If I might respectfully comment on some of the Hadith and I accept the isnad is sound but note that (as far as I can tell) the Qu'ran is not cited anywhere (if I am wrong please add the refs)
On the authority of Anas, who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah say: "Allah the Almighty said: 'O son of Adam, so long as you call upon Me and ask of Me, I shall forgive you for what you have done, and I shall not mind. O son of Adam, were your sins to reach the clouds of the sky and were you then to ask forgiveness of Me, I would forgive you. O son of Adam, were you to come to Me with sins nearly as great as the earth and were you then to face Me, ascribing no partner to Me, I would bring you forgiveness nearly as great as it.'"
On the authority of Abu Hurayrah, who said that the Messenger of Allah said:"When Allah decreed the Creation He pledged Himself by writing in His book which is laid down with Him: 'My mercy prevails over my wrath.'"
Hugo - I think this would agree more or less with a Christian view that even the most grievous sin can be forgiven except it does not tell us on what basis forgiveness is given?
actually, the NT DOES discuss, but not explain, an "unforgivable" sin. and you quoted 'My mercy prevails over my wrath.' you see, if Allah wanted creatures that only obey him He has them, they are called Angels. if He wanted creatures that would only disobey them, then the Shayalteen could fill that role. we were created as creatures that WOULD sin, but then Allah taught us words of repentance [Tawbah]. Tawbah is an act of worship. Islam is about constant reliance on and returning to Allah! that's why we we created. if you take the view that we were created for "something else," and then our "sinning" messed that up, then i would submit that THAT Creaotor ISN'T as "all-knowing" as one would expect.
O My servants, you will not attain harming Me so as to harm Me, and you will not attain benefiting Me so as to benefit Me. O my servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to become as pious as the most pious heart of any one man of you, that would not increase My kingdom in anything. O My servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to be as wicked as the most wicked heart of any one man of you, that would not decrease My kingdom in anything. O My servants, were the first of you and the last of you, the human of you and the jinn of you to rise up in one place and make a request of Me, and were I to give everyone what he requested, that would not decrease what I have, any more than a needle decreases the sea if put into it.
O My servants, it is but your deeds that I reckon up for you and then recompense you for, so let him who finds good praise Allah, and let him who finds other than that blame no one but himself."
Hugo - I assume this is relevant because it implies (I think) within the subject of discussion here that God loses nothing by forgiving. But we then seem to be back where we started in that if God acts in a partial way as is implied here then I cannot quite see how he can be Holy?
"Whosoever removes a worldly grief from a believer, Allah will remove from him one of the griefs of the Day of Judgment. Whosoever alleviates [the lot of] a needy person, Allah will alleviate [his lot] in this world and the next. Whosoever shields a Muslim, Allah will shield him in this world and the next. Allah will aid a servant [of His] so long as the servant aids his brother. Whosoever follows a path to seek knowledge therein, Allah will make easy for him a path to Paradise. No people gather together in one of the houses of Allah, reciting the Book of Allah and studying it among themselves, without tranquillity descending upon them, mercy enveloping them, the angels surrounding them, and Allah making mention of them amongst those who are with Him. Whosoever is slowed down by his actions will not be hastened forward by his lineage."
Hugo - here we learn that God rewards good deeds but unfortunately it says nothing about punishments. So again we seem to be back where we started in that if God acts in a partial way as is implied here then I cannot quite see how he can be Holy?
I have lost some of the authorities in forming this post but no disrespect was intended and they can all be found in post 1151