testament?

7. King David founded the city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.
The answer given in 6 above is relevant here. Again, what about Jesus? In their profession of faith, Christians say at every mass: “for our sake he (Jesus Christ) was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered, died and was buried. On the third day he rose again in fulfillment of the Scriptures." These events didn't happen in Paris or New York but in Jerusalem.

8. Jews pray facing Jerusalem. Muslims pray with their backs toward Jerusalem.
Another incongruous statement. What are we supposed to make of it? The issue is not a religious one, as the author is trying to establish from points 5 to 8 . It is an issue of self-determination of a disenfranchised indigenous people. Also, the writer is presenting the issue as if it is an issue between the Jews and the Muslims ignoring the fact that the Arab Christians in the Middle East outnumber the Jews of Israel and the billion Christians in the world outnumber the 14 million Jews. The fact also is that Christianity has more holy sites in Jerusalem than Judaism and Islam combined. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the holiest place in Christianity, is in Jerusalem. If the issue is a religious one, then the Christians' claim is stronger than that of the Jews or the Muslims.


ARAB AND JEWISH REFUGEES

9. In 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty-eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.
Simha Flapan in his book, The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities, refers to the terrorists methods used by the Haganah, Irgun and LEHI to force the Palestinians out of their homeland. Flapan estimated that “84 percent (of the Palestinians) left in direct response to Israeli actions.” The Irish journalist, Erskine Childers, examined the American and the British radio-monitoring records for all 1948. In his article "The Other Exodus" that appeared in the (London) Spectator of May 12, 1961, he wrote the following: "There was not a single order, or appeal, or suggestion about evacuation from Palestine from any Arab radio station, inside or outside Palestine, in 1948. There is repeated monitored record of Arab appeals, even flat orders, to the civilians of Palestine to stay put." (see the full text ).

10. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms.
The Jews were forced to flee the Arab countries not because of Arab brutality but because of Jewish brutality. Akiva Orr in his book Israel: Politics, Myths and Identity Crises wrote the following: “in 1948 Jews were not expelled from countries like Iraq, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya, but induced to leave by Zionist emissaries from Israel who often used dirty tricks like throwing bombs into synagogues to create the impression of anti-Jewish persecution to stampede the Jews to Israel.” Once in Israel, some of the Iraqi Jews have even sued the Israeli government for damages. Also, Wilbur Crane Evenlan, a former senior officer in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) wrote in his 1980 book Ropes of Sand: America's Failure in the Middle East:

"In attempts to portray the Iraqis as ani-American and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs in the U.S. Information Service library and in synagogues. Soon leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel. ... Although the Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that the synagogue and library bombings as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-American leaflet campaings had been the work of an underground Zionist organization, most of the world believed reports that Arab terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the Zionists had "rescued" really just in order to increase Israel's Jewish population." (pp. 48-49)
For a first-hand account by an eyewitness, read Naeim Giladi's testimony in The Link of April-May 1998, published by the Americans for Middle East Understanding, Inc. Read The Jews of Iraq .
11. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be around 630,000. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands is estimated to be the same.
Again the Palestinian refugees, (not Arab refugees) who left Israel in 1948 did not leave Palestine voluntarily but were driven out by the Jewish terrorist organizations (see 9 above). On the other hand, the Jewish “refugees” left voluntarily or induced to leave from their Arab homelands (see No. 10 above).

12. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, theirs is the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples' lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country no larger than the state of New Jersey.
Should we show our appreciation to the writer for his concern about the Palestinian refugees who were “INTENTIONALY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands?” The writer is lamenting the fact that the Palestinians are “the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples’ lands.” Well, their land is Palestine. I am all for their return to their land. The writer wants the Palestinian refugees to be absorbed in the Arab lands. This is exactly how criminals think. They want to remove any trace of the crime they have committed; then they can delude themselves that they have a clear conscience.


THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT

13. The Arabs are represented by eight separate nations, not including the Palestinians. There is only one Jewish nation. The Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended itself each time and won.
If the writer knew how to count he would have found out that there are 20 Arab states not 8. Whether there are 20 or 70 Arab states, Palestinians are entitled to live in their homeland. As far as the "five wars" intitiated by the Arabs: The first war was the 1948 war and was triggered by the establishment of Israel. The 1956 war was started by Israel with the help of France and Great Britain. The 1967 war was started by Israel. The 1973 war was launched by Egypt and Syria to liberate their occupied territories, not more. The 1982 war against Lebanon was started by Israel.

14. The P.L.O.'s Charter still calls for the destruction of the State of Israel. Israel has given the Palestinians most of the West Bank land, autonomy under the Palestinian Authority, and has supplied them with weapons.
The PLO Charter has been amended and all clauses calling for Israel’s destruction were cancelled. On April 24, 1996, the Palestine National Council voted 504 to 54 to cancel those clauses. Contrary to what is stated, Israel has NOT given the Palestinians most of the West Bank. The West Bank was divided into three zones: Area A fully controlled by the Palestinian Authority consists of 12%; Area B jointly controlled by Israel (security control) and the Palestinian Authority (civilian control) consists of 26.8%; and Area C totally controlled by Israel consists of 61.2%. Who then controls most of the West Bank? (see map )

15. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.
Under Jordanian rule Israel, the Jewish state, was officially at war with Jordan. Under the Israeli rule, Muslim and Christian Palestinians from the occupied territories are today denied access to places of worship. Those Muslims and Christians who have access to places of worship are Israeli citizens. Desecration of holy sites is done by fanatics. There is no shortage of them among Muslims, Christians and Jews.


THE U.N. RECORD ON ISRAEL AND THE ARABS

16. Of the 175 Security Council resolutions passed before 1990, 97 were directed against Israel.
That is because Israel was at fault 97 times.

17. Of the 690 General Assembly resolutions voted on before 1990, 429 were directed against Israel.
That is because Israel was at fault 429 times.

18. The U.N was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians.
Why is it that Israel did not complain to the U.N.?

19. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians systematically desecrated the ancient Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives.
The U.N. is not a super government. Member states must take the initiative to complain or ask for a Security Council meeting to take up their complaints.

20. The U.N. was silent while the Jordanians enforced an apartheid-like policy of preventing Jews from visiting the Temple Mount and the Western Wall.
See answer given in No. 19.



These are incredible times. We have to ask what our role should be. What will we tell our grandchildren we did when there was a turning point in Jewish destiny, an opportunity to make a difference?
These are indeed incredible times. We should tell our grandchildren the truth.

For those of you who were kind and interested enough to read, the preceding, let me add two more items:

a) Israel is the ONLY MEMBER OF THE UN THAT IS NOT PERMITTED MEMBERSHIP ON THE SECURITY COUNCIL
For Israel to be a member of the Security Council it has to belong to one of the five following groups: Asian states, African states, Latin American and the Caribbean states, Eastern European states, and Western Europe and other states. If no one group wants to accept Israel as a member then there must be something wrong with Israel.
BTW this latter portion was written by a middle eastern christian not a Muslim
 
Even if Israel does have a strong army, it is still a small country and it is surrounded by arab state after arab state after arab state. I mean even with the help of the u.k and u.s.a, how realistic is it for such a small fragile country to really survive that long into the future. I mean i have never seen israel attacked in such a way in all my life. Considering there are only 2 or 3 major cities in Israel, it really wouldnt take very long to destroy Israel, even with a poorly equiped small rag a tag army. I mean, just look at the havoc a small guerilla army like hezbollah has done to you, never mind if countries like egypt and syria and iran were to really come into it. Do u really think such a small and fragile strip of land could seriously withstand a serious war against a serious army. U must be out of ur mind. I mean hezbollah has singlehandedly already set fire to almost half of your country. What will your future policy be, nuke any country that throws a half decent assualt on the 2 or 3 cities and the surrounding small settlements u have?
 
Listen, if you need to cut and paste rhetoric then save it.
And if you need to repeat non historically based rhetoric then also save it ... that is actually a reply to the BS flooding the net ... can't make up history and can't make up religious books to suit your end.... It doesn't work out that way...... by the way if Israel is a fortress at all and a bed of democracy it is because of my tax dollar ... If Palestine is in shambles and in rots it is because my tax dollar isn't going to them due to Israeli imposed sanctions....... now back to topic
 
They did what in khaibar??? You see, there is nothing wrong about knowing things about other religions, atleast learn what is right!

Khaibar-At the end of the war, a jewsih lady invited the prophet [saw] and the companions [ra] to a feast, they accepted and even then, the jews, as always, cunning and sneaky, tried to poison the Prophet [saw], but failed and then martyred another companion [ra].

So you're claiming it is not fair to say, for instance, all Muslims are terrorists based on the fact that pretty much all terrorists are Muslims, but it is fair to say that all Jews are cunning and sneaky because 1400 years ago a single Jewish woman allegedly tried to poison Muhammed?

Also, the reason for this attack was because they had a treaty, and they broke away and transgressed upon the clauses of the treaty, and in those days, if you break a treaty, it means war......

If only you knew that...it would have been ok.....

So it is fair to drive the entire Jewish population out if one of them breaks a treaty in some way - and what did they do to break it by the way? Why isn't it fair to drive out the entire Muslim population out of Palestine, or indeed Lebanon, if they refuse to sign or obey a Treaty? For that matter why can't Britain and Spain expell their Muslim populations on the grounds that some of them have broken their treaty?

After all, fair's fair.

So far you have been a reasonable poster. Do you really mean all the things you are now saying?
 
Well Moshe, i think reducing an entire countries infra structure to rubble over the kidnapping over two soldiers is a bit far fetched.

What do you think would be reasonable? The Arabs went to war with Rome because the Romans kept one single Muslima prisoner. Was that justified? They invaded India because some pirates captured a small number of Muslims and the King could not do anything to return them. Was that justified?
 
gamsta, another pusher of rhetoric let me teach you something about history!!!

Israel and Arabs have battled three major wars and all of those major wars none of them lasted more then a week(it shows how incompetent the arabs are in fighting).

Secondly, I do agree Israel has always had problems with defeating terrorists because their cowards who won't come and show their faces and fight but who hide in civilian terrorities launching katyusha rockets.

If Israel really wanted my friend, it could conquer the middle east in 72 hours.
No need for name calling just because you can't handle the truth and that true terrorism started by your haganah, irgun and stern gang......
 
Hey Moshe
I agree with u 100%. I a really being objective here though. Cant u see it just will not work in the long run? Just taking into account the sheer laws of physics, it just will not work no matter how any a bombs u stack, its like me filling my back garden with all the latest gear and then declaring it seperate from the rest of britain and then raising a star of david flag over my house. I mean, if i was in israel and if i was israeli, i still just would not be able to see it working to long into the future. My desire was not to humiliate. Personally, i think that what we r witnessing in haifa, is the beginning of the end for Israel. Its just comon sense.
 
Israel was done no favours by the UN either, it was given the biggest waste dump of the middle east. I mean nothing was growing!!!! yet we took care of the land and nurtured it back too health and you palestinians want it back. NO WAY HOSE
Glad 6 billion a year are going to good use while one in four children sleeps hungry right here in NY .... Israel will have its day...
 
Israel has refused all UN resolution, and still violates all human rights and the dignity of Palestinians to live in their own land. Resolution 181 and 194 for starters .........
 
Im not trying to claim to have the monopoly over the truth. I just think that maybe rome, india and all that was a very long time ago. In this day and age with the cameras of the world looking at u, i just think u need more of a reason to obliterate a neighbouring country.
Yes the muslim turks caused mass genocide to the christian armenians.
Yes the christian germans caused mass genocide to the europen jews.
So whats the solution to all this in the 21st century. Shall i kill u and your entire family in front of cnn then the qoute these two incidents as justification.
 
PurestAmbrosia. Palestine is a region. do you think before israel Bought the land of Palestine that palestinians called themselves "Palestinians" no they didn't they called themselves "arab" because PALESTINE never existed.
I know you are not much into history so I won't post a link to what Palestine was from the Bronze age until now.... again any Arabic person living in the area Muslim, Christian or Jew can claim a more direct link to (Jacob) who was Israel for all intensive purposes more than the masses that have migrated there ... given that less than 5% of modern Jews are in fact of middle eastern origin, I hazard say... Israel ..... the original Israel isn't you unless you are in fact a middle easterner...... and again ... if land of canaan was promised to Abraham then it should go to his first born no matter who the mother was ... his first born was Ishmael father of modern day Muslims ... forget about this and that ... in the bible... Abraham asks for a land to bury his wife Sarah ... if he owned the place why did he make a purchase? why not just bury her? He was making a point!! ... in your own religious mind do you believe Israel to be a secular state or a religious state?
 
Israel is always to blame right? I mean for goodness sakes look at the productivity and growth being developed in israel it's unsurmountable.

Funny thing is, when you look at google earth and see Israel and it's well developed fields and land, and on the other side the lebanese thirld world infrastructure then will you realize the real problem is POVERTY and with that comes hate for the people who have more then you (Israel).

for god's sake, not all of us are blaming israel for involving in this war. we acknowledged that hizbollah is WRONG in starting this war. we also acknowledged that israel has the right to defend itself and we also acknowledge the fact that israel has the right not to negotiate with hizbollah on the terms and conditions of ending this war. BUT, we also acknowledge that all of these DOES NOT give israel the liberty of using disproportionate force in punishing the lebanese people as a whole as in some kind of collective punishment. israel enemy is hizbollah, NOT the average lebanese people (including christians and others faith), NOT the lebanese infrastructure and certainly NOT the lebanese relief helpers (ambulance drivers etc)........:rollseyes

the real problem is NOT poverty, but rather the prejudice views of both the lebanese and the israeli's alike.......:uhwhat
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top