vpb
IB Expert
- Messages
- 1,943
- Reaction score
- 189
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
We know that it was one of his enemies, but we don't know who exactly. and I don't know why do u expect Qur'an to explain everything in detail.I think you missed my point. I asked, if Jesus was not crucified, then WHO was? Islam teaches that someone took Jesus' place and was crucified in His place. My question is WHO?? And where is HIS body?? Someone died but that someone still had a dead body afterward, right? Where is that dead body? Was it not buried in what should have been Jesus' tomb, because everyone thought it was really Jesus? And how did it then disappear when a bunch of soldiers guarded the tomb and there was a huge rock in front of it, sealed closed? Your story, which you believe and stake your eternal destiny on, doesn't even make sense. Nor is it supported by ANY evidence, historical records or proof.
1.Qur'an is not a book about Christianity.
2.Qur'an was sent for Tawheed. and the whole Qur'an is about Tawheed (Oneness of Allah).
3.Qur'an touches briefly some points about other religions. or a different examples is , that out of 125,000 prophets sent , Qur'an points out only few of them.
so we know that Qur'an's main purpose is to teach the oneness of Allah, which was taught in Injeel (Bible), Tewrat(Torah), but since people altered them, Qur'an came to confirm them as Allah swt says in the Qur'an,
2:97. Say: Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel-for he brings down the (revelation) to thy heart by Allah.s will, a confirmation of what went before, and guidance and glad tidings for those who believe,-
that body should have been buried just like all other bodies. remember, all the bodies of humans get rotten, except the body of the Prophets, but in this case Jesus a.s was raised to heaven, so we have no body here, but the body that was supposed to be on the tomb, it's like any other person's body who died in this world.Where is that dead body? Was it not buried in what should have been Jesus' tomb, because everyone thought it was really Jesus?
Nor is it supported by ANY evidence, historical records or proof.
I don't know why u keep saying this, when u can't prove yourself. even if u want to prove it by using bible, you have to prove that bible has no errors, which I think you might not be able to. So on both sources (scientifically, biblically) you may fail to prove such an event about Jesus a.s.
What? PETER had "nothing to do with Jesus"? That's like saying Muhammad had nothing to do with Allah. What a foolish statement.
I said that bc this "PETER" does not teach according to what Jesus a.s taught, that's why I'm saying "has nothing to do with Jesus". whereas Muhammed saws teaches according to what Jesus taught, Moses , Noah etc etc. peace be upon all of them.
you should check how different layers evolved from the Q Gospel, during the time when christians were treated in hostility by jews, and it was a perfect situation for the teaching of the Jesus a.s to be changed.And PETER didn't teach what Jesus taught? Prove it. I hope you know that the only way you can do that is to have 1st century manuscripts of Peter's letters, authenticated to be written by him, teaching something contrary to what Jesus taught. Do you have them? Of course not. So don't make ridiculous claims that you cannot possibly substantiate.
and please , let us not go on discussion about Bible, cuz we know what are the outcomings of such a talk.