I'll admit that I haven't read all of the Quran yet, but I don't understand how you feel this is true when the Quran contradicts what is in the Bible. If the two books were indeed inspired by the same God, shouldn't they harmonize with one another insead of contradict?
I am sorry for posting off-topic, but I can't let this slide.
I completely agree with Brother Muhajid that there is but One God.
And I also agree with the statement that there is but one God. I'll even go so far as to say that I think that Islam, Christianity, and Judaism all
attempt to worship the very same God who we might collectively call the God of Abraham.
But I have to stop there. Brother Muhajid's statemenet was made in response to my comment:
Originally Posted by Grace Seeker
For instance, I think this would be a good practice for those who misquote or misinterpret Biblical passages and then object to the God of the Bible because it is supposed to present a picture of God that they can't accept,
Whether you accept that there is misquoting and misinterpretation going on or not, clearly the attributes that these three religions present of God are not the same. We may each claim to worship the One God, but the pictures we paint of that God are radically different. Arguing over which is true seems to be a waste of time, we each think our own view is correct and for me to quote the Bible
at a Muslim to prove my point or for a Muslim to quote the Quran
at me to make his/her point seems about like a child claiming my daddy is better than your daddy. Of course we each think that ours is the best, but making those claims proves nothing to no one.
Much better I think to try to understand where the other is coming from. And it is for this reason that I said what I said about the misquoting (or at least the misinterpretations) of scripture.
For instance: In another thread a Muslim has been trying to make the case to me that the God of the Bible is a lesser god than Allah because the god of the Bible has to rest. And then he cites the story of creation in Genesis where, in the English translation he cited, God rests on the seventh day. In this case he isn't misquoting, but he is not properly understanding that passage either if he thinks it is really about God needing to rest as in taking a nap. The need to rest is NOT an attribute of the God of the Bible any more than it is of Allah. That view comes from a complete misunderstanding of what the text was actually saying. But rather than simply accept correction on that he wanted to argue with me that he knew what the word "rest" meant, is if that had anything to do with understanding a passage that had been translated out of another language into English. Likewise, many Muslims think that Christians ascribe partners to God or have multiplicity of gods, yet again that does not reflect the Christian understanding of our beliefs. Such statements are in fact just the creation of strawmen. They do nothing to compare the Christian understanding of God with the Muslim understanding of Allah when they in fact do not correct represent the Christian understanding of God to begin with. A Muslim can say that Christians believe so and so all they want, but saying it does not make it true, and quoting the Qur'an against something the Christians do not believe doesn't make it more true. To critique the Christian faith one must first acurately portray the Christian faith.
Now, I have been asked why do I continually seek clarification and feedback to ascertain if I have understood an answer correctly. It is because if I critique Islam, I want to be sure it is actually Islam I am critiquing. I have no desire to critique some distorted view of Islam that no Muslims actually believe. Yet, it seems that many Muslims do in fact like to get out their cut and paste machines finding some lecture that purports to destory the Christian faith with a 101 questions of the Bible or a treatise on why so many versions, as if they have found something really damaging. In reality they are attacking strawmen as surely as if I was to attack Islam on the grounds that Jihad is all about flying airplanes into buildings or that Muhammad slept with a 9 year old girl I've proved him a false prophet.
Of course ignorant people of all backgrounds will continue to pursue such red herrings and ad hominum arguments, but why would others who are not so ignorant?
Why do Muslims who don't even accept the Bible as true, continue to use the Bible to attempt to authenticate the Qur'an?
Why do Muslims that read the Bible insist on doubting its veracity despite the plethora of extant ancient copies and cooberating manuscripts from the first couple of centuries of the Christians era, yet seem to have no problem accepting a book like the supposed Gospel of Barnabas which can't be traced back any further than the 1300s?
And why would a person misquote or misinterpret the Bible and then assert that based on such a falsified passage they can show that the God of Christianity is flawed? Duh, of course a god portrayed by a flawed understanding of the scriptures is going to be a flawed god, nothing insightful about that.
And why do I find these patterns repeated over and over and over again on this board?