Re: I know humans don't all look the same but could race just be a myth people 1000 y
Claiming that there is no such thing as race is about as ridiculous as claiming there is no difference between hot and cold and night and day. I am a staunch believer of polygenism, which posits that not only are there races, but these different races are actually different free-standing species of completely separate origin. The doctrine of polygenism, at least for me, qualifies as the most plausable and logical conclusion of all. Today's global populations of hominids, while they might all belong to the same GENUS, are nonetheless different species, subdivided down MUCH further still than "European", "Asian" and "African". There are many species within each geographic block.
There are MANY instances of fertile hybrids. Take for example the canids. Fertile canid hybrids occur between coyotes, wolves, dingoes, jackals and domestic dogs.
You are wrong that Ligers are infertile. For example one was known about in the Munich Hellabrunn Zoo. Fertile hybrids also occurs across many species of mammal, fish and plantlife, everything from Orca to Orchid.
From my good experience, the people who most commonly peddle monogenism are Marxists, cultural-imperialist social-engineers, and those who are simply ashamed that they are miscegenated and feel envious of those of pure race.
A single species of animal should LOOK basically the same, but hominids of the world look PROFOUNDLY different in both proportion and size. Even their maturity rates differ astonishingly. It's more these factors that are the important markers in distinguishing races, rather than the superficiality of skin colour.
If you however wish to continue to peddle your popularist politically correct monogenist lunacy, feel free to continue. Just don't you dare appropriate ME as being one of your species. Abide by that small request and I'll be happy enough.
Claiming that there is no such thing as race is about as ridiculous as claiming there is no difference between hot and cold and night and day. I am a staunch believer of polygenism, which posits that not only are there races, but these different races are actually different free-standing species of completely separate origin. The doctrine of polygenism, at least for me, qualifies as the most plausable and logical conclusion of all. Today's global populations of hominids, while they might all belong to the same GENUS, are nonetheless different species, subdivided down MUCH further still than "European", "Asian" and "African". There are many species within each geographic block.
There are MANY instances of fertile hybrids. Take for example the canids. Fertile canid hybrids occur between coyotes, wolves, dingoes, jackals and domestic dogs.
You are wrong that Ligers are infertile. For example one was known about in the Munich Hellabrunn Zoo. Fertile hybrids also occurs across many species of mammal, fish and plantlife, everything from Orca to Orchid.
From my good experience, the people who most commonly peddle monogenism are Marxists, cultural-imperialist social-engineers, and those who are simply ashamed that they are miscegenated and feel envious of those of pure race.
A single species of animal should LOOK basically the same, but hominids of the world look PROFOUNDLY different in both proportion and size. Even their maturity rates differ astonishingly. It's more these factors that are the important markers in distinguishing races, rather than the superficiality of skin colour.
If you however wish to continue to peddle your popularist politically correct monogenist lunacy, feel free to continue. Just don't you dare appropriate ME as being one of your species. Abide by that small request and I'll be happy enough.
Last edited:
