Wow! This is going to be really fun to respond to. I think the reason that most people probably dont respond to your post about this garbage is because it is completely idiotic.
Ok this one is easy, the news article states that it is the Bush and Clinton administration that were part of the cause of 9/11, not that they actually blew the buildings up. To say that this is "proof" that the US blew up there own buildings is your imagination running wild
ok an Ohio university polled 1,010 people, there are 300,000,000 people in the US, what in the world makes you think that this represents the 1/3 of the US peoples view? Let me tell you something my friend, if 9/11 were an inside job, CNN, MSNBC, BBC, etc would be all over it, the fact is that is just didnt happen. As far as your theory here that somehow 333 people out of 1010 people represent the entire country, it is laughable. I will stop there though because I am pretty sure this one has been and can easily be shown as false.
Why is this news? Yes the initial information that there were WMD in Iraq turned out wrong, but here is the thing, SH threatened many times over an attack with these types of weapons, therefore he was a potential threat. The fact that they werent there (or I could throw out the conspiracy theory that they were moved before troops got them, but I wont stoop to your level) means nothing, the man was a threat to everyone around him and the US. And whether or not he had them is irrelevant, at the very least he was a very very good candidate to be used by Al-Qaida as a government conduit for their operations.
I wonder what the ethics of the Al-Qaeda and other fighters in Iraq might be found to be? It is obvious that it is a brutal enemy, which means that we must adapt and use similar tactics to show we are not to be messed with, this is war, not a tea party, nasty bad things happen in war. What is your point?
I would agree with this if it said the Iraqi people. The insurgents are just as much foreign invaders as the US is, I would bet if you polled the Iraqis they would take the US troops over the insurgents anyways. The deaths caused by these insurgents is many many many many times higher than that caused by US troops.
I dont think that there is defeat for the US, but the war is hopeless. I would love to leave Iraq and let these people jsut keep killing each other, heck they are eliminating themselves, they dont seem to need any help.
Yes, kill anyone that threatens us. There is no need to threaten the US, we have never invaded any country unprovoked. So if you threaten then you ask for it. What could he do? Well if he had what he said he could pass it to terrorists or launch an attack himself and cause many more deaths than that of 9/11. As for your last statement, it shows your complete ignorance. Show me one drop of free, reduced price, etc. oil that has come from Iraq...LOL It truly does show your mindset and your level of intelligence. The information about price and amounts of oil the US recieves from various country is public information, look it up and get your facts straight so you can stop looking uneducated.
Yes, the value of my life, to me, is higher than that of the one who threatens me. I would think anyone would agree with that. I wont respond to puppet leaders because really what is the difference between those we have helped to power and those who have taken, usually the countries that the US helps live in peace with the world, the others do not.
As far as bin Laden, let me let you in on a little secret, he is an outcast from his own country. His country requested the US come to their land and help them, it was not bin Ladens decision to make. His attack was unprovoked and was the work of a psychotic. If he wanted the US to leave his country, he should have appealed to officials. (by the way I think you are using the term kuffar out of context, I am told that only polytheist are Kuffar, and the US is more of a Christian country, but please let me know if you are using it in a derogatory sense, because there are plenty of things I could call your people)
There are currently 16 bases in the middle east for the US, but that is only while we are at war and these bases are leased to US by allies. What is it your concern, they have not taken these bases, they were offered to them. If a country needed the US as a base in a war situation the US would help, as long as that country was an allie with the US.
I am not really sure what to think when you say majority, because of your ridiculousness above with your statistics. You speak of attacks on the US govt systems, this is more nonsense, there may be people attempting to breach security but they never or rarely do, and that doesnt mean that everyone is doing it, there are 6 billion people in the world, think about it, if there were 1000 different people each day "attacking" it that is barely a percentage, and could easily come from one country or even one terror group.
When people like you stop blaming everyone else for their problems and come to grip with reality, then the world will come to peace. When your Muslim people stop attacking our embassies, buildings and people, then there will be peace. When Muslims in general stop acting like they have nothing to do with the problems in the world today, then there will be peace. You use the word ethnocentric, and it is funny because throughout your people history you are absolutely the most ethnocentric people ever to walk the earth.
Please dont respond with anymore of your garbage, next time bring something realistic.:rant: :grumbling