Ahmadinejad calls for UN 9/11 investigation

[جوري]

Peer review means the paper is reviewed by other experts (peers) in the field. In this case, structural engineering.

a conundrum then why the expertise of 1328 verified architectural and engineering professionals isn't good enough for you?

all the best

 

[Dagless]

Peer review means the paper is reviewed by other experts (peers) in the field.

I already gave you one.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007

 

[ChargerCarl]

a conundrum then why the expertise of architectural and engineering professionals isn't good enough for you?

all the best
[/SIZE][/COLOR]

A petition is not a peer reviewed paper, I've been very clear about that. They actually have to write a thesis and publish it.

 

[ChargerCarl]

I already gave you one.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007

Please, Steven A. Jones paper has been thoroughly debunked and is completely implausible.

The thermite came from the thousands of melted computers.

 

[جوري]

A petition is not a peer reviewed paper, I've been very clear about that. They actually have to write a thesis and publish it.

No one has written a 'thesis' on 911, what is available is an official govt. report. Independent engineers would like an independent investigation of the events..

It is really rather simple!

all the best

 

[Dagless]

The thermite came from the thousands of melted computers.

Can I see a peer reviewed paper on that?

 

[جوري]

Please, Steven A. Jones paper has been thoroughly debunked and is completely implausible.

The thermite came from the thousands of melted computers.

thousands of melted computers, didn't seem to touch this:

amazing ain't it? 'thoroughly debunked' ;D

 

[ChargerCarl]

No one has written a 'thesis' on 911, what is available is an official govt. report. Independent engineers would like an independent investigation of the events..

It is really rather simple!

all the best

I already posted an independent study conducted by northwestern university...guess you didn't read it

 

[ChargerCarl]

Can I see a peer reviewed paper on that?

debunking911.com/jones.htm

 

[جوري]

I already posted an independent study conducted by northwestern university...guess you didn't read it

That isn't a 'study' hence our query to your understanding of what 'peer reviewed' means!

 

[جوري]

debunking911.com/jones.htm

If it is about one website or another, then it comes down to the logical questions!
we don't believe in invisible planes and invincible passports (amongst other hilarity)

all the best

 

[Dagless]

debunking911.com/jones.htm

Isn't this what you're accusing others of doing? You've linked to a site which has someone giving their own opinion on the document. This is not a peer reviewed document.

 

[جوري]

Isn't this what you're accusing others of doing? You've linked to a site which has someone giving their own opinion on the document. This is not a peer reviewed document.

he must have recently just learned the term and came to use it on us bucolic cave dwelling oafs!

 

[ChargerCarl]

No, that site actually does analysis and provides sources for everything. Read the thermite section, even if it doesn't change your mind you should at least read what it has to say.

 

[Dagless]

No, that site actually does analysis and provides sources for everything. Read the thermite section, even if it doesn't change your mind you should at least read what it has to say.

A person providing sources in an article, expressing his own opinion, on a website does not make it peer reviewed. I'm only holding your responses to the same standards you've held everyone else's.

 

[ChargerCarl]

Just read it, thats all I'm asking for.

Besides, I can just quote the NIST and be done with this.

 

[جوري]

No, that site actually does analysis and provides sources for everything. Read the thermite section, even if it doesn't change your mind you should at least read what it has to say.

A person providing sources in an article, expressing his own opinion on a website, does not make it peer reviewed. I'm only holding your responses to the same standards you've held everyone else's.

Dagless pretty much summed it up for you, an expression of opinion on a website doesn't constitute 'peer reviewed' and as it happens the website I have provided will by that token you've generously parted with have more 'peer reviews' and given that it is an independent source and not a govt. dispensed with a particular political interest in mind, calls for just that a critical examination which will free it from biases and confounders..here are a couple more words for you to look up so you can use them on the next saps with hopes that they'll be taken aback by your profound 'technical vocabulary'!

all the best

 

[Dagless]

Besides, I can just quote the NIST and be done with this.

You can quote a US government agency to backup the government? That's like Israel investigating the flotilla incident.

 

[ChargerCarl]

Not really since people trust the United States. It's why treasury T-bond yields are so low, the United States government commands a great deal of respect. Their word is credible.

 

[Ramadhan]

Not really since people trust the United States. It's why treasury T-bond yields are so low, the United States government commands a great deal of respect. Their word is credible.

What does T-bonds yields have to do whether the US has done any cover ups?

T-bonds yields are low because most of world trades and finances are still conducted in USD so there is always huge demands for USD, and that the world (at least for now, although for how much longer it is still open for debate) still has confidence that the USG will be able to service the debts.
So as long as USD is still used much for world trades and finances and the USG can contain their inflation and keep domestic economy afloat, the confidence is still there.
But for certain, sooner or later, the influence of USD will wane, because other economies will get stronger in relative to the US (you don't think US will remain superpower forever, do you?) and they may want to use more and more their own currencies: yuans, euros or what have you.
This, coupled with weak US economy and burgeoning foreign debts will make T bills much less attractive.

Now back on the topic on the question whether we can fully trust the USG, in the past decade there have been flurry of declassified CIA documents which pointed to the US involvements in supporting military coups in many countries in the late 60s and 70s (including in my own country, indonesia), where the USG has previously denied.
Remember also the Contra scandal?
Only a fool can fully trust their governments.

The USG will always need to assert their political and military power in the world to keep their superpower status which have positive impacts on their economy.
But it won't last.

Mark my word