CosmicPathos
Anathema
- Messages
- 3,923
- Reaction score
- 530
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
bro, you are being very uptight about this.
Yes, for one thing religious texts including the Quran use metaphors, parables and alegory that may be lost when taken literally. For example, to say that the universe was created in six days (24-hour periods) is clearly an allegory. I have been to the Grand Canyon and seen the layers in the canyon walls that surely were laid down over a very extended period of time. I think of ayat 3:7 He it is Who has sent down to you the Book: In it are verses basic or fundamental; they are the foundation of the Book: others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord:" and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.Even if the answers science takes us to conflicts with your religious beliefs?
No, there is no verifiable evidence for where we came from and there is no way to verify if there is life after death or if we merely cease to exist. Yes, those are examples of science except for 'astrology' which I think you meant to write astronomy. I think dinosaurs are cool. What if we could have a real 'Jurassic Park'? Pondering on what caused them to become extinct can be interesting in the same manner we can ponder on what caused the collapse of the Mayan civilization.As for where we came from and where we are going, there is evidence of that around us that can be investigated. Consider Archeology, Astrology (which is really a window into history of the cosmos), Paleantology, carbon dating, Meteorology. We can form theories about what whiped out the dinosaurs. Was it an asteroid or was it bacteria or viruses (as some are now finding evidence for).
You are making a huge leap in going from Neanderthal Man supposedly evolving into modern man (which could be considered micro evolution) all the way ToE in toto which says all species of life evolved from a 'Common Ancestor', presumably unicellular and prokaryotic. If someone could present a logical scientifically sound theory that explains the origin of life and the species of life, I would certainly be interested in exploring it. It is interesting to me that I have the same disgust for ToE as you seem to have for all things religious.And yes, we can form theories as to how the human species came to be on earth. We can contrast it with evidence on neanderthals, and we can build a theory of evolution. Evolution is an interesting theory that if true would explain a lot of otherwise unconnected aspects of biology.
I agree that the Eucharist is not scientifically sound and it would be really gross if it was; however, metaphorically it has meaning for Christians. I agree that the universe was not created in 6 literal days as we know a 'day'.science CAN address specific claims such as transubtantiation, the age of the approximate age of the earth, etc.
I don't believe God is unknowable given we're all born in the state of fitrah.. in fact so show their studies..both are unknowable.
Possible yes. Not "revealed truth".
Sure, it MAY be possible, but so may the other theories I noted, so may the creation myths of other incompatible religions and cultures.
You didn't point out any flaws. And if we design the theories to be not falsifiable (as is the "one creator in Islam"), you'll never be able to disprove them. Atheists see your beliefs exactly the same way you see these other theories. Now if on the other hand we start making specific material claims from these theories then we can falsify those claims, things like transubstantiation (does the cracker actually become flesh at any point?) or the age of the earth or if there was a global flood, etc.
Do you actually think these atheists hold to these fantasies in the same way that you hold to yours? The guy who invented the universe in a jar theory was a fiction writer, the guy who made the matrix movie was a movie producer. Both are just fun fantasy ideas. They don't hold these out as "revealed truths".
unknowable for those with sealed hearts.
I don't believe God is unknowable given we're all born in the state of fitrah.. in fact so show their studies..
It is their privilege to turn away from what's right in front of their eyes by the truck load.. I personally wouldn't humor it..unknowable for those with sealed hearts.
since I have to reply back to psygocelis in his own language, had to say that.
Can you please explain to us what is wrong with the most basic, fundamental idea of One creator in Islam? and I am not talking about Islamic teachings, angels, etc, I am talking about the ACTUAL Islamic principle of tawheed (one godhood).
Strange but this brought to mind was a quote from the Executive Summary of the 9/11 Commision Report, "The most important failure was one of imagination. We do not believe leaders understood the gravity of the threat." It seems that atheists start with the supposition that 'God does not exist' and thereby eliminate the possibility of a Creator being responsible for all that exists. I see a painting of a Victorian house on my wall as an analogy for the universe. I see the intimate detail in the painting and I know that a very talented man spent hours, days and perhaps weeks creating this painting. In the same way I sit back in awe of the creation and I say, "Glory to Allah!" as I see evidence of the Creator. I believe it was Sister Bluebell who said something to the effect that the amazing thing about atheists is their apparent lack of awe that believers have when we see the the details and beauty of the creation.At the end of the day the answer to "why are we atheists" is because we have no convinceing reason to be otherwise.
It is interesting to me that I have the same disgust for ToE as you seem to have for all things religious.
Ramadhan said:Also, I did point to such flaws to your theories because you were not able to answer my next questions: what was the cause of the multiverses, etc etc.
Sure, it MAY be possible, but so may the other theories I noted, so may the creation myths of other incompatible religions and cultures.
Can you please tell me why the truth according to Islam is such an impossibility?
It seems that atheists start with the supposition that 'God does not exist'
the amazing thing about atheists is their apparent lack of awe that believers have when we see the the details and beauty of the creation.
I take the comment as referring to stories of creation not being questioned or revised by believers. I remind you that some things in the Quran are allegorical and no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah.I would also be disgusted by somebody, atheist or theist, who declared the theory of evolution as absolute revealed truth and not to be questioned or revised.
psychocelis: you have not presented a convincing evidence for atheism. You talk against murder and what not. I dont believe in your morality (or any morality) for the same reason you dont believe in my God. Both are unseen and both are unknowable.
How do you have a sense of awe with chance, randomness and inadequacy offered by ToE?When you don't have a "God" to attribute everything to it becomes that much MORE beautiful, and yes, awesome.
CosmicPathology: It does not surprise me that you have no belief in morality.
When you don't have a "God" to attribute everything to it becomes that much MORE beautiful, and yes, awesome.
I would also be disgusted by somebody, atheist or theist, who declared the theory of evolution as absolute revealed truth and not to be questioned or revised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.